Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of delaying radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of surgical waiting time (SWT) on outcomes of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

Of the 1,732 patients who underwent surgery for RCC between 1989 and 2007, medical records of 319 with clinical stage II or higher RCC without distant metastases were retrospectively reviewed. Ten patients with SWT greater than 3 months were excluded from analysis, and we compared pathological upstaging and survival rates between patients with SWT <1 month (234/319, 73.3 %) and 1–3 months (75/319, 23.5 %).

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics between two groups were not different except the presence of symptom. The pathological upstaging was higher in patients with SWT of 1–3 months but statistically not significant. SWT of 1–3 months was not an independent predictor of pathological upstaging, recurrence-free survival (RFS; p = 0.896), or cancer-specific survival (CSS; p = 0.737). On subgroup analysis by TNM stage (cT2NxcM0 and cT3-4NxcM0), SWT of 1–3 months was not an independent predictor of pathological upstaging and was not associated with RFS or CSS. SWT, treated as a continuous variable, was also not an independent predictor of outcome in any subgroup. Similar results were found in symptomatic patients.

Conclusions

The outcomes of patients with prolonged SWT did not differ from those of most patients who underwent nephrectomy within 1 month. In patients with stage II or higher RCC who underwent nephrectomy within 3 months after diagnosis, prolonged SWT was not an independent predictor of pathological upstaging, RFS, or CSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blom JH, van Poppel H, Marechal JM, Jacqmin D, Schroder FH, de Prijck L, Sylvester R (2009) Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol 55(1):28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin BF, Delacroix SE, Culp SH, Gonzalez GM, Tannir NM, Jonasch E, Tamboli P, Wood CG (2011) Safety of presurgical targeted therapy in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 60(5):964–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman TN, Sharma S, Zhang S, Wong MK, Kim HL (2008) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal carcinoma. Urology 71(2):287–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowey CL, Amin C, Pruthi RS, Wallen EM, Nielsen ME, Grigson G, Watkins C, Nance KV, Crane J, Jalkut M, Moore DT, Kim WY, Godley PA, Whang YE, Fielding JR, Rathmell WK (2010) Neoadjuvant clinical trial with sorafenib for patients with stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 28(9):1502–1507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedland SJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Aronson WJ, Presti JC, Terris MK (2006) Delay of radical prostatectomy and risk of biochemical progression in men with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 175(4):1298–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6(7):655–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gore JL, Lai J, Setodji CM, Litwin MS, Saigal CS (2009) Mortality increases when radical cystectomy is delayed more than 12 weeks: results from a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis. Cancer 115(5):988–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellenthal NJ, Underwood W, Penetrante R, Litwin A, Zhang S, Wilding GE, Teh BT, Kim HL (2010) Prospective clinical trial of preoperative sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 184(3):859–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hock LM, Lynch J, Balaji KC (2002) Increasing incidence of all stages of kidney cancer in the last 2 decades in the United States: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data. J Urol 167(1):57–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom B, Holmberg E, Egevad L, Adolfsson J, Johansson JE, Hugosson J, Stattin P (2010) Outcome of primary versus deferred radical prostatectomy in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study. J Urol 184(4):1322–1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR (2008) Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 113(1):78–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z (2006) 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 49(5):798–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez CH, Martin P, Chalasani V, Williams AK, Luke PP, Izawa JI, Chin JL, Stitt L, Pautler SE (2011) How long can patients with renal cell carcinoma wait for surgery without compromising pathological outcomes? Can Urol Assoc J. doi:10.5489/cuaj.10035

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RJ, Abdolell M, Trottier G, Pringle C, Lawen JG, Bell DG, Jewett MA, Klotz L, Rendon RA (2011) Growth kinetics of renal masses: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance. Eur Urol 59(5):863–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ming X, Ningshu L, Hanzhong L, Zhongming H, Tonghua L (2009) Value of frozen section analysis of enlarged lymph nodes during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 74(2):364–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall M, Cathcart P, van der Meulen J, Gillatt D, McIntosh G, Emberton M (2005) A description of radical nephrectomy practice and outcomes in England: 1995–2002. BJU Int 96(1):58–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rais-Bahrami S, Guzzo TJ, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR, Allaf ME (2009) Incidentally discovered renal masses: oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with delayed surgical intervention. BJU Int 103(10):1355–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rathmell WK, Pruthi R, Wallen E (2010) Neoadjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 28(1):69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg T, Sørbye SW, Norum J, Wist EA (1996) Diagnostic delay causes more psychological distress in female than in male cancer patients. Anticancer Res 16(2):995–999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Huang WC, Mick R, Van Arsdalen KN, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB (2003) An interval longer than 12 weeks between the diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy is associated with worse outcome in bladder carcinoma. J Urol 169(1):110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB (2006) Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol 176(4 Pt 1):1317–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sciarra A, Cattarino S, Salciccia S, Alfarone A, Gentilucci A, Parente U, Mariotti G, Innocenzi M, Gentile V (2011) The emerging role of targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Is it time for a neoadjuvant or an adjuvant approach? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.02.003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simunovic M, Gagliardi A, McCready D, Coates A, Levine M, DePetrillo D (2001) A snapshot of waiting times for cancer surgery provided by surgeons affiliated with regional cancer centres in Ontario. CMAJ 165(4):421–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stec AA, Coons BJ, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Herrell SD, Smith JA, Clark PE (2008) Waiting time from initial urological consultation to nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma–does it affect survival? J Urol 179(6):2152–2157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subramonian KR, Puranik S, Mufti GR (2003) How will the two-weeks-wait rule affect delays in management of urological cancers? J R Soc Med 96(8):398–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas AA, Rini BI, Lane BR, Garcia J, Dreicer R, Klein EA, Novick AC, Campbell SC (2009) Response of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 181(2):518–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yaycioglu O, Rutman MP, Balasubramaniam M, Peters KM, Gonzalez JA (2002) Clinical and pathologic tumor size in renal cell carcinoma; difference, correlation, and analysis of the influencing factors. Urology 60(1):33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choung-Soo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.H., You, D., Jeong, I.G. et al. The impact of delaying radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138, 1561–1567 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1230-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1230-2

Keywords

Navigation