Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) has a high incidence during pregnancy and in some women pain will persist for years. Most studies have used pain as the outcome measure, and little attention is given to functioning or disability. A better understanding of prognostic factors for recovery seems important for clinical care and treatment. The aim of the present paper was to identify prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum PGP and disability, and to determine the impacts of prognostic factors when pain intensity and disability are used as outcome measures. Seventy-eight women with diagnosed PGP were included 6–16 weeks postpartum. Possible prognostic factors were obtained through clinical tests and questionnaires at baseline. The clinical tests were posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test, active straight leg raise (ASLR) test and pain provocation of long dorsal sacroiliac ligament (LDL). One year postpartum outcome measures were obtained by Oswestry disability index (ODI ver 2.0) and worst evening pain (VAS 0–100). Multiple linear regression and logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant prognostic factors. At baseline 60% believed they would recover and 40% were uncertain or believed they would not recover. Fifty per cent had a history of low back pain (LBP), and 20% had high emotional distress (HSCL25-item ≥1.75). About 75% had positive LDL and P4 at both sides and 24% had pain located to all three pelvic joints. Forty per cent had ASLR scores of at least 4 (sum score range 0–10). Multivariate analyses showed consistently that ASLR and belief in improvement were statistical significant predictors for both disability and pain as outcome measures. ASLR score <4 predicted 10 points lower ODI and 19 points lower evening pain compared with having ASLR score of at least 4. Pain location was a statistical significant predictor in only one analysis. History of LBP or high psychological distress was not prognostic for recovery. ASLR test and belief in improvement are predictors of clinical significance in women having PGP postpartum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J (2001) Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:505–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Albert HB, Godskesen M, Korsholm L, Westergaard JG (2006) Risk factors in developing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:539–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert HB, Godskesen M, Westergaard JG (2002) Incidence of four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Spine 27:2831–2834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura A, Locke EA (2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol 88:87–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastiaenen CH, De Bie RA, Wolters PM, Vlaeyen JW, Leffers P, Stelma F, Bastiaanssen JM, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA (2006) Effectiveness of a tailor-made intervention for pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial [ISRCTN08477490]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breen TW, Ransil BJ, Groves PA, Oriol NE (1994) Factors associated with back pain after childbirth. Anesthesiology 81:29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchner M, Neubauer E, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Schiltenwolf M (2007) Age as a predicting factor in the therapy outcome of multidisciplinary treatment of patients with chronic low back pain—a prospective longitudinal clinical study in 405 patients. Clin Rheumatol 26:385–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cedraschi C, Allaz AF (2005) How to identify patients with a poor prognosis in daily clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:577–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, de Cohen LA, Le Parc JM, Paolaggi JB (1994) Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. Br Med J 308:577–580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grotle M, Brox JI, Veierod MB, Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Vollestad NK (2005) Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time. Spine 30:976–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2004) Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 29:E492–E501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2005) Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 30:130–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutke A, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B (2008) Predicting persistent pregnancy-related low back pain. Spine 33:E386–E393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, McGill SM (2005) Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1753–1762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mens JM, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ (2000) Diagonal trunk muscle exercises in peripartum pelvic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 80:1164–1173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Koes BW, Stam HJ (2001) Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine 26:1167–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Koes BW, Stam HJ (2002) Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. Spine 27:196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ, Ginai AZ (1999) The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints. Eur Spine J 8:468–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mogren IM (2006) BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long-term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J 15:1093–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB (1992) Postpartum low-back pain. Spine 17:53–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB, Karlsson K (1991) Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine 16:549–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ostgaard HC, Roos-Hansson E, Zetherstrom G (1996) Regression of back and posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. Spine 21:2777–2780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E (1994) The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women. Eur Spine J 3:258–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson HS, Eskild A, Heiberg E, Eberhard-Gran M (2006) Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact on function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:160–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rost CC, Jacqueline J, Kaiser A, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Prognosis of women with pelvic pain during pregnancy: a long-term follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:771–777

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stuge B, Laerum E, Kirkesola G, Vollestad N (2004) The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 29:351–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas E, Silman AJ, Croft PR, Papageorgiou AC, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ (1999) Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. Br Med J 318:1662–1667

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. To WW, Wong MW (2003) Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:1086–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Turgut F, Turgut M, Cetinsahin M (1998) A prospective study of persistent back pain after pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 80:45–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 17:794–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vleeming A, de Vries HJ, Mens JM, van Wingerden JP (2002) Possible role of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament in women with peripartum pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, Mens JMA, van Dieën JH, Wuisman PIJM, Ostgaard HC (2004) Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J 13:575–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation and the Norwegian Women’s Public Health Association for financial support to the study. The study complies with the current laws and requirements of medical research in Norway and has been approved by the regional ethics committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section for Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1153, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway

    Nina K. Vøllestad & Britt Stuge

  2. Centre for Clinical Research, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Britt Stuge

Authors
  1. Nina K. Vøllestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Britt Stuge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina K. Vøllestad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vøllestad, N.K., Stuge, B. Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 18, 718–726 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0911-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0911-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation