Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative assessment of myelopathy patients using motor evoked potentials produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) study using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may give a functional assessment of corticospinal conduction. But there are no large studies on MEPs using TMS in myelopathy patients. The purpose of this study is to confirm the usefulness of MEPs for the assessment of the myelopathy and to investigate the use of MEPs using TMS as a screening tool for myelopathy. We measured the MEPs of 831 patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of myelopathy using TMS. The MEPs from the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles were evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time from the MEP latency. Later, 349 patients had surgery for myelopathy (operative group) and 482 patients were treated conservatively (nonoperative group). CMCTs in the operative group and nonoperative group were assessed. MEPs were prolonged in 711 patients (86%) and CMCTs were prolonged in 493 patients (59%) compared with the control patients. CMCTs from the ADM and AH in the operative group were significantly more prolonged than that in the nonoperative group. All patients in the operative group showed prolongation of MEPs or CMCTs or multiphase of the MEP wave. MEP abnormalities are useful for an electrophysiological evaluation of myelopathy patients. Moreover, MEPs may be effective parameters in spinal pathology for deciding the operative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet 1:1106–1107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF (1986) Measurement of central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis by magnetic brain stimulation. Lancet 2:355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Linden RD, Zhang YP, Burke DA et al (1999) Magnetic motor evoked potential monitoring in the rat. J Neurosurg 91:205–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Staudt M, Krageloh-Mann I, Holthausen H et al (2004) Searching for motor functions in dysgenic cortex: a clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg 101:69–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen KM, Nasathurai S, Chavin JM et al (1998) The usefulness of central motor conduction studies in the localization of cord involvement in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Muscle Nerve 21:1220–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein CM, Fernandez-Beer E (1991) Cervical magnetic stimulation: the role of the natural foramen. Neurology 41:677–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakolski DJ, Jarrat JA (1989) Clinical evaluation of magnetic stimulation in cervical spondylosis. Br J Neurosurg 3:541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lazzaro VD, Restuccia D, Colosimo C et al (1992) The contribution of magnetic stimulationof the motor cortex to the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Correlation of central motor conduction to distal and proximal upper limb muscles with clinical and MRI findings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85:311–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura J (1984) Principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies. Ann Neurol 16:415–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka S, Fujimoto Y, Shirasu K et al (1997) Assessment of cervical flexion myelopathy for the motor function using transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 73(2),(3):S404 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kameyama O, Shibano K, Kawakita H et al (1995) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in cervical spondylosis and spinal canal stenosis. Spine 20:1004–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, Hashidate H et al (2008) Assessment of cervical myelopathy using transcranial magnetic stimulation and prediction of prognosis after laminoplasty. Spine 33:E15–E20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taniguchi S, Tani T, Ushida T et al (2002) Motor evoked potentials elicited from erector spinae muscle in patients with thoracic myelopathy. Spinal Cord 40:567–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujimoto Y, Oka S, Tanaka N et al (2002) Pathophysiology and treatment for cervical flexion myelopathy. Eur Spine J 11(3):276–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tavy DL, Wagner GL, Keunen RW et al (1994) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiological correlations. Muscle Nerve 17:235–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kameyama O (1995) Prediction of post-operative recovery rate in cervical myelopathy: is prognosis prediction possible? Electrodiagnosis Spine [Sekizui denki shindangaku] 17:81–84 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lo YL, Chan LL, Lim W et al (2006) Transcranial magnetic stimulation screening for cord compression in cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Sci 244:17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Morita H et al (2001) Mechanism of prolonged central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1035–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakanishi K, Tanaka N, Kamei N et al (2007) Significant correlation between corticospinal tract conduction block and prolongation of central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurol Sci 256:71–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakanishi K, Nobuhiro T, Fujiwara Y et al (2006) Corticospinal tract conduction block results in the prolongation of central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 117:623–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka N, Yamada K (2007) Preoperative electrophysiological assessments by motor evoked potentials in elderly patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Monthly Book Orthopaedics 20(13):15–23 (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Yasunaga U et al (2005) Functional diagnosis using multimodal spinal cord evoked potentials in cervical myelopathy. J Orthop Sci 10:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Vohanka S et al (1998) The value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in pre-clinical spondylotic cervical cord compression. Eur Spine J 7(6):493–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen R, Cros D, Curra A et al (2008) The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 119(3):504–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K et al (1983) Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine 8:1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ono K, Ebara S, Juji T et al (1987) Myelopathy hand. New clinical sighs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Jt Surg Br 69:215–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshio Nakamae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamae, T., Tanaka, N., Nakanishi, K. et al. Quantitative assessment of myelopathy patients using motor evoked potentials produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur Spine J 19, 685–690 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1246-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1246-8

Keywords

Navigation