Skip to main content
Log in

Association of isolated preauricular tags and nephrourological anomalies: case-control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isolated preauricular tags (IPT) are considered minor malformations whereas nephrourological anomalies (NUA) are considered major malformations. Their incidences fluctuate between 5 and 10 per 1,000 and 1–3 per 100 live births, respectively. There is contradictory evidence regarding the incidence of NUA in infants with IPT. The objective of this study is to determine if there is a clinical association between IPT and NUA. A case-control study was made in a Pediatric hospital in Santiago, Chile, with infants born between April 2000 and April 2005, considering as cases those with IPT, and controls those infants born following the cases, paired by sex and without IPT. All subjects had a complete physical examination and a renal ultrasound to assess for the presence of congenital anomalies and NUA, respectively. One hundred cases and an equal number of controls were included. There were 41 females in each group. In the case group, two infants presented renal anomalies in the RUS: one left hydronephrosis and one case of left kidney agenesis. In the control group, two infants with anomaly were found: one with a left ureterocele and one case of bilateral duplex kidney. The observed incidence of NUA was similar in both groups to that reported in the literature for the general population. No significant statistical difference was found in the incidence of these abnormalities between patients who presented with IPT and those who did not. From our study, we suggest that RUS is not necessary in the routine evaluation of infants with IPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IPT:

isolated preauricular tag

NUA:

nephrourological anomalies

RUS:

renal ultrasonography

DMSA:

technetium 99 m dimercaptosuccinic acid

References

  1. Wang R, Earl D, Ruder R, Graham J (2001) Syndromic ear anomalies and renal ultrasounds. Pediatrics 108(2):e32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kugelman A, Hadad B, Ben-David J, Podoshin L, Borochowitz Z, Bader D (1997) Preauricular tags and pits in the newborn: the role of hearing tests. Acta Paediatr 86(2):170–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinhart JM, Kuhn JP, Eisenberg B, Vaughan RL, Maggioli AJ, Cozza TF (1988) Ultrasound screening of healthy infants for urinary tract abnormalities. Pediatrics 82(4):609–614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kankkunen A, Thiringer K (1987) Hearing impairment in connection with preauricular tags. Acta Pediatr Scand 76(1):143–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohelet D, Arbel E (2000) A prospective research for urinary tract abnormalities in infants with isolated preauricular tags. Pediatrics 105(5):e61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra D, Archana, Gupta VK (2003) Are isolated preauricular tags a marker of urinary tract anomalies? Indian Pediatr 40(8):796–797

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bianca S, Ingegnosi C, Ettore G (2003) Pre-auricular tags and associated anomalies: considerations for genetic counseling. Genet Couns 14(3):321–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kugelman A, Tubi A, Bader D, Chemo M, Dabbah H (2002) Preauricular tags and pits in the newborn: the role of renal ultrasonography. J Pediatr 141(3):388–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hudgins I, Tuvale MK, Stephensen L (1992) Isolated anomalies of the external ear are not associated with renal malformations. Proc Greenwood Genet Ctr 11:95

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deshpande SA, Watson H (2006) Renal ultrasonography not required in babies with isolated minor ear anomalies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 91(1):F29–F30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Arora RS, Pryce R (2004) Is ultrasonography required to rule out renal malformations in babies with isolated preauricular tags? Arch Dis Child 89:492–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Castilla E, Orioli IM (2004) ECLAMC: the Latin-American collaborative study of congenital malformations. Community Genet 7:76–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ (eds) (2002) Volume 3, part IX. Pediatric urology. Campbell’s Urology, 8th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H, Leblond R (1986) Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications. Radiology 160(3):645–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23(6):478–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Centro de Investigaciones Médicas of the Pontificia Universidad Católica of Chile for aiding in the financing of this project, along with Paola Viviani for the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Macarena Lizama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lizama, M., Cavagnaro, F., Arau, R. et al. Association of isolated preauricular tags and nephrourological anomalies: case-control study. Pediatr Nephrol 22, 658–660 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-006-0395-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-006-0395-9

Keywords

Navigation