Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical and mental health status of female adolescent/young adult survivors of breast and gynecological cancer: a national, population-based, case-control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Each year, nearly 21,000 adolescents and young adults (AYA) ages 15 to 29 years are diagnosed with cancer. Breast and gynecological cancers account for 25 % of the cancers seen in AYA females. The purpose of this study was to compare the current physical and mental health status of female AYA cancer survivors with non-cancer female controls.

Methods

Using data from the population-based 2009 National Health Interview Survey, 100 cases of female AYA survivors of breast and gynecological cancers were identified [female AYA cancer survivor (FCS) group]. FCS cases were matched with 300 female respondents without a history of cancer on age, education, marital status, and minority status [non-cancer control (NCC) group]. The FCS and NCC groups were compared on a range of physical and mental health status indices using analysis of covariance and binary logistic regression.

Results

FCS group reported significantly poorer physical and mental health status than the matched controls. Relative to the NCC group, FCS survivors had significantly poorer scores on 7 of 8 mental health outcomes and were more likely to meet criteria for serious psychological distress (odds ratio = 4.23, p ≤ 0.001). FCS group also reported greater lifetime and current prevalence of various medical conditions, more health-related disabilities, and greater functional limitations than the NCC group.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of breast and gynecological cancer during adolescence and young adulthood is associated with clinically important deficits in physical and mental health status. Given the young age of this cancer survivor cohort, increased attention should be devoted to minimizing these deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bleyer A, Viny A, Barr R (2006) Cancer in 15- to 29-year-olds by primary site. Oncologist 11:590–601. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-6-590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Institute & LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance (2006) Closing the gap: research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. National Institutes of Health Publication No. 06-6067

  3. Abrams AN, Hazen EP, Penson RT (2007) Psychosocial issues in adolescents with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 33:622–630. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Evan EE, Zeltzer LK (2006) Psychosocial dimensions of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Cancer 107:1663–1671. doi:10.1002/cncr.22107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedstrom M, Ljungman G, von Essen L (2005) Perceptions of distress among adolescents recently diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 27:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattsson E, Ringner A, Ljungman G et al (2007) Positive and negative consequences with regard to cancer during adolescence. Experiences two years after diagnosis. Psycho-Oncology 16:1003–1009. doi:10.1002/pon.1162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Canada AL, Schover LR (2012) The psychosocial impact of interrupted childbearing in long-term female cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 21:134–143. doi:10.1002/pon.1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorman JR, Malcarne VL, Roesch SC et al (2010) Depressive symptoms among young breast cancer survivors: the importance of reproductive concerns. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123:477–485. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0768-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruddy KJ, Gelber S, Ginsburg ES et al (2011) Menopausal symptoms and fertility concerns in premenopausal breast cancer survivors: a comparison to age- and gravidity-matched controls. Menopause 18:105–108. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ef39f8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbott-Anderson K, Kwekkeboom KL (2012) A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol 124:477–489. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goncalves V (2010) Long-term quality of life in gynecological cancer survivors. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22:30–35. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332e626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grover S, Hill-Kayser CE, Vachani C et al (2012) Patient reported late effects of gynecological cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol 124:399–403. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Howard-Anderson J, Ganz PA, Bower JE et al (2012) Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:386–405. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashing-Giwa KT, Lim JW (2009) Examining the impact of socioeconomic status and socioecologic stress on physical and mental health quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:79–88. doi:10.1188/09.ONF.79-88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saquib N, Pierce JP, Saquib J et al (2011) Poor physical health predicts time to additional breast cancer events and mortality in breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 20:252–259. doi:10.1002/pon.1742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Institute of Medicine (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Center for Health Statistics (2010) 2009 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) public use data release. NIH Survey description. Available at: www.cds.gov/nchs/nhis accessed on August 1, 2011

  18. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ et al (2003) Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatr 60:184–189. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ et al (2010) Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr 19:4–22. doi:10.1002/mpr.310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hays RD, Woolley JM (2000) The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? PharmacoEconomics 18:419–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582–592. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coups EJ, Ostroff JS (2005) A population-based estimate of the prevalence of behavioral risk factors among adult cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Prev Med 40:702–711. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hewitt M, Rowland JH (2002) Mental health service use among adult cancer survivors: analyses of the National Health Interview Survey. J Clin Oncol 20:4581–4590. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.03.077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abraham L, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC et al (2009) Accuracy of self-reported breast cancer among women undergoing mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:583–592. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0375-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergmann MM, Calle EE, Mervis CA et al (1998) Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries. Am J Epidemiol 147:556–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Celeste Phillips-Salimi is a postdoctoral fellow and received support from T32 Research Training Program in Behavioral Nursing funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research (2T32 NR007066) at Indiana University.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celeste R. Phillips-Salimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips-Salimi, C.R., Andrykowski, M.A. Physical and mental health status of female adolescent/young adult survivors of breast and gynecological cancer: a national, population-based, case-control study. Support Care Cancer 21, 1597–1604 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1701-7

Keywords

Navigation