Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychosocial factors associated with adherence for self-management behaviors in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cognitive and affective psychosocial factors have been found to underlie adherence to preventive behaviors in women at risk of developing lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine if these factors are associated with adherence to self-management behaviors for women diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

Methods

Women with BCRL were recruited through a community-based breast cancer organization and three Australian lymphedema treatment clinics. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing demographics, medical history, adherence to self-management behaviors, psychosocial variables (personal control, treatment control, consequences, distress, and self-regulation of affect), and knowledge about lymphedema self-management.

Results

A total of 166 women participated in the study. Participants reported adhering to a mean of five out of seven behaviors, with 19.5 % of participants adhering to all seven behaviors. Adherence to individual behaviors ranged from 65 % (self-lymphatic drainage) to 98.2 % (skin care). Greater knowledge about lymphedema was significantly correlated with higher adherence. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis indicated that only medical history factors (time since diagnosis and having undergone hormone replacement therapy) predicted a significant amount of the variance in adherence.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the importance of patient knowledge for optimal adherence to a self-management regimen. In addition, medical history factors may identify if a patient is at risk of nonadherence. The lack of association of adherence with other psychosocial factors considered in this study indicates that factors underlying adherence in affected women differ considerably from those factors prompting preventive behavior adherence in the at-risk population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ridner SH (2013) Pathophysiology of lymphedema. Semin Oncol Nurs 29:4–11. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2012.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinto AC, de Azambuja E (2011) Improving quality of life after breast cancer: dealing with symptoms. Maturitas 70:343–348. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S (2013) Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14:500–15. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fu MR, Rosedale M (2009) Breast cancer survivors’ experiences of lymphedema-related symptoms. J Pain Symptom Manag 38:849–859. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chachaj A, Małyszczak K, Pyszel K et al (2010) Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Psychooncology 19:299–305. doi:10.1002/pon.1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heiney SP, McWayne J, Cunningham JE et al (2007) Quality of life and lymphedema following breast cancer. Lymphology 40:177–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mak SS, Mo KF, Suen JJS et al (2009) Lymphedema and quality of life in Chinese women after treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 13:110–115. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2009.01.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu MR, Ridner SH, Hu SH et al (2013) Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature from 2004-2011. Psychooncology 22:1466–1484. doi:10.1002/pon.3201

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ridner SH, Dietrich MS, Kidd N (2011) Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema self-care: education, practices, symptoms, and quality of life. Support Care Cancer 19:631–637. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0870-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korpan MI, Crevenna R, Fialka-Moser V (2011) Lymphedema: a therapeutic approach in the treatment and rehabilitation of cancer patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:S69–75. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820be160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. National Lymphedema Network (NLN) (2011) Position statement of the National Lymphedema Network: the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema. http://www.lymphnet.org/pdfDocs/nlntreatment.pdf. Retrieved 14 Jan 2015

  12. Bani HA, Fasching PA, Lux MM et al (2007) Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: assessment and information provision in a specialized breast unit. Patient Educ Couns 66:311–318. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown JC, Cheville AL, Tchou JC et al (2014) Prescription and adherence to lymphedema self-care modalities among women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 22:135–143. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1962-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rose KE, Taylor HM, Twycross RG (1991) Long-term compliance with treatment in obstructive arm lymphoedema in cancer. Palliat Med 5:52–55. doi:10.1177/026921639100500110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman KA, Miller SM, Roussi P, Taylor A (2014) Factors predicting adherence to risk management behaviors of women at increased risk for developing lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 23:61–69. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2321-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, O’Brien PJ et al (2002) Knowledge about preventing and managing lymphedema: a survey of recently diagnosed and treated breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 47:155–163. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00193-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherman KA, Koelmeyer L (2011) The role of information sources and objective risk status on lymphedema risk-minimization behaviors in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 38:E27–36. doi:10.1188/11.ONF.E27-E36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alm-Roijer C, Stagmo M, Udén G, Erhardt L (2004) Better knowledge improves adherence to lifestyle changes and medication in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 3:321–30. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2004.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bains SS, Egede LE (2011) Associations between health literacy, diabetes knowledge, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in a low income population with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 13:335–341. doi:10.1089/dia.2010.0160

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mancuso CA, Sayles W, Allegrante JP (2010) Knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy in asthma self-management and quality of life. J Asthma 47:883–8. doi:10.3109/02770903.2010.492540

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diefenbach MA, Leventhal H (1996) The common-sense model of illness representation: theoretical and practical considerations. J Soc Distress Homeless 5:11–38. doi:10.1007/BF02090456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller SM, Diefenbach MA (1998) C-SHIP: a cognitive-social health information processing approach to cancer. Perspectives in behavioral medicine. Lawrence Earlbaum, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K et al (2002) The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 17:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ashley L, Smith AB, Keding A et al (2013) Psychometric evaluation of the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in cancer patients: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. J Psychosom Res 75:556–62. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sherman KA, Koelmeyer L (2013) Psychosocial predictors of adherence to lymphedema risk minimization guidelines among women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 22:1120–1126. doi:10.1002/pon.3111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tidhar D, Katz-Leurer M (2010) Aqua lymphatic therapy in women who suffer from breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled study. Support Care Cancer 18:383–392. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0669-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ridner SH, McMahon E, Dietrich MS, Hoy S (2008) Home-based lymphedema treatment in patients with cancer-related lymphedema or noncancer-related lymphedema. Oncol Nurs Forum 35:671–80. doi:10.1188/08.ONF.671-680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Byles J, Leigh L, Chojenta C, Loxton D (2014) Adherence to recommended health checks by women in mid-life: data from a prospective study of women across Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 38:39–43. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu MR, Axelrod D, Haber J (2008) Breast-cancer-related lymphedema: information, symptoms, and risk-reduction behaviors. J Nurs Scholarsh 40:341–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brandes K, Mullan B (2014) Can the common-sense model predict adherence in chronically ill patients? A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 8:129–153. doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.820986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Law GU, Tolgyesi CS, Howard RA (2014) Illness beliefs and self-management in children and young people with chronic illness: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev 8:362–380. doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.747123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cullum N, Nelson EA, Fletcher AW, Sheldon TA (2001) Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD000265. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. James S (2011) What are the perceived barriers that prevent patients with lymphoedema from continuing optimal skin care? Wound Pract Res J Aust Wound Manag Assoc 19(152–154):156–158

    Google Scholar 

  34. Newman ML, Brennan M, Passik S (1996) Lymphedema complicated by pain and psychological distress: a case with complex treatment needs. J Pain Symptom Manag 12:376–379. doi:10.1016/S0885-3924(96)00187-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Radina ME, Armer JM, Stewart BR (2014) Making self-care a priority for women at risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Fam Nurs 20:226–249. doi:10.1177/1074840714520716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Moore M (2005) Patients’ perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 57:300–307. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Education and Work, Australia, May 2013. (cat. no. 6227). http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/6227.0~May+2013~Main+Features~Attainment?OpenDocument. Retrieved 14 Jan 2015

  38. Colbert AM, Sereika SM, Erlen JA (2013) Functional health literacy, medication-taking self-efficacy and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Adv Nurs 69:295–304. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06007.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McAuley E, Mullen SP, Szabo AN et al (2011) Self-regulatory processes and exercise adherence in older adults: executive function and self-efficacy effects. Am J Prev Med 41:284–290. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.014

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. King DK, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ et al (2010) Self-efficacy, problem solving, and social-environmental support are associated with diabetes self-management behaviors. Diabetes Care 33:751–753. doi:10.2337/dc09-1746

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA).

Conflict of interest

The authors have full control over primary data and allow the journal to review this primary data if requested. The authors would like to report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Jessica Alcorso & Kerry A. Sherman

  2. Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia

    Kerry A. Sherman

  3. Macquarie University Cancer Institute, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia

    Louise Koelmeyer, Helen Mackie & John Boyages

Authors
  1. Jessica Alcorso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kerry A. Sherman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Louise Koelmeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Helen Mackie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John Boyages
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Alcorso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alcorso, J., Sherman, K.A., Koelmeyer, L. et al. Psychosocial factors associated with adherence for self-management behaviors in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 24, 139–146 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2766-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2766-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation