Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of duloxetine versus alternative oral therapies: an indirect comparison of randomised clinical trials in chronic low back pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to obtain parameter estimates for the efficacy of duloxetine versus alternative oral therapies for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Materials and Methods

Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trials. Studies reporting pain intensity, with parallel-group design of oral treatments with length of treatment of more than 8 weeks were included. A Bayesian approach to indirect comparisons was applied, using standardised mean difference as a measure of relative treatment effect.

Results

Fifteen studies were identified comparing duloxetine with the following oral drug classes: non-scheduled opioids, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, scheduled opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and ‘other’ (i.e. glucosamine). The primary analysis found scheduled opioids to be more effective than duloxetine for the fixed effects model. However, the estimate of the treatment difference reflected a less than small magnitude of effect (|standardised mean difference| <0.2), and there was no difference for the random effects model. No differences were found in sensitivity analyses involving the subset of patients not receiving concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication.

Conclusion

The available evidence shows that there does not seem to be any difference in efficacy between duloxetine and other oral pharmacological therapies, providing a valuable alternative for this disabling condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birbara CA, Puopolo AD, Munoz DR, Sheldon EA, Mangione A, Bohidar NR, Geba GP (2003) Treatment of chronic low back pain with etoricoxib, a new cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor: improvement in pain and disability––a randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-month trial. J Pain 4:307–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buynak R, Shapiro DY, Okamoto A, Van HI, Rauschkolb C, Steup A, Lange B, Lange C, Etropolski M (2010) Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active-controlled Phase III study. Expert Opin Pharmacother 11:1787–1804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the american college of physicians and the american pain society. Ann Intern Med 147:478–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choy E, Marshall D, Gabriel ZL, Mitchell SA, Gylee E, Dakin HA (2011) A systematic review and mixed treatment comparison of the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for fibromyalgia. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:335–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deyo RA (1996) Drug therapy for back pain. Which drugs help which patients? Spine 21:2840–2849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickens CJ (2000) The relationship between pain and depression in a trial using paroxetine in sufferers of chronic low back pain. Psychosomatics 41:2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eli Lilly and Company (2009) Effect of duloxetine 60 mg once daily versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain (F1 J-Mc-HMGC). Internal report: 1–983

  9. Eli Lilly and Company (2008) Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of chronic low back pain (F1 J-MC-HMEO). Internal report: 1–1435

  10. Eli Lilly and Company (2008) Effect of duloxetine 60 mg to 120 mg once daily in patients with chronic low back pain (F1 J-MC-HMEN). Internal report: 1–614

  11. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, Nachemson A, Petzke F, Williams DA, Clauw DJ (2004) Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 50:613–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grabois M (2005) Management of chronic low back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:S29–S41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hale M, Khan A, Kutch M, Li S (2010) Once daily OROS hydromorphone ER compared with placebo in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic low back pain. Curr Med Res Opin 26:1505–1518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hale ME, Ahdieh H, Ma T, Rauck R (2007) Efficacy and safety of OPANA ER (oxymorphone extended release) for relief of moderate to severe chronic low back pain in opioid-experienced patients: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Pain 8:175–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JPT, Green S (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The cochrane collaboration

  17. Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, Boersma C, Thompson D, Larholt KM, Diaz M, Barrett A (2011) Conducting indirect-treatment comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 2. Value Health 14:429–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R (2010) The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24:769–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz N, Rauck R, Ahdieh H, Ma T, Gerritsen vdH, Kerwin R, Podolsky G (2007) A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of oxymorphone extended release for opioid-naive patients with chronic low back pain. Curr Med Res Opin 23:117–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Machado LA, Kamper SJ, Herbert RD, Maher CG, McAuley JH (2009) Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Rheumatology 48:520–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore RA, Straube S, Derry S, McQuay HJ (2010) Chronic low back pain analgesic studies––a methodological minefield. Pain 149:431–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pallay RM, Seger W, Adler JL, Ettlinger RE, Quaidoo EA, Lipetz R, O’Brien K, Mucciola L, Skalky CS, Petruschke RA, Bohidar NR, Geba GP (2004) Etoricoxib reduced pain and disability and improved quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a 3 month, randomized, controlled trial. Scand J Rheumatol 33:257–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peloso PM, Fortin L, Beaulieu A, Kamin M, Rosenthal N (2004) Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets (Ultracet) in treatment of chronic low back pain: a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. J Rheumatol 31:2454–2463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Quilici S, Chancellor J, Lothgren M, Simon D, Said G, Le TK, Garcia-Cebrian A, Monz B (2009) Meta-analysis of duloxetine versus pregabalin and gabapentin in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. BMC Neurol 9:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruoff GE, Rosenthal N, Jordan D, Karim R, Kamin M (2003) Tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets for the treatment of chronic lower back pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study. Clin Ther 25:1123–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shekelle PG, Markovich M, Louie R (1995) An epidemiologic study of episodes of back pain care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1668–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shekelle PG, Markovich M, Louie R (1995) Comparing the costs between provider types of episodes of back pain care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:221–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Skljarevski V, Desaiah D, Liu-Seifert H, Zhang Q, Chappell AS, Detke MJ, Iyengar S, Atkinson JH, Backonja M (2010) Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E578–E585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Skljarevski V, Ossanna M, Liu-Seifert H, Zhang Q, Chappell A, Iyengar S, Detke M, Backonja M (2009) A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain. Eur J Neurol 16:1041–1048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Skljarevski V, Zhang S, Desaiah D, Alaka KJ, Palacios S, Miazgowski T, Patrick K (2010) Duloxetine versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain: a 12 week, fixed-dose, randomized, double-blind trial. J Pain 11:1282–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Spiegelhalter D, Abrams K, Myles J (2004) Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. Statistics in Practice. Wiley, New York

  32. Straube S, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore RA (2008) Enriched enrollment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 66:266–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tacconelli E (2010) Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Lancet Infect Dis 10(4):226

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vorsanger GJ, Xiang J, Gana TJ, Pascual ML, Fleming RR (2008) Extended-release tramadol (tramadol ER) in the treatment of chronic low back pain. J Opioid Manag 4:87–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Webster LR, Butera PG, Moran LV, Wu N, Burns LH, Friedmann N (2006) Oxytrex minimizes physical dependence while providing effective analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in low back pain. J Pain 7:937–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilkens P, Scheel IB, Grundnes O, Hellum C, Storheim K (2010) Effect of glucosamine on pain-related disability in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative lumbar osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304:45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OptumInsight, Nanterre, France

    Hélène Cawston

  2. OptumInsight, 3rd Floor, Beaufort House, Cricket Field Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 1QG, UK

    Alison Davie

  3. Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France

    Marie-Ange Paget

  4. Eli Lilly and Company Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, USA

    Vladimir Skljarevski

  5. Eli Lilly and Company, Frankfurt, Germany

    Michael Happich

Authors
  1. Hélène Cawston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alison Davie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie-Ange Paget
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vladimir Skljarevski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Happich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Davie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cawston, H., Davie, A., Paget, MA. et al. Efficacy of duloxetine versus alternative oral therapies: an indirect comparison of randomised clinical trials in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 22, 1996–2009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2804-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2804-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation