Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Informed consent means approval of the legal representative of the child and/or of the competent child for medical interventions following appropriate information. National legal regulations differ in regard to the question when a child has the full right to give his or her autonomous consent. Informed assent means a child's agreement to medical procedures in circumstances where he or she is not legally authorised or lacks sufficient understanding for giving consent competently. Doctors should carefully listen to the opinion and wishes of children who are not able to give full consent and should strive to obtain their assent. Doctors have the responsibility to determine the ability and competence of the child for giving his or her consent or assent. All children, even those not judged as competent, have a right to receive information given in a way that they can understand and give their assent or dissent. This consent/assent process must promote and protect the dignity, privacy and confidentiality of the child and his or her family. Consent or assent is required for all aspects of medical care, for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic measures and research. Children may effectively refuse treatment or procedures which are not necessary to save their lives or prevent serious harm. Where treatment is necessary to save a life or prevent serious harm, the doctor has the duty to act in the best interest of the child. However, parents may also refuse to consent and in this case national laws and legal mechanisms for resolving disputes may be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Further reading

  1. Alderson P (1990) Choosing for children: parents' consent to surgery. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alderson P, Montgomery J (1996) Healthcare choices. Making decisions with children. Institute of Public Policy Research, London

  3. Devereux JA, Jones DH, Dickenson DI (1993) Can children withhold consent to treatment? BMJ 303:1459–1461

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doyal L (1993) Needs, rights and the moral duties of clinicians. In: Gillon R (ed) Principles of health care ethics. Wiley, London, pp 217–230

  5. Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) (2003). Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants. Eur J Pediatr 162:455–458

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foreman DM (1999) The family rule. A framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children. J Med Ethics 25:491–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillon R (1991) Philosophical medical ethics. Wiley, Chichester

  8. King NMP, Cross AW (1996) Children as decision makers. Guidelines for paediatricians. J Pediatr 115:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurz R, Ethics Working Group of the CESP (2001) Decision making in extreme situations involving children: withholding of withdrawal of life supporting treatment in paediatric care. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of the European Specialists of Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 160: 214–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lansdown R (1998) Listening to children; have we gone too far ( or not far enough )? J Roy Soc Med 91: 457–461

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1995) Human tissue and legal issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London

  12. Ondrusek N, Abramowitch R, Pencharz P, Koren G (1998) Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research. J Med Ethics 24: 158–165

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearce J (1994) Consent to treatment during childhood: the assessment of competence and the avoidance of conflict. Br J Psychiatry 165: 1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauer PPJ, Ethics Working Group of the CESP (2002) Research in children. Report on behalf of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics. Eur J Paediatr 161: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations Children's Fund (1995) The Convention of the Rights of the Child. UK Committee for UNICEF, London

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Kurz.

Additional information

Members of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP are: Timothy L. Chambers (UK), Francis P. Crawley (Belgium), Denis Gill (Ireland), Milena LoGiudice (Italy), Stefan Grosek (Slovenia), Ronald Kurz, Chairman (Austria), Maria de Lourdes Levy (Portugal), Staffan Mjönes (Sweden), Andreas Constantopoulos (Greece), Armido Rubino (Italy), Pieter J. J. Sauer (Netherlands), Martti Siimes (Finland), Michael Weindling (UK) and Maximilian Zach (Austria).

Approved by the CESP, May 4th, 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Lourdes Levy, M., Larcher, V., Kurz, R. et al. Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162, 629–633 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1193-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1193-z

Keywords

Navigation