Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents’ and adolescents’ views and perceptions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies have addressed the way in which families of children with cancer make treatment decisions, and how we can meet parents’ and young peoples’ decisional involvement needs. We aimed to explore parents’ and adolescents’ views and perceptions of making medical decisions in pediatric oncology.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 parents of children diagnosed with cancer in the past 12 months, and 5 adolescents diagnosed in the past 12 months. Our interview schedule was underpinned by Elwyn and Miron-Shatz’s decision-making model. The model acknowledges the deliberation (process of coming to a decision) and determination (making a choice) phases of decision-making. We conducted a thematic analysis.

Results

Our findings indicate that information provision is not enough to facilitate parents’ decision-making involvement. Many parents sought additional information to meet their individual needs and preferences. While many parents and young people desired decisional involvement, they trusted the doctors to make treatment decisions. Feelings of distress, inadequacy, and lack of choice impacted decision-making participation. Regardless, many parents in our study were satisfied with treatment decisions, but this was largely dependent on positive treatment outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study contributes to understanding how families of a child with cancer make treatment decisions. Families tend to rely on doctors to make treatment decisions, but often seek additional information to help them feel involved in the decision process. Findings highlight that decision-making in pediatric oncology should focus on involving families in the deliberation phase, rather than just determination of choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spinetta JJ, Masera G, Jankovic M, Oppenheim D, Martins AG, Arush B, Weyl M, van Dongen-Melman J, Epelman C, Medin G (2003) Valid informed consent and participative decision-making in children with cancer and their parents: a report of the SIOP working committee on psychosocial issues in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 40(4):244–246

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S (2012) Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 27(10):1361–1367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitney SN, Ethier AM, Frugé E, Berg S, McCullough LB, Hockenberry M (2006) Decision making in pediatric oncology: who should take the lead? The decisional priority in pediatric oncology model. J Clin Oncol 24(1):160–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pyke-Grimm KA, Stewart JL, Kelly KP, Degner LF (2006) Parents of children with cancer: factors influencing their treatment decision making roles. J Pediatr Nurs 21(5):350–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elwyn G, Miron-Shatz T (2010) Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect 13(2):139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coyne I, O’Mathúna DP, Gibson F, Shields L, Leclercq E, Sheaf G (2016) Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11

  7. Lipstein EA, Brinkman WB, Britto MT (2012) What is known about parents’ treatment decisions? A narrative review of pediatric decision making. Med Decis Mak 32(2):246–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zwaanswijk M, Tates K, van Dulmen S, Hoogerbrugge PM, Kamps WA, Bensing JM (2007) Young patients’, parents’, and survivors’ communication preferences in paediatric oncology: results of online focus groups. BMC Pediatr 7(1):35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakefield CE, Butow P, Fleming CA, Daniel G, Cohn RJ (2012) Family information needs at childhood cancer treatment completion. Pediatr Blood Cancer 58(4):621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson EG, Wakefield CE, Signorelli C, Cohn RJ, Patenaude A, Foster C, Pettit T, Fardell JE (2018) Strategies to facilitate shared decision-making about pediatric oncology clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 101:1157–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pyke-Grimm KA, Degner L, Small A, Mueller B (1999) Preferences for participation in treatment decision making and information needs of parents of children with cancer: a pilot study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 16(1):13–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller KS, Vannatta K, Vasey M, Yeager N, Compas BE, Gerhardt CA (2012) Health literacy variables related to parents’ understanding of their child’s cancer prognosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59(5):914–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kupst MJ, Patenaude AF, Walco GA, Sterling C (2003) Clinical trials in pediatric cancer: parental perspectives on informed consent. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 25(10):787–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brand SR, Fasciano K, Mack JW (2017) Communication preferences of pediatric cancer patients: talking about prognosis and their future life. Support Care Cancer 25(3):769–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coyne I, Amory A, Gibson F, Kiernan G (2016) Information-sharing between healthcare professionals, parents and children with cancer: more than a matter of information exchange. Eur J Cancer Care 25(1):141–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver MS, Baker JN, Gattuso JS, Gibson DV, Sykes AD, Hinds PS (2015) Adolescents’ preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer. Cancer 121(24):4416–4424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sisk BA, Bluebond-Langner M, Wiener L, Mack J, Wolfe J (2016) Prognostic disclosures to children: a historical perspective. Pediatrics 138:e20161278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McKenna K, Collier J, Hewitt M, Blake H (2010) Parental involvement in paediatric cancer treatment decisions. Eur J Cancer Care 19(5):621–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mack JW, Cronin AM, Kang TI (2016) Decisional regret among parents of children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(33):4023–4029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spencer L, Ritchie J (2002) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge, pp 187–208

  21. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C (2017) Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant:1–15

  22. Patistea E, Babatsikou F (2003) Parents’ perceptions of the information provided to them about their child’s leukaemia. Eur J Oncol Nurs 7(3):172–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Knapp C, Madden V, Marcu M, Wang H, Curtis C, Sloyer P, Shenkman E (2011) Information seeking behaviors of parents whose children have life-threatening illnesses. Pediatr Blood Cancer 56(5):805–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kilicarslan-Toruner E, Akgun-Citak E (2013) Information-seeking behaviours and decision-making process of parents of children with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(2):176–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Decker C, Phillips CR, Haase JE (2004) Information needs of adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 21(6):327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson E, Wakefield C, Cohn R, O’Brien T, Ziegler D, Fardell J (2018) The development of Delta: using agile to develop a decision aid for pediatric oncology clinical trial enrollment. JMIR Res Protoc 7(5):e119–e119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S (2015) Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci 11(1):114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Friend BD, Baweja A, Schiller G, Bergman J, Litwin MS, Goldman JW, Davies S, Casillas J (2016) Clinical trial enrollment of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: a systematic review of the literature and proposed solutions. Clin Oncol Adolesc Young Adults 55:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rodgers CC, Laing CM, Herring RA, Tena N, Leonardelli A, Hockenberry M, Hendricks-Ferguson V (2016) Understanding effective delivery of patient and family education in pediatric oncology: a systematic review from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 33(6):432–446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ringnér A, Karlsson S, Graneheim UH (2015) A person-centred intervention for providing information to parents of children with cancer. experiences and effects. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19(3):318–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Day E, Jones L, Langner R, Bluebond-Langner M (2016) Current understanding of decision-making in adolescents with cancer: a narrative systematic review. Palliat Med 30(10):920–934

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Broadhurst PL (1957) Emotionality and the Yerkes-Dodson law. J Exp Psychol 54(5):345–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baker JN, Leek AC, Salas HS, Drotar D, Noll R, Rheingold SR, Kodish ED (2013) Suggestions from adolescents, young adults, and parents for improving informed consent in phase 1 pediatric oncology trials. Cancer 119(23):4154–4161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dimoska A, Tattersall MH, Butow PN, Shepherd H, Kinnersley P (2008) Can a “prompt list” empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions? Cancer 113(2):225–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kästel A, Enskär K, Björk O (2011) Parents’ views on information in childhood cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(4):290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Prentice TM, Gillam L (2018) Can the ethical best practice of shared decision-making lead to moral distress? J Bioeth Inq:1–10

  37. Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, Frosch D, Légaré F, Montori VM, Trevena L, Elwyn G (2012) Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 344:e256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Coyne I, Amory A, Kiernan G, Gibson F (2014) Children’s participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals’ perspectives and experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs 18(3):273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelly KP, Mowbray C, Pyke-Grimm K, Hinds PS (2017) Identifying a conceptual shift in child and adolescent-reported treatment decision making: “having a say, as I need at this time”. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ingersgaard MV, Tulstrup M, Schmiegelow K, Larsen HB (2018) A qualitative study of decision-making on phase III randomized clinical trial participation in paediatric oncology: adolescents’ and parents’ perspectives and preferences. J Adv Nurs 74(1):110–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grady C, Wiener L, Abdoler E, Trauernicht E, Zadeh S, Diekema DS, Wilfond BS, Wendler D (2014) Assent in research: the voices of adolescents. J Adolesc Health 54(5):515–520

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Budden LM, Hayes BA, Buettner PG (2014) Women’s decision satisfaction and psychological distress following early breast cancer treatment: a treatment decision support role for nurses. Int J Nurs Pract 20(1):8–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane Library

  44. Rabin C, Horowitz S, Marcus B (2013) Recruiting young adult cancer survivors for behavioral research. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 20(1):33–36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wakefield CE, Fardell JE, Doolan EL, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Cohn RJ, King M (2017) Participation in psychosocial oncology and quality-of-life research: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 18(3):e153–e165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Pirathat Techakesari for his assistance on this project.

Funding

This project is supported by the Cancer Institute NSW Translational Program Grant. Experimental therapeutics for Myc-driven childhood cancer, 10/TPG/1-13, Professor Glenn Marshall. Professor Claire Wakefield is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1143767). Dr. Joanna Fardell is supported by The Kids Cancer Project. The Behavioural Sciences Unit is supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, the Kids Cancer Alliance, and a Cancer Council New South Wales Program Grant PG16-02 with the support of the Estate of the Late Harry McPaul.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eden G. Robertson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Control of the data

The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review it if requested.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robertson, E.G., Wakefield, C.E., Shaw, J. et al. Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents’ and adolescents’ views and perceptions. Support Care Cancer 27, 4331–4340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04728-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04728-x

Keywords

Navigation