Original articleElectrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome
References (17)
- et al.
Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the Impairment Evaluation Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand: validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument
J Orthop Sci
(2007) - et al.
Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association; Impairment Evaluation Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Comparison of responsiveness of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument to surgical treatment with DASH, SF-36, and physical findings
J Orthop Sci
(2007) - et al.
Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire
J Orthop Sci
(2006) - et al.
The relationship between electrodiagnostic findings and patient symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2007) - et al.
Carpal tunnel syndrome: the correlation between outcome, symptoms and nerve conduction study findings
J Hand Surg [Br]
(2001) - et al.
Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome
J Hand Surg [Br]
(2000) - et al.
Value of electrodiagnostic tests in carpal tunnel syndrome
J Hand Surg [Br]
(2000) - et al.
Postoperative nerve conduction changes after open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Clin Neurophysiol
(2002)
Cited by (32)
Rasch analysis of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument
2024, Journal of Hand TherapyRe-evaluation of the Indications for the Camitz Procedure in Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
2023, Journal of Hand SurgeryLong-Term Outcome of Electrodiagnostic Values and Symptom Improvement After Carpal Tunnel Release: A Retrospective Cohort Study
2022, Journal of Hand SurgeryCitation Excerpt :We found that CMAP values were significantly higher in the moderate CTS group than in the severe group at baseline and improved in all follow-up measurements. Postoperative improvements have been reported previously, while some studies do not show significant results in this context.21–24 In our study, we determined that the CMAP value continued to increase until 1 year in only the moderate CTS group, whereas 3-month and 1-year CMAP values were similar to the preoperative values in severe CTS.
Evaluation of carpal tunnel release outcomes by the Japanese version of the carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire compared to an electrophysiological severity grade
2021, Journal of Orthopaedic ScienceCitation Excerpt :They confirmed the reliability of the CTSI-JSSH and reported a moderate-large response of SRM and ES postoperatively 3 months after CTR (Table 3). Uchiyama et al. [24] and Itsubo et al. [26] also reported a moderate or large response 3 months after CTR (Table 3) by use of the CTSI-JSSH. Although those three reports had a similar cultural background to our study, they showed smaller responsiveness than our results in a smaller size of patients not representative of the general population.
Endoscopic release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome in octogenarians
2014, Journal of Hand SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The higher these parameters, the greater the responsiveness. The values greater than 0.8 indicated large responsiveness, between 0.5 and 0.79 moderate, and less than 0.5 small.17,18 All results are presented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using the Fisher exact probability test, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, or Mann-Whitney U test.
A scoping review of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores for hand and wrist conditions
2014, Journal of Hand SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Table 1 lists the characteristics of the articles. Most of articles (98%) were research studies consisting of 56% prospective studies (Abzug et al, Taras et al, and Raizman et al, presented at the American Association for Hand Surgery, 2012; Henry M, presented at the American Association for Hand Surgery, 2013),11–55 12% cross-sectional studies,56–60 26% retrospective cohort studies (Habbu and Kalliainen, presented at the American Association for Hand Surgery, 2013),61–81 and 5% randomized trials.82–85 The non-original article was a systematic review of hand transplant outcomes.86