Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) in Italian long-term cancer survivors: adaptation and psychometric evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) is a self-assessment tool designed to capture the unique and multidimensional aspects of the quality of life of long-term cancer survivors. This paper describes the adaptation and psychometric evaluation of its Italian version.

Methods

After the adaptation (i.e., removal of nonpertinent items and back-translation procedure), the Italian version of IOC has been administered to a sample of Italian long-term cancer survivors (people free from cancer and its treatments for at least 5 years) together with the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, and the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory.

Results

Data on 304 participants were analyzed. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure composed of Uncertainty/Worry about Health & Future (13 items), Personal Growth & Altruism (14 items), and Dissatisfaction & Life Interferences (10 items). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, >0.77) and temporal stability (Spearman's rho, >0.70) were good for all three factors. The obtained three factors correlated with the theoretically pertinent subscales of the other administered tools. To facilitate cross-cultural comparisons, reliability and convergent/divergent validity data for the eight-factor IOC structure already described in literature (Impact of Cancer Version 2) have been also provided.

Conclusions

This study supports the use of the IOC in Italy as a trifactorial instrument that is able to isolate aspects characteristic of the condition of long-term cancer survivorship. However, subsequent studies are needed to confirm these findings as well as shed more light on the validity of the IOC construct and its cultural variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stein KD, Syrjala KL, Andrykowski MA (2008) Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer 112(11 suppl):2577–2592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster C, Wright D, Hill H, Hopkinson J, Roffe L (2009) Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eu J Cancer Care (English) 18:223–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrington CB, Hansen JA, Moskowitz M, Todd BL, Feuerstein M (2010) It's not over when it's over: long-term symptoms in cancer survivors—a systematic review. Int J Psychiatry Med 40:163–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Annunziata MA, Muzzatti B, Bianchet K, Berretta M, Chimienti E, Lleshi A, Tirelli U (2009) Sopravvivere al cancro: una rassegna sulla qualità di vita nella cancer survivorship. Psicologia della Salute 10:55–71

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (1996) The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Traumatic Stress 9:455–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearce NJM, Sanson-Fisher R, Campbell HS (2008) Measuring quality of life in cancer survivors: a methodological review of existing scales. Psycho-Oncol 17:629–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muzzatti B, Annunziata MA (2013) Assessing quality of life in long-term cancer survivors: a review of available tools. Supp Care in Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1912-6

  8. Zebrack BJ, Ganz PA, Bernaards CA, Petersen L, Abraham L (2006) Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors. Psycho-Oncol 15:407–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crespi CM, Ganz PA, Petersen L, Castillo A, Caan B (2008) Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Cancer Scale. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1530–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crespi CM, Smith SK, Petersen L, Zimmerman S, Ganz PA (2010) Measuring the impact of cancer: a comparison of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 4:45–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahl HA, Gudbergsson SB, Dørum A, Fossa SD, Liavaag AH, Sørebø Ø (2012) The impact of cancer scale version 1: psychometric testing of the Norwegian translation in a heterogeneous sample of cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 21(8):1459–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oerlemans S, Smith SK, Crespi CM, Zimmerman S, van de Poll-Franse LV, Ganz PA (2012) Assessing the impact of cancer among Dutch non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors compared with their American counterparts: a cross-national study. Psycho-Oncol. doi:10.1002/pon.3131

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crespi CM, Ganz PA, Petersen L, Smith SK (2013) A procedure for obtaining Impact of Cancer version 2 scores using version 1 responses. Qual Life Res 22(1):103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hahn EA, Bode RK, Du H, Cella D (2006) Evaluating linguistic equivalence of patient-reported outcomes in a cancer clinical trial. Clin Trials 3:280–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazdin AE (1992) Research design in clinical psychology. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinki M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 Health Survey—manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Apolone G, Mosconi P, Ware JE (1997) Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-36, manuale d'uso e guida all'interpretazione dei risultati. Guerini e Associati, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  20. Apolone G, Filiberti A, Cifani S, Ruggiata R, Mosconi P (1998) Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients. Ann Oncol 9:549–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prati G, Pietrantoni L (2013) Italian adaptation and confirmatory factor analysis of the full and the short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. J Loss Trauma. doi:10.1080/15325024.2012.734203

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cronbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrica 16:297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burnand B, Kernan WN, Feinstein AR (1990) Indexes and boundaries for 'quantitative significance' in statistical decisions. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1273–1284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartlett MS (1954) A note on multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. J Royal Statist Soc 16:296–298

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaiser H (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Patricia A. Ganz, MD and Dr. Catherine M. Crespi, PhD for their precious advice on the first draft of the paper and Ms Anna Vallerugo, MA, for her writing assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Antonietta Annunziata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muzzatti, B., Flaiban, C., Romito, F. et al. The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) in Italian long-term cancer survivors: adaptation and psychometric evaluation. Support Care Cancer 21, 3355–3362 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1909-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1909-1

Keywords

Navigation