Skip to main content
Log in

Head-to-head comparisons of quality of life instruments for young adult survivors of childhood cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies examine the relevance of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC). This study compared the psychometric properties of two survivor-specific instruments, the Quality of Life–Cancer Survivor (QOL-CS) and Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivor (QLACS).

Methods

Data from 151 YASCC who enrolled in cancer/tumor registries of two medical centers were used. We examined construct validity by conducting confirmatory factor analysis using indices of chi-square statistic, comparative fit index, and root mean square error of approximation. We examined convergent/discriminant validity by comparing Pearson’s correlation coefficients of homogeneous (e.g., physical functioning and pain) of both instruments versus heterogeneous domains (e.g., physical and psychological functioning). We assessed known-groups validity by examining the extent to which HRQOL differed by late effects and comorbid conditions and calculated relative validity (RV) defined as contrasting F-statistics of individual domains to the domain with the lowest F-statistic. Superior known-groups validity is observed if a domain of one instrument demonstrates a higher RV than other domains of the instruments.

Results

YASCC data cannot replicate the constructs both instruments intend to measure, suggesting poor construct validity. Correlations of between-homogeneous and between-heterogeneous domains of both instruments were not discernible, suggesting poor convergent/discriminant validity. Both instruments were equally able to differentiate HRQOL between YASCC with and without late effects and comorbid conditions, suggesting similar known-groups validity.

Conclusions

Neither instrument is superior. Item response theory is suggested to select high-quality items from different instruments to improve HRQOL measure for YASCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz CL (1999) Long-term survivors of childhood cancer: the late effects of therapy. Oncologist 4:45–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiner SL, Simone JV, National Cancer Policy Board (U.S.) (2003) Childhood cancer survivorship: improving care and quality of life. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaauwbroek R, Stant AD, Groenier KH, Kamps WA, Meyboom B, Postma A (2007) Health-related quality of life and adverse late effects in adult (very) long-term childhood cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 43:122–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boman KK (2007) Assessing psychological and health-related quality of life (HRQL) late effects after childhood cancer. Acta Paediatr 96:1265–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishida Y, Sakamoto N, Kamibeppu K, Kakee N, Iwai T, Ozono S, Maeda N, Okamura J, Asami K, Inada H, Honda M, Horibe K (2010) Late effects and quality of life of childhood cancer survivors: part 2. Impact of radiotherapy. Int J Hematol 92:95–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pemberger S, Jagsch R, Frey E, Felder-Puig R, Gadner H, Kryspin-Exner I, Topf R (2005) Quality of life in long-term childhood cancer survivors and the relation of late effects and subjective well-being. Support Care Cancer 13:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Siimes MA, Hovi L, Holmberg C, Boyd H, Makela A, Rautonen J (1996) Health-related quality of life of adults surviving malignancies in childhood. Eur J Cancer 32A:1354–1358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkin TD, Phipps S, Mulhern RK, Fairclough D (1997) Psychological functioning of adolescent and young adult survivors of pediatric malignancy. Med Pediatr Oncol 29:582–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Novakovic B, Fears TR, Horowitz ME, Tucker MA, Wexler LH (1997) Late effects of therapy in survivors of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 19:220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stam H, Grootenhuis MA, Caron HN, Last BF (2006) Quality of life and current coping in young adult survivors of childhood cancer: positive expectations about the further course of the disease were correlated with better quality of life. Psychooncology 15:31–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeltzer LK, Chen E, Weiss R, Guo MD, Robison LL, Meadows AT, Mills JL, Nicholson HS, Byrne J (1997) Comparison of psychologic outcome in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia versus sibling controls: a cooperative Children's Cancer Group and National Institutes of Health Study. J Clin Oncol 15:547–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Felder-Puig R, Formann AK, Mildner A, Bretschneider W, Bucher B, Windhager R, Zoubek A, Puig S, Topf R (1998) Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment of young patients after treatment of bone cancer. Cancer 83:69–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maunsell E, Pogany L, Barrera M, Shaw AK, Speechley KN (2006) Quality of life among long-term adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2527–2535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moe PJ, Holen A, Glomstein A, Madsen B, Hellebostad M, Stokland T, Wefring KW, Steen-Johnsen J, Nielsen B, Howlid H, Borsting S, Hapnes C (1997) Long-term survival and quality of life in patients treated with a national all protocol 15–20 years earlier: IDM/HDM and late effects? Pediatr Hematol Oncol 14:513–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M (1995) Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 4:523–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Avis NE, Smith KW, McGraw S, Smith RG, Petronis VM, Carver CS (2005) Assessing quality of life in adult cancer survivors (QLACS). Qual Life Res 14:1007–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zebrack BJ, Donohue JE, Gurney JG, Chesler MA, Bhatia S, Landier W (2010) Psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer (IOC-CS) scale for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Qual Life Res 19:207–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crespi CM, Ganz PA, Petersen L, Castillo A, Caan B (2008) Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1530–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmbeck GN (2002) A developmental perspective on adolescent health and illness: an introduction to the special issues. J Pediatr Psychol 27:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maurice-Stam H, Grootenhuis MA, Caron HN, Last BF (2007) Course of life of survivors of childhood cancer is related to quality of life in young adulthood. J Psychosoc Oncol 25:43–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stam H, Hartman EE, Deurloo JA, Groothoff J, Grootenhuis MA (2006) Young adult patients with a history of pediatric disease: impact on course of life and transition into adulthood. J Adolesc Health 39:4–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maurice-Stam H, Oort FJ, Last BF, Grootenhuis MA (2009) A predictive model of health-related quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 18:339–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grant MD, Piotrowski ZH, Chappell R (1995) Self-reported health and survival in the longitudinal study of aging, 1984–1986. J Clin Epidemiol 48:375–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fayers PM, Machin D (2007) Quality of life: the assessment, analysis, and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hu L, Bentler BM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  29. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF (1992) The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 30:MS253–MS265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Drew S (2007) ‘Having cancer changed my life, and changed my life forever’: survival, illness legacy and service provision following cancer in childhood. Chronic Illn 3:278–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zebrack BJ, Casillas J, Nohr L, Adams H, Zeltzer LK (2004) Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psychooncology 13:689–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miedema B, Hamilton R, Easley J (2007) From “invincibility” to “normalcy”: coping strategies of young adults during the cancer journey. Palliat Support Care 5:41–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Parry C, Chesler MA (2005) Thematic evidence of psychosocial thriving in childhood cancer survivors. Qual Health Res 15:1055–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Enskar K, Bertero C (2010) Young adult survivors of childhood cancer; experiences affecting self-image, relationships, and present life. Cancer Nurs 33:E18–E24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chou LN, Hunter A (2009) Factors affecting quality of life in Taiwanese survivors of childhood cancer. J Adv Nurs 65:2131–2141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Casillas JN, Zebrack BJ, Zeltzer LK (2006) Health-related quality of life for Latino survivors of childhood cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 24:125–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cantrell MA, Conte TM (2009) Between being cured and being healed: the paradox of childhood cancer survivorship. Qual Health Res 19:312–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang IC, Wu AW, Frangakis C (2006) Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population. Qual Life Res 15:15–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP (2000) Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 38:II28–II42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. McHorney CA (2003) Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Ann Intern Med 139:403–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, Reeve BB (2007) Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 16(Suppl 1):95–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Martin M, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Ware JE Jr, Maclean R, Li T (2007) Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale. Qual Life Res 16:647–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP, Tran K, Bloser N, Merrill W, Peabody J (2006) Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures. Qual Life Res 15:191–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kazak AE, Derosa BW, Schwartz LA, Hobbie W, Carlson C, Ittenbach RF, Mao JJ, Ginsberg JP (2010) Psychological outcomes and health beliefs in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer and controls. J Clin Oncol 28:2002–2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the University of Florida and Moffitt Cancer Centers Collaborative Initiative (IH, GQ, KE, DM, ES, and PS) and the National Institute of Health K23 HD057146 (IH).

Conflict of interests

Principal author and all co-authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Chan Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, IC., Quinn, G.P., Krull, K. et al. Head-to-head comparisons of quality of life instruments for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Support Care Cancer 20, 2061–2071 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1315-5

Keywords

Navigation