Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Distress Thermometer in Spanish cancer patients: convergent validity and diagnostic accuracy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

International organizations such as National Comprehensive Cancer Network and NICE recommend implementation of routine screening programs for detecting and managing psychosocial distress among cancer patients. The selection of an adequate screening tool is crucial to the effectiveness of these programs. The present study examines the emotional symptomatology captured by the Distress Thermometer (DT) and its accuracy and validity as a screening tool in cancer. It also explores the possible discrepancy between patient distress and the use of psycho-oncology resources.

Methods

A heterogeneous sample of 962 adult cancer patients completed the DT, the Problem List (PL), the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), and the Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Results

The DT was significantly correlated with BSI-18 symptoms and the emotional problems listed on the PL. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed good diagnostic accuracy for the DT (area under the curve = .82, 95 %CI [.79–.85]). For a selected DT cutoff of 5, standard measures (sensitivity = 90 %, specificity = 64 %, predictive positive value = 35 %, and negative predictive value = 97 %) and Clinical Utility Indexes (utility index negative = .62 and utility index positive = .32) indicated that the DT was adequate for “screening” while it was limited for “case finding.” Finally, 81.30 % of patients with clinical distress had not sought or were not receiving professional psychosocial support at the time of the study.

Conclusion

The DT is appropriate for use as a rapid screening instrument for cancer patients in a Spanish population because it assesses a broad concept of distress including both anxiety and depression symptoms. The diagnostic accuracy of the DT could be improved with minor proposed modifications to the DT and the inclusion of nonemotional ultrashort measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NCCN (2013) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Distress Management V.5.2012 http://www.nccn.org/professionals/phisician_gls/PDF/distress.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2012

  2. Watson M, Jacobsen P (2012) [Editorial for special issue on stress and cancer]. Stress Health 28:353–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson L, Angen M, Cullum J, Goodey E, Koopmans J, Lamont L et al (2004) High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90:2297–2304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychosocial distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology 10:19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell A, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C et al (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet 12:160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadan-Lottick NS, Vanderwerker LC, Block SD, Zhang B, Prigerson HG (2005) Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use in patients with advanced cancer: a report from the coping with cancer study. Cancer 104:2872–2881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharpe M, Strong V, Allen K, Rush R, Postma K, Tulloh A et al (2004) Major depression in outpatients attending a regional cancer center: screening and unmet treatment needs. Br J Cancer 90:314–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bultz B, Holland J (2006) Emotional distress in patients with cancer: the sixth vital sign. Commun Oncol 3:311–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson L, Waller A, Mitchell AJ (2012) Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol 10:1160–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell AJ (2010) Short screening tools for cancer-related distress: a review and diagnostic validity meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:487–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vodermaier A, Linden W, Siu C (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1464–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC (1998) Rapid screening for psychological distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer 82:1904–1908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell AJ (2007) Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. J Clin Oncol 25:4670–4681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman B, Zevon MA, D’Arrigo MC, Cecchini TB (2004) Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN rapid-screening measure. Psycho-Oncology 13:792–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Snowden A, White CA, Christie Z, Murray E, McGowan C, Scott R (2011) The clinical utility of the Distress Thermometer: a review. Br J Nursing 20:220–227

    Google Scholar 

  16. Akizuki N, Akechi T, Nakanishi T, Yoshikawa E, Okamura M, Nakano T et al (2003) Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer. Cancer 97:2605–2613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ransom S, Jacobsen PB, Booth-Jones M (2006) Validation of the Distress Thermometer with bone marrow transplant patients. Psycho-Oncology 15:604–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell AJ (2010) Clinical Utility Index—a new method to calculate the clinical value of diagnostic & screening tests: proof of concept study. Psycho-Oncology 19(2):686

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akizuki N, Yamawaki S, Akechi T, Nakano T, Uchitomi Y (2005) Development of an Impact Thermometer for use in combination with the Distress Thermometer as a brief screening tool for adjustment disorders and/or major depression in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 29:91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauwens S, Baillon C, Distelmans W, Theuns P (2009) The ‘Distress Barometer’: validation of method of combining the Distress Thermometer with a rated complaint scale. Psycho-Oncology 18:534–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McLaren D, Woolley C (2011) Validation of the Distress Thermometer, Impact Thermometer and combinations of these in screening for distress. Psycho-Oncology 20:609–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gil F, Grassi L, Travado L, Tomamichel M, González JM (2005) Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 13:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Granger L, Symonds P (2010) Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the Emotion Thermometers tool. Psycho-Oncology 19:125–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Park B, Granger L, Symonds P (2010) Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part II. What is the optimal combination of Emotion Thermometers? Psycho-Oncology 19:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Derogatis LR (2000) The Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18): administration, scoring and procedures manual. National Computer Systems, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  26. Galdón MJ, Durá E, Andreu Y, Ferrando M, Murgui S, Pérez S et al (2008) Psychometric properties of the Brief Symptoms Inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a Spanish breast cancer sample. J Psychosom Res 65:533–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bevans M, Wehrlen L, Prachenko O, Soeken K, Zabora J, Wallen G (2011) Distress screening in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) caregivers and patients. Psycho-Oncology 20:615–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Merport A, Bober SL, Grose A, Recklitis C (2012) Can the distress thermometer (DT) identify significant psychological distress in long-term cancer survivors? a comparison with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Support Care Cancer 20:195–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Domenech JM (2004) Fundamentos de Diseño y Estadística, UD 3: Fundamentos de la teoría de la probabilidad. Pruebas diagnósticas, Signo, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  30. Franco M, Vivo JM (2007) Análisis de Curvas ROC. Principios básicos y aplicaciones, La Muralla, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  31. Watson D (2005) Positive affectivity: the disposition to experience pleasurable emotional states. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ (eds) Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 106–118

    Google Scholar 

  32. Duckworth A, Steen T, Seligman M (2005) Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1:629–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gessler S, Low J, Daniells E, Williams R, Brough V, Tookman A et al (2008) Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psycho-Oncology 17:538–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell AJ (2010) Screening procedures for psychosocial distress. In: Holland J, Breitbart WS, Jacobsen PB, Lederberg M, Loscalzo MJ, McCorkle R (eds) Psycho-oncology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 389–396

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Zebrack B, Burg MA, Vaitones V (2012) Distress screening: an opportunity for enhancing quality cancer care and promoting the oncology social work profession. J Psychosoc Oncol 30:615–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell AJ, Kaar S, Coggan C, Herdman J (2008) Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders—preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists. Psycho-Oncology 17:226–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the study participants and staff at the FIVO for their cooperation. This research was funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Government of Spain (REF: PSI2010-15355).

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Martínez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez, P., Galdón, M.J., Andreu, Y. et al. The Distress Thermometer in Spanish cancer patients: convergent validity and diagnostic accuracy. Support Care Cancer 21, 3095–3102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1883-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1883-7

Keywords

Navigation