Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal resection improves patient outcome by reducing pain, postoperative pulmonary dysfunction, gastrointestinal paralysis, and fatigue. A multimodal rehabilitation program (“fast-track”) with epidural analgesia, early oral feeding, and enforced mobilization may further improve the excellent results of laparoscopic colorectal resection, enabling early ambulation of these patients.

Methods

Fifty two consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with standardized regular perioperative treatment (standard) or multimodal rehabilitation program (“fast-track”). Outcome measures included pulmonary function, duration of postoperative ileus, pain perception, fatigue, morbidity, and mortality.

Results

Twenty nine standard-care patients (19 men and 10 women) and 23 fast-track patients (15 men and eight women) were evaluated. Demographic and operative data were similar for the two groups. On the 1st postoperative day, pulmonary function was improved (p = 0.01) in fast-track patients. Oral feeding was achieved earlier (p < 0.01) and defecation occurred earlier (p < 0.01) in the fast-track group. Visual analogue scale scores for pain were similar for the two groups (p > 0.05), but fatigue was increased in the standard-care group on the 1st (p = 0.06) and 2nd (p < 0.05) postoperative days. Morbidity was not different for the two groups. Fast-track patients were discharged on day 4 (range, 3–6) and standard-care patients on day 7 (range, 4–14) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Multimodal rehabiliation can improve further on the excellent results of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and decrease the postoperative hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Thoracic Society (1987) ArticleTitleStandardization of spirometry—1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis 136 1285–1298

    Google Scholar 

  2. DG Altman (1991) Practical statistics for medical research; 1st edition Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  3. L Bardram P Funch-Jensen P Jensen ME Crawford H Kehlet (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation Lancet 345 763–764 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90643-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC1Mfks1I%3D Occurrence Handle7891489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. L Bardram P Funch Jensen H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleRapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection Br J Surg 87 1540–1545 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01559.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltFOhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11091243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. T Christensen T Bendix H Kehlet (1982) ArticleTitleFatigue and cardiorespiratory function following abdominal surgery Br J Surg 69 417–419 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2B2MfgsFU%3D Occurrence Handle7104617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. T Christensen H Kehlet (1993) ArticleTitlePostoperative fatigue World J Surg 17 220–225 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB1cbns1c%3D Occurrence Handle8511917

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection Br J Surg 87 379 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01369-14.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7otlCnsg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H Kehlet DW Wilmore (2000) ArticleTitleMultimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome Am J Surg 183 630–641 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas JM Piqué (1995) ArticleTitleShort-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer Surg Endosc 9 1101–1105 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00188458 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC3MfhtVY%3D Occurrence Handle8553212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F Marusch I Gastinger C Schneider H Scheidbach J Konradt HP Bru L Kohler E Barlehner F Kockerling (2001) ArticleTitleExperience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results Surg Endosc 15 116–120 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000340 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvit1Ghsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11285950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JW Milsom B Böhm (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. J Neudecker W Schwenk T Junghans S Pietsch B Bohm JM Muller (1999) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection Br J Surg 86 1292–1295 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01242.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgvF2lug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10540136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. W Schwenk B Böhm JM Müller (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoskopische oder konventionelle kolorektale Resektionen—beeinflusst die Operationstechnik die Lebensqualität Zentralbl Chir 123 483–490

    Google Scholar 

  14. W Schwenk B Böhm JM Müller (1998) ArticleTitlePostoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections: a prospective randomised trial Surg Endosc12 1131–1136

    Google Scholar 

  15. W Schwenk B Bohm C Witt T Junghans K Grundel JM Muller (1999) ArticleTitlePulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation Arch Surg 134 6–12 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.1.6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isVeisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9927122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. AJ Senagore HJ Duepree CP Delaney KM Brady VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleResults of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy Dis Colon Rectum 46 503–509 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6590-5 Occurrence Handle12682545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JG Stage S Schulze P Moller H Overgaard M Andersen VB Rebsdorf-Pedersen HJ Nielsen (1997) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma Br J Surg 84 391–396 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02516.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3s3htl0%3D Occurrence Handle9117320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. JC Weeks H Nelson S Gelber D Sargent G Schroeder (2002) ArticleTitleShort-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial JAMA 287 321–328 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.287.3.321 Occurrence Handle11790211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Schwenk.

Additional information

Note: Author W. Schwenk is a member of the German Advisory Board for Parecoxib/Valdecoxib of the Pfizer Company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raue, W., Haase, O., Junghans, T. et al. ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 18, 1463–1468 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9238-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9238-y

Keywords

Navigation