Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents: the attitude of the Flemish paediatrician anno 2010

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Confidentiality is a major issue in adolescent healthcare, and its perceived absence may be the main barrier for an adolescent to seek medical care. Little is known about the right on informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents in Belgium, although these rights are unambiguously foreseen in the law on patients' rights since 2002. There are no data available regarding the introduction of a private moment with the physician during a consultation, about the nature and the quantity of information made available to parents by the paediatricians regarding the health situation of adolescents and about the existence of procedures with regard to these matters. The purpose of this study is to map out the current interpretation and the attitude of the paediatrician with regard to the right to confidentiality and informative privacy. The answers of 117 Flemish paediatricians to an anonymous questionnaire were analyzed. An unaccompanied medical visit is not frequent in Belgium (only 1%). Only 35.1% of the paediatricians systematically offer the possibility to have a private conversation with an adolescent. Almost 80% of the paediatricians render, as a rule, all information to the parents. Parents are informed about sensible information regarding psychosocial aspects, including data concerning sexual behaviour, in not less than 83.2% of the consultations by adolescents. Only in 2.9% no information is given to the parents. The paediatricians employ only for 13% the procedures regarding confidentiality for minors. This study reveals that Flemish paediatricians have a paternalistic attitude concerning the right on confidentiality and informative privacy, which is not in line with the Belgian legislation. Paediatricians offer only seldom the possibility for a private conversation to the adolescent. The small incidence of unaccompanied medical consultations contributes to this. Proper application of the legal context, the handling of the watertight procedures and the necessary communication in this respect is indispensable for the confidence and will lower the barrier for adolescents to use the healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams KE (2004) Mandatory parental notification: the importance of confidential health care for adolescents. J Am Med Womens Assoc 59:87–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akinbami LJ, Sandhi H, Cheng TL (2003) Availability of adolescent health services and confidentiality in primary care practices. Pediatrics 111:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bender SS (1999) Attitude of Icelandic young people toward sexual en reproductive health. Fam Plann Perspect 21:294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berlan ED, Bravender T (2009) Confidentiality, consent, and caring for the adolescent patient. Curr Opin Pediatr 21:450–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Committee on Adolescence American Academy of Paediatrics (2008) Achieving quality health services for adolescents. Pediatrics 121:1263–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deneyer M, Clybouw C, De Groot E et al. (2010) The surgeon and the Law on Patient's rights to minors. Acta Chir Belg, in press.

  7. Deneyer M, De Groot E, Devroey D et al. (2010) Wet op de patiëntenrechten: in de praktijk niet evident voor minderjarigen. Tijdschr. voor Geneeskunde 66;16:764–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dillman DA (1991) The design and administration of mail surveys. Annu Rev Sociol 17:225–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Donovan C, Mellanby AR, Jacobson LD et al (1997) Teenagers' views on the general practice consultation and provision contraception. The adolescent working group. Br J Gen Pract 47:715–718

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan RE, Drew SE, Hodgson J et al (2009) Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people. Soc Sci Med 69:1691–1699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. English A, Ford CA (2004) The HIPAA privacy rule and adolescents: legal questions and clinical challenges. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 36:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrant B, Watson PD (2004) Health care delivery: perspectives of young people with chronic illness and their parents. J Paediatr Child Health 40:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher M, Golden NH, Bergeson R et al (1996) Update on adolescent health care in paediatric practice. J Adolesc Health 19:394–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ford CA, Millstein SG, Halpern-Felsher BL et al (1997) Influence of physican confidentiality assurances on adolescents' willingness to disclose information and seek future health care. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 278:1029–1034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garside R, Ayres R, Owen MR et al (2000) General practitioners' attitudes to sexual activity in under-sixteens. J Roy Soc Med 93:563–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchinson JW, Stafford EM (2005) Changing parental opions about teen privacy through education. Pediatrics 116:966–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klostermann BK, Slap GB, Nebrig DM et al (2005) Earning trust and losing it: adolescents' views on rusting physicians. J Fam Pract 54:679–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malik R, Oandasan I, Yang M (2002) Health promotion, the family physician and youth: improving the connection. Fam Pract 19:523–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oppong-Odiseng AC, Heycock EG (1997) Adolescent health services through their eyes. Arch Dis Child 77:115–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perez MD, Pereniguez JE, Osuna E et al (2006) Primary care confidentiality for Spanish adolescents: fact or fiction? J Med Ethics 32:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reddy DM, Fleming R, Swain C (2002) Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA 288:710–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutishauser C, Esslinger A, Bond L et al (2003) Consultations with adolescents: the gap between their expectations and their experiences. Acta Paediatr 92:1322–1326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanci LA, Coffey CM, Veit FC et al (2000) Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners in adolescent health care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 320:224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spear S, English A (2007) Protecting confidentiality to safeguard adolescents' health: finding common ground. Contraception 76:73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultiëns L, Goffin T, Borry P et al (2007) Minors and informed consent: a comparative approach. Eur J Health Law 14:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Urkin J, Bilenko N, Barak N et al (2008) Parental attitude toward unaccompanied clinic visits of adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health 20:375–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Urkin J, Bilenko N, Bar-David Y et al (2008) Who accompanies a child to the office of a physician? Int J Adolesc Med Health 20:513–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. www.unicef.org/crc

Download references

Conflicts of interest

No funding was provided for this study. None of the authors declare any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitair Kinderziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Michel Deneyer, Etienne De Groot, Ciska Clybouw & Yvan Vandenplas

  2. Department of General Practice, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Dirk Devroey

  3. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Ronald Buyl

Authors
  1. Michel Deneyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Devroey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Etienne De Groot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ronald Buyl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ciska Clybouw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yvan Vandenplas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Deneyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deneyer, M., Devroey, D., De Groot, E. et al. Informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents: the attitude of the Flemish paediatrician anno 2010. Eur J Pediatr 170, 1159–1163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1427-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1427-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation