Abstract
Child sexual abuse is increasingly recognised in all societies, affecting boys and girls alike in all age groups and often involving oral, anal and vaginal penetration. The presence of physical evidence following suspected child sexual abuse is important in confirming the diagnosis and providing legal corroboration that abuse has occurred. Whilst many children have no physical evidence, its presence should be carefully sought and documented by skilled examination, regardless of the time interval between any suspected abuse and the examination. When examination is close to the time of the abuse, forensic sampling may be required. Although many children have no physical findings, understanding the significance of physical findings has increased with both experience and research, although certainty and agreement is lacking in some areas. There are few case control studies of abused and non-abused children where standard terminology, examination method and description allow for meaningful comparison. Conclusions: Physical findings rarely provide conclusive evidence of sexual abuse in isolation but may offer important pieces of the diagnostic “jigsaw picture”.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bond RG, Dowd D, Landsman I, Rimsza M (1995) Unintentional perineal injury in prepubescent girls: a multicenter, prospective report of 56 girls. Pediatrics 95:628–631
Dowd MD, Fitzmaurice L, Knapp JF, Mooney D (1994) The interpretation of urogenital findings in children with straddle injuries. J Pediatr Surg 29(1):7–10
Heppenstall-Heger A, McConnell G, Ticson L, Guerra L, Lister J, Zaragoza T (2003) Healing patterns in anogenital injuries: a longitudinal study of injuries associated with sexual abuse, accidental injuries, or genital surgery in the preadolescent child. Pediatrics 112(4):829–837
Hobbs CJ, Osman J (2007) Genital injuries in boys and abuse. Arch Dis Child 92:328–331
Hobbs CJ, Wynne JM (1999) Clinical aspects of child sexual abuse. In: Hobbs CJ, Hanks HGI, Wynne JM Child abuse and neglect: a clinicians’ handbook. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Kellogg N, The Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (2005) The evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics 116(2):506–512. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1336
McCann J, Miyamoto S, Boyle C, Rogers K (2007) Healing of hymenal injuries in prepubertal and adolescent girls: a descriptive study. Pediatrics 119(5):1094–1106
Myhre AK, Bemtzen K, Bratlid D (2001) Perianal anatomy in non-abused preschool children. Acta Paediatr 90(11):1321–1328
Pierce AM, Robson WJ (1993) Genital injury in girls—accidental injury or not? Pediatr Surg Int 8:239–243
Pokorny SF, Pokorny WJ, Kramer W (1992) Acute genital injury in the prepubertal girl. Amer J of Obstet Gynecol 166:1461–1466
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2008) Physical signs of child sexual abuse—an evidence-based review and guidance for best practice. Working Group of Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, London
Sugar NF, Feldman KW (2007) Perineal impalements in children: distinguishing accident from abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 23(9):605–616
Watkeys JM, Price LD, Upton PM, Maddocks A (2008) The timing of medical examination following an allegation of sexual abuse: is this an emergency? Arch Dis Child 93:851–856
West R, Davies A, Fenton T (1989) Accidental vulval injuries in childhood. BMJ 298:1002–1003
Whaitiri S, Kelly P (2011) Genital gonorrhoea in children: determining the source and mode of infection. Arch Dis Child Mar 96(3):247–251
Conflict of interest
The author has no financial relationship with the person who sponsored this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hobbs, C.J. Educational paper. Eur J Pediatr 171, 751–755 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1556-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1556-9