Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Symptom clusters and symptom interference of HCC patients undergoing TACE: a cross-sectional study in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the symptom and symptom clusters of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before and after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and to discuss the relationship between symptoms, symptom clusters, and symptom interference.

Materials and methods

Patients with HCC who received TACE were asked to rate their symptoms using the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory and the symptom checklist particularly for HCC. To determine the interrelationships among symptoms and identify the symptom clusters, a principal component analysis with varimax rotation was carried out on the symptom items. Spearman correlation analysis was done to assess the relationship between symptom clusters and symptom interference.

Results

A total of 155 patients finished the whole procedure between November 2010 and May 2011. Before TACE, the five most severe symptoms, ranked in order, were fatigue (3.40 ± 2.26), distress (3.35 ± 2.60), sadness (3.01 ± 2.66), sleep disturbance (2.63 ± 2.57), and lack of appetite (2.26 ± 2.38). After TACE, fatigue (4.88 ± 2.31) was the most serious symptom, followed by sleep disturbance (4.80 ± 2.25), distress (4.59 ± 2.32), sadness (4.45 ± 2.16), lack of appetite (4.25 ± 2.51). Two symptom clusters were found before TACE: psychological symptom cluster and sickness symptom cluster. Two new symptom clusters were found after TACE: upper gastrointestinal symptom cluster and liver function impairment symptom cluster, with the two original symptom clusters remained relatively stable. The highest symptom interference items pre- and post-TACE were work and enjoyment of life, followed by mood. The symptoms of distress, sadness, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and lack of appetite were all significantly associated with the total interference (r = 0.443–0.615, p < 0.01 or p < 0.05). Symptom clusters were significantly correlated with the total symptom interference before and after TACE (r = 0.176–0.638, p < 0.01 or p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Psychological symptom cluster and sickness symptom cluster are common for HCC patients before and after TACE. Liver function impairment and upper gastrointestinal symptom clusters are directly related to TACE treatment. Both the symptoms and symptom clusters have significant interference on the daily life of HCC patients undergoing TACE. However, more work is needed to further clarify the symptom clusters associated with TACE and to test the effectiveness of TACE in easing symptoms and improving quality of life of HCC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steel JL, Carr BI, Olek MC et al (2007) Health-related quality of life in patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinoma. US Gastroenterol Rev Issue II:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khan SA, Taylor-Robinson SD, Toledano MB et al (2002) Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours. J Hepatol 37:806–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35:421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruix J, Llovet JM (2002) Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:519–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19(3):329–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J et al (2008) Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:698–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR et al (2010) Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis 30:61–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Llovet JM, Bruix J (2003) Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37:429–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X et al (2002) Arterial embolization or chemoembolization versus systemic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miraglia R, Pietrosi G, Maruzzelli L et al (2007) Efficacy of transcatheter embolization/chemoembolization (TAE/TACE) for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 13(21):2952–2955

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryder SD (2003) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in adults. Gut 52(Suppl 3):iii1–iii8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao GS, Yang XH, Li C et al (2010) Application of gelatin sponge particles to the interventional treatment of hepatic carcinoma. Zhongguo Xin Yao Za Zhi 19(17):1571–1574

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li RH, Liu XD, Lu CY (2011) Complications of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for liver cancer. Shi Yong Yi Xue Za Zhi 26(1):163

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu YG, Jin L, Wang L et al (2011) Clinical observation and nursing in interventional therapy of liver cancer. Zhonghua Quan Ke Yi Xue Za Zhi 9(2):309–311

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H, McGuire DB, Tulman L et al (2005) Symptom clusters: concept analysis and clinical implications for cancer nursing. Cancer Nurs 28:270–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryu Eunjung, Kim K, Cho MS et al (2010) Symptom clusters and quality of life in Korean patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Nurs 33(1):3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yount S, Cella D, Webster K et al (2002) Assessment of patient-reported clinical outcome in pancreatic and other hepatobiliary cancers: the FACT hepatobiliary symptom index. J Pain Symptom Manag 24(1):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahara S, Kawai N, Sato M et al (2012) Prospective evaluation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with multiple anti-cancer drugs (Epirubicin, Cisplatin, Mitomycin C, 5-Fluorouracil) compared with TACE with Epirubicin for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00270-012-0352-x

  19. Meng MB, Wen QL, Cui YL et al (2011) Meta-analysis: traditional Chinese medicine for improving immune response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Explore 7(1):37–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xie F, Zang J, Guo X et al (2012) Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and microsphere embolization for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(3):455–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang XS, Wang Y, Guo H et al (2004) Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory: validation and application of symptom measurement in cancer patients. Cancer 101:1890–1901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barsevick AM, Dudley W, Beck S et al (2004) A randomized clinical trial of energy conservation for patients with cancer-related fatigue. Cancer 100(6):1302–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim HJ, Barsevick AM, Lorraine T et al (2008) Treatment-related symptom clusters in breast cancer: a secondary analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag 36(5):468–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JE, Dodd MJ, Aouizerat BE et al (2009) A review of the prevalence and impact of multiple symptoms in oncology patients. J Pain Symptom Manag 37(4):715–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barsevick AM (2007) The concept of symptom cluster. Semin Oncol Nurs 23(2):89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (No. B90302ZD), the Research Grant of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (No.2008JG007), and Innovation Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (No.10ZS56).

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work; there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yan Xu or Zhixia Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, W., Li, J., Hu, C. et al. Symptom clusters and symptom interference of HCC patients undergoing TACE: a cross-sectional study in China. Support Care Cancer 21, 475–483 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1541-5

Keywords

Navigation