Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes an exploratory study involving the design of an after-school robotics class for groups of children at the higher-functioning end of the autistic spectrum. The aim of the study was to foster collaboration among the children in the context of a class where they programmed Lego robots under the guidance of an experimenter. The class took place once a week over several months and used many different measures to assess the children’s collaborative behaviours. Detailed analysis of behavioural data is presented, and despite the small sample size, our findings suggest that the number of potentially collaborative behaviours the children displayed during a class is more strongly related to the amount of enjoyment the children derived from the classes than to the number of classes in which the children participated. Parallel-run, free-form drawing sessions conducted before certain classes gave some indication that these behavioural changes partly generalized to a different context. Additionally, many of the children in the class either found their experiences in class to be helpful in other social interactions or expected them to be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Electronic copies of these questionnaires will be made available upon request to the authors.

  2. Kappa values of 0.4–0.6 have been characterized as fair, 0.6–0.75 as good, and over 0.75 as excellent [36].

  3. Three sessions were selected to be located at the beginning, middle and towards the end of the study. The ninth class was selected in order to have an opportunity to include all children in the activity, even those who may not attend the very last session.

References

  1. AURORA, URL: http://www.aurora-project.com/. Accessed 22 May 2009

  2. Werry I, Dautenhahn K, Ogden B, Harwin W (2001) Can social interaction skills be taught by a social agent? The role of a robotic mediator in autism therapy. In: Beynon M, Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K (eds) Proc CT2001, The fourth international conference on cognitive technology: instruments of mind, LNAI 2117. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–74

  3. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2005) Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Univ Access Inf Soc 4(2):105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2006) The role of the experimenter in HRI research—a case study evaluation of children with autism interacting with a robotic toy. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Hatfield, England, September 6–8, 2006). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 646–651

  5. Attwood AJ (1998) Asperger’s syndrome: a guide for parents and professionals. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenspan SI, Wieder S (1998) The child with special needs: encouraging intellectual and emotional growth. Perseus Books, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  7. LeGoff DB (2004) Use of LEGO as a therapeutic medium for improving social cCompetence. J Autism Develop Disord 34(5):557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LeGoff DB, Sherman M (2006) Long-term outcome of social skills intervention based on interactive LEGO® play. Autism 10(4):317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Owens G, Granader Y, Humphrey A, Baron-Cohen S (2008) LEGO® therapy and the social use of language programme: an evaluation of two social skills interventions for children with high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 38(10):1944–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colby K, Smith D (1971) Computers in the treatment of non speaking autistic children. Curr Psychiatr Ther 11:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore DJ (1998) Computers and people with autism/asperger syndrome. Communication, Summer, 20–21

  12. Powell S (1996) The use of computers in teaching people with autism. In: Autism on the agenda: papers from a National Autistic Society conference, London

  13. Fombonne E (2003) The prevalence of autism. J Am Med Assoc 289:87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. The National Autistic Society, URL: http://www.nas.org.uk. Last accessed 24 February 2009

  15. Wing L (1996) The autistic spectrum. Constable Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frith U (1989) Autism: explaining the enigma. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jordan R (2003) Social play and autism spectrum disorders. Autism 7:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liebal K, Colombi C, Rogers SJ, Warneken F, Tomasello M (2008) Helping and Cooperation in Children with Autism. J Autism Develop Disord 38(2):224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howlin P, Baron-Cohen S, Hadwin J (1999) Teaching children with autism to mind-read. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  20. Restall G, Magill-Evans J (1994) Play and preschool children with autism. Am J Occupat Ther 48:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wolfberg PJ, Schuler AL (1999) Fostering peer interaction, imaginative play, & spontaneous language in children with autism. Child Lang Teach Ther 15(1):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Charman T, Baron-Cohen S (1997) Brief report: prompted pretend play in autism. J Autism Develop Disord 27:325–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fasel I, Deak GO, Triesch J, Movellan J (2002) Combining embodied models and empirical research for understanding the development of shared attention. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on development and learning

  24. Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2005) Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy. In: Proc of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 341–346

  25. Michaud F, Théberge-Turmel F (2002) Mobile robotic toys and autism. In: Dautenhahn K, Bond A, Canamero L, Edmonds B (eds) Socially intelligent agents—creating relationships with computers and robots. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 125–132

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2007) Encouraging social interaction skills in children with autism playing with robots: a case study evaluation of triadic interactions involving children with autism, other people (peers and adults) and a robotic toy. ENFANCE 59(1):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jordan R (1999) Autistic spectrum disorders—an introductory handbook for practitioners. David Fulton Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2004) Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism. In: Proceedings Cambridge workshop on universal access and assistive technology, Springer-Verlag, London, pp 225–236

  29. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dubowski J (2006) Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot?. Interact Stud 7:509–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bondy AS, Frost LA (1994) The picture exchange communication system: training manual. Pyramid, Cherry Hill, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gresham FM, Elliott SN (1990) Social skills rating system. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bauminger N (2002) The facilitation of social–emotional understanding and social interaction in high-functioning children with autism: intervention outcomes. J Autism Develop Disord 32:283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hall Edward T (1966) The hidden dimension. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S (eds) Distributed work. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 57–80

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bakeman R (1986) Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson A, Moore DW, Godfrey R, Fletcher-Flinn CM (2004) Social skills assessment of children with autism in free-play situations. SAGE Publ Nat Autistic Soc 8(4):369–385

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (2008) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Evans K, Dubowski J (2001) Art therapy with children on the autistic spectrum: beyond words. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parten M (1932) Social play among preschool children. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 27:243–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the organizers of SNAAP, Christine Haugh, Matt Connoly, and Steph Moriarty, for granting us the use of their facilities, as well as all the parents, carers, and children of SNAAP for attending our classes. We would also like to thank Scott Watson for his psychological expertise in capturing and analyzing data, advice, and endless patience.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adaptive Systems Research Group Hatfield, School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, England

    Joshua Wainer, Ester Ferrari, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Ben Robins

Authors
  1. Joshua Wainer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ester Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerstin Dautenhahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ben Robins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Wainer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wainer, J., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K. et al. The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14, 445–455 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0266-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0266-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation