Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Oesophagectomy is one of the most challenging surgeries. Potential for morbidity and mortality is high. Minimally invasive techniques have been introduced in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications and recovery times. Debate continues over whether these techniques are beneficial to morbidity and whether oncological resection is compromised. This review article will analyse the different techniques employed in minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) and critically evaluate commonly reported outcome measures from the available literature.

Methods

Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and PubMed databases were used to search English language articles published on MIO. Thirty-one articles underwent thorough analysis and the data were tabulated where appropriate. To date, only level III evidence exists. Where appropriate, comparisons are made with a meta-analysis on open oesophagectomy.

Results

Positive aspects of MIO include at least comparable postoperative recovery data and oncological resection measures to open surgery. Intensive care unit requirements are lower, as is duration of inpatient stay. Respiratory morbidity varies. Negative aspects include increased technical skill of the surgeon and increased equipment requirements, increased operative time and limitation with respect to local advancement of cancer. With increasing individual experience, improvements in outcome measures and the amenability of this approach to increasing neoplastic advancement has been shown.

Conclusion

MIO has outcome measures at least as comparable to open oesophagectomy in the setting of benign and nonlocally advanced cancer. Transthoracic oesophagectomy provides superior exposure to the thoracic oesophagus compared to the transhiatal approach and is currently preferred. No multicentre randomised controlled trials exist or are likely to come into fruition. As with all surgery, careful patient selection is required for optimal results from MIO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 72:306–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin DJ, Bessell JR, Chew A, Watson DI (2005) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: initial experience and outcomes. Surg Endosc 19:1597–1601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas J (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 20:428–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki Y, Urashima M, Ishibashi Y, Abo M, Omura N, Nakada K, Kawasaki N, Eto K, Hanyu N, Yanaga K (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery (HALTS) in radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:1166–1174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Parthasarathi R, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan PR, Rajapandian S (2007) Laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy without thoracic or cervical access for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: an Indian experience from a tertiary center. Surg Endosc 21:16–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Böttger T, Terzic A, Müller M, Rodehorst A (2007) Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1695–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Godiris-Petit G, Munoz-Bongrand N, Honigman I, Cattan P, Sarfati E (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization. World J Surg 30:1434–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, Rucklidge MW (2008) Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 95:602–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson GS, Lloyd DM, Wicks AC, Veitch PS (1996) No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 83:675–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Swanstrom LL, Hansen P (1997) Laparoscopic total esophagectomy. Arch Surg 132:943–947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K, Hideshima T, Shiraishi T, Yoshinaga Y, Shirakusa T (1999) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 13:218–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson DI, Davies N, Jamieson GG (1999) Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 13:293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:902–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins G, Johnson E, Kroshus T, Ganz R, Batts K, Seng J, Nwaneri O, Dunn D (2006) Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 20:298–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutton CD, White SA, Marshall LJ, Berry DP, Veitch PS (2002) Endoscopic-assisted intrathoracic oesophagogastrostomy without thoracotomy for tumours of the lower oesophagus and cardia. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:46–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong SK, Chan AC, Lee DW, To EW, Ng EK, Chung SC (2003) Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. Surg Endosc 17:798–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Costi R, Himpens J, Bruyns J, Cadière GB (2004) Totally laparoscopic transhiatal esophago-gastrectomy without thoracic or cervical access. The least invasive surgery for adenocarcinoma of the cardia? Surg Endosc 18:629–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Espat NJ, Jacobsen G, Horgan S, Donahue P (2005) Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer: laparoscopic staging to robotic esophagectomy. Cancer J 11:10–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position–experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R (2005) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 190:69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bann S, Moorthy K, Shaul T, Foley R (2005) Laparoscopic transhiatal surgery of the esophagus. JSLS 9:376–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tinoco R, El-Kadre L, Tinoco A, Rios R, Sueth D, Pena F (2007) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: outcomes. Surg Endosc 21:1284–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanders G, Borie F, Husson E, Blanc PM, Di Mauro G, Claus C, Millat B (2007) Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy: lessons learned. Surg Endosc 21:1190–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920–925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bresadola V, Terrosu G, Cojutti A, Benzoni E, Baracchini E, Bresadola F (2006) Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Valladares H (2006) Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc 20:1681–1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadière GB (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 22:1060–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital’s first year experience. Dis Esophagus 21:220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EAB (1996) Trans-hiatal approach for esophagecotmy. In: Toouli J, Gossot D, Hunter JG (eds) Endosurgery. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 293–299

    Google Scholar 

  33. Misawa K, Hachisuka T, Kuno Y, Mori T, Shinohara M, Miyauchi M (2005) New procedure for purse-string suture in thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. Surg Endosc 19:40–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thairu N, Biswas S, Abdulaal Y, Ali H (2007) A new method for intrathoracic anastomosis in laparoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1887–1890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Allsop JR (1992) Ligature versus purse string for surgical stapled anastomoses. Aust N Z J Surg 62:740–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee KW, Leung KF, Wong KK, Lau KY, Lai KC, Leung SK, Leung LC, Lau KW (1997) One-stage thoracoscopic oesophagectomy: ligature intrathoracic stapled anastomosis. Aust N Z J Surg 67:131–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, Weigel TL, Raja S, Fernando HC, Keenan RJ, Nguyen NT (2000) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:906–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK (1985) The Will Rogers phenomenon: stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 312:1604–1608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Nick Butler, Stuart Collins, Breda Memon, and Muhammed Ashraf Memon have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Chelmsford Avenue, Ipswich, QLD, Australia

    Nick Butler, Stuart Collins, Breda Memon & Muhammed Ashraf Memon

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Muhammed Ashraf Memon

  3. Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Muhammed Ashraf Memon

  4. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bolton University, Bolton, Lancashire, UK

    Muhammed Ashraf Memon

Authors
  1. Nick Butler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stuart Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Breda Memon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammed Ashraf Memon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammed Ashraf Memon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, N., Collins, S., Memon, B. et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction. Surg Endosc 25, 2071–2083 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation