Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Increased primary healthcare utilisation among women with a history of breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about the current role of the general practitioner (GP) in breast cancer follow-up care. This study explores primary healthcare use in the period after completion of primary breast cancer treatment.

Methods

A total of 336 women with a history of early-stage breast cancer treated with curative intent were identified in the primary care database of the Registration Network Groningen (RNG) (1998–2007) and matched with a reference population of 983 women without breast cancer on birth year and GP.

Results

Over the entire follow-up period (starting 1 year post-diagnosis), the median numbers of face-to-face contacts, drug prescriptions, and referrals in the patient group were significantly higher than those in the reference group: 4.0 vs. 3.2/year, 12.3 vs. 8.4/year, and 0.4 vs. 0.3/year, Mann–Whitney (M–W) test p < 0.001 for all differences. At least one annual face-to-face contact was observed for 96.7 % of patients and 92.9 % of women from the reference population (Chi-square test p = 0.011). More patients than women from the reference population had face-to-face contacts for reasons related to breast cancer or were prescribed hormone antagonists and aromatase inhibitors to treat breast cancer. The main predictor of higher rates of face-to-face contacts and drug prescriptions was a higher age at diagnosis.

Conclusions

This study shows increased primary healthcare utilisation among women with a history of breast cancer, especially among the elderly. When follow-up is transferred to the primary care setting, new responsibilities of GPs might be incorporated into existing primary healthcare delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knottnerus A, Wijffels JFAM (eds) (2011) Nazorg bij kanker: de rol van de eerstelijn. KWF Kankerbestrijding, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grunfeld E, Mant D, Vessey MP et al (1995) Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract 12:60–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Worster A, Bass MJ, Wood ML (1996) Willingness to follow breast cancer. Survey of family physicians. Can Fam Physician 42:263–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ et al (2009) Primary care physicians' views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 27:3338–3345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Renton JP, Twelves CJ, Yuille FA (2002) Follow-up in women with breast cancer: the patients' perspective. Breast 11:257–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Bock GH, Bonnema J, Zwaan RE et al (2004) Patient's needs and preferences in routine follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 90:1144–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimman ML, Dellaert BG, Boersma LJ et al (2010) Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Acta Oncol 49:328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Hezewijk M, Ranke GM, van Nes JG et al (2011) Patients' needs and preferences in routine follow-up for early breast cancer; an evaluation of the changing role of the nurse practitioner. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:765–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adewuyi-Dalton R, Ziebland S, Grunfeld E et al (1998) Patients' views of routine hospital follow-up: a qualitative study of women with breast cancer in remission. Psychooncology 7:436–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pennery E, Mallet J (2000) A preliminary study of patients' perceptions of routine follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 4:138–145, discussion 146–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao JJ, Bowman MA, Stricker CT et al (2009) Delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: the perspective of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 27:933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Donnelly P, Hiller L, Bathers S et al (2007) Questioning specialists' attitudes to breast cancer follow-up in primary care. Ann Oncol 18:1467–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kantsiper M, McDonald EL, Geller G et al (2009) Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med 24(Suppl 2):S459–S466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Macleod U, Ross S, Twelves C et al (2000) Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records. BMJ 320:1442–1445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Del Giudice L, Bondy SJ, Chen Z et al (2006) Physician care of cancer patients. In: Jaakkimainen L, Upshur R, Klein-Geltink JE et al (eds) Primary care in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, pp 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nord C, Mykletun A, Thorsen L et al (2005) Self-reported health and use of health care services in long-term cancer survivors. Int J Cancer 114:307–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van de Poll-Franse LV, Mols F, Vingerhoets AJ et al (2006) Increased health care utilisation among 10-year breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 14:436–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peuckmann V, Ekholm O, Sjogren P et al (2009) Health care utilisation and characteristics of long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in Denmark. Eur J Cancer 45:625–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roorda C, de Bock GH, van der Veen WJ et al (2012) Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer 20:705–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamberts H, Wood M (1987) CPC. International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. WHO collaborating centre for drug statistics methodology (1999) ATC Index with DDS. World Health Organisation, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Bock GH, Musters RF, Bos HJ et al (2012) Psychotropic medication during endocrine treatment for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 20:1533–1540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg Nederland (2008) Richtlijn mammacarcinoom 2008. Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (2008) NHG-Standaard. Diagnostiek van mammacarcinoom. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  26. Swinglehurst D, Greenhalgh T, Russell J et al (2011) Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study. BMJ 343:d6788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Smet PA, Dautzenberg M (2004) Repeat prescribing: scale, problems and quality management in ambulatory care patients. Drugs 64:1779–1800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Genootschap NH (2012) NHG-Standaard. De overgang. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kornblith AB, Herndon JE 2nd, Weiss RB et al (2003) Long-term adjustment of survivors of early-stage breast carcinoma, 20 years after adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 98:679–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mehnert A, Koch U (2008) Psychological comorbidity and health-related quality of life and its association with awareness, utilization, and need for psychosocial support in a cancer register-based sample of long-term breast cancer survivors. J Psychosom Res 64:383–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van den Bosch WJHM, Freeman GK (2004) Coordination and continuity of care. In: Jones R, Britten N, Culpepper L et al (eds) Oxford textbook of primary medical care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patnaik JL, Byers T, Diguiseppi C et al (2011) The influence of comorbidities on overall survival among older women diagnosed with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1101–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grunfeld E, Earle CC (2010) The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grunfeld E (2005) Cancer survivorship: a challenge for primary care physicians. Br J Gen Pract 55:741–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith SL, Wai ES, Alexander C et al (2011) Caring for survivors of breast cancer: perspective of the primary care physician. Curr Oncol 18:e218–e226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tate AR, Martin AG, Murray-Thomas T et al (2009) Determining the date of diagnosis—is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care. BMC Med Res Methodol 9:42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lawrenson R, Williams T, Farmer R (1999) Clinical information for research; the use of general practice databases. J Public Health Med 21:299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pascoe SW, Neal RD, Heywood PL et al (2008) Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data. Fam Pract 25:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu J, Bartoces M, Neale AV et al (2005) Natural history of menopause symptoms in primary care patients: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Pract 18:374–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. van der Veen WJ, Meyboom-de Jong B (2004) Age and gender. In: Jones R, Britten N, Culpepper L et al (eds) Oxford textbook of primary medical care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 153–161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No funding was received for this study. The authors thank the Registration Network Groningen for providing data for our study. We also thank the participating general practitioners and practice assistants for their help during data collection in general practices.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Carriene Roorda, Annette J. Berendsen, Feikje Groenhof & Klaas van der Meer

  2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Carriene Roorda & Geertruida H. de Bock

Authors
  1. Carriene Roorda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annette J. Berendsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feikje Groenhof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Klaas van der Meer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Geertruida H. de Bock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carriene Roorda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roorda, C., Berendsen, A.J., Groenhof, F. et al. Increased primary healthcare utilisation among women with a history of breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 21, 941–949 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1609-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1609-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation