Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2020

26-02-2019 | Original Article

Age-related changes in Bayesian belief updating during attentional deployment and motor intention

Auteurs: Paola Mengotti, Anna B. Kuhns, Gereon R. Fink, Simone Vossel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Predicting upcoming events using past observations is a crucial component of an efficient allocation of attentional resources. Therefore, the deployment of attention is sensitive to different types of cues predicting upcoming events. Here we investigated probabilistic inference abilities in spatial and feature-based attentional, as well as in motor-intentional subsystems, focusing specifically on the age-related changes in these abilities. In two behavioral experiments, younger and older adults (20 younger and 20 older adults for each experiment) performed three versions of a cueing paradigm, where spatial, feature, or motor cues predicted the location, color, or motor response of a target stimulus. The percentage of cue validity (i.e., the probability of the cue being valid) changed over time, thereby creating a volatile environment. A Bayesian hierarchical model was used to estimate trial-wise beliefs concerning the cue validity from reaction times and to derive a subject-specific belief updating parameter ω in each task version. We also manipulated task difficulty: participants performed an easier version of the task in Experiment 1 and a more difficult version in Experiment 2. Results from Experiment 1 suggested a preserved ability of older adults to use the three different cues to generate predictions. However, the increased task demands of Experiment 2 uncovered a difference in belief updating between the two age groups, indicating moderate evidence for a reduction of the ability to update predictions with motor intention cues in older adults. These results point at a distinction of attentional and motor-intentional subsystems, with age-related differences tackling especially the motor-intentional subsystem.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Curran, T., Hills, A., Patterson, M. B., & Strauss, M. E. (2001). Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 39(3), 288–301.CrossRef Curran, T., Hills, A., Patterson, M. B., & Strauss, M. E. (2001). Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 39(3), 288–301.CrossRef
go back to reference Eppinger, B., Haemmerer, D., & Li, S. C. (2011). Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 1–17.CrossRef Eppinger, B., Haemmerer, D., & Li, S. C. (2011). Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Eppinger, B., Heekeren, H. R., & Li, S. C. (2015). Age-related prefrontal impairments implicate deficient prediction of future reward in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 36(8), 2380–2390.CrossRef Eppinger, B., Heekeren, H. R., & Li, S. C. (2015). Age-related prefrontal impairments implicate deficient prediction of future reward in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 36(8), 2380–2390.CrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Friston, K., Mattout, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Ashburner, J., & Penny, W. (2007). Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. Neuroimage, 34, 220–234.CrossRef Friston, K., Mattout, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Ashburner, J., & Penny, W. (2007). Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. Neuroimage, 34, 220–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(2), 87–97.CrossRef Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(2), 87–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Iglesias, S., Mathys, C., Brodersen, K. H., Kasper, L., Piccirelli, M., den Ouden, H. E. M., & Stephan, K. E. (2013). Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and basal forebrain during sensory learning. Neuron, 80(2), 519–530.CrossRef Iglesias, S., Mathys, C., Brodersen, K. H., Kasper, L., Piccirelli, M., den Ouden, H. E. M., & Stephan, K. E. (2013). Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and basal forebrain during sensory learning. Neuron, 80(2), 519–530.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang, J., Beck, J., Heller, K., & Egner, T. (2015). An insula-frontostriatal network mediates flexible cognitive control by adaptively predicting changing control demands. Nature Communications, 6, 8165.CrossRef Jiang, J., Beck, J., Heller, K., & Egner, T. (2015). An insula-frontostriatal network mediates flexible cognitive control by adaptively predicting changing control demands. Nature Communications, 6, 8165.CrossRef
go back to reference Mann, S. L., Hazlett, E. A., Byne, W., Hof, P. R., Buchsbaum, M. S., Cohen, B. H., … Chu, K. W. (2011). Anterior and posterior cingulate cortex volume in healthy adults: effects of aging and gender differences. Brain Research, 1401, 18–29.CrossRef Mann, S. L., Hazlett, E. A., Byne, W., Hof, P. R., Buchsbaum, M. S., Cohen, B. H., … Chu, K. W. (2011). Anterior and posterior cingulate cortex volume in healthy adults: effects of aging and gender differences. Brain Research, 1401, 18–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathys, C., Daunizeau, J., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2011). A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 39.CrossRef Mathys, C., Daunizeau, J., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2011). A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 39.CrossRef
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The Assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.CrossRef Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The Assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Pardo, J. V., Lee, J. T., Sheikh, S. A., Surerus-Johnson, C., Shah, H., Munch, K. R., & Dysken, M. W. (2007). Where the brain grows old: decline in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal function with normal aging. Neuroimage, 35(3), 1231–1237.CrossRef Pardo, J. V., Lee, J. T., Sheikh, S. A., Surerus-Johnson, C., Shah, H., Munch, K. R., & Dysken, M. W. (2007). Where the brain grows old: decline in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal function with normal aging. Neuroimage, 35(3), 1231–1237.CrossRef
go back to reference Rushworth, M. F., Ellison, A., & Walsh, V. (2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 656.CrossRef Rushworth, M. F., Ellison, A., & Walsh, V. (2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 656.CrossRef
go back to reference Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Daunizeau, J., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2009). Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage, 46, 1004–1017.CrossRef Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Daunizeau, J., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2009). Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage, 46, 1004–1017.CrossRef
go back to reference Tales, A., Muir, J. L., Bayer, A., & Snowden, R. J. (2002). Spatial shifts in visual attention in normal ageing and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2000–2012.CrossRef Tales, A., Muir, J. L., Bayer, A., & Snowden, R. J. (2002). Spatial shifts in visual attention in normal ageing and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2000–2012.CrossRef
go back to reference Tellinghuisen, D. J., Zimba, L. D., & Robin, D. A. (1996). Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(6), 947–958.CrossRef Tellinghuisen, D. J., Zimba, L. D., & Robin, D. A. (1996). Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(6), 947–958.CrossRef
go back to reference Twedell, E. L., Koutstaal, W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2017). Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(4), 1135–1141.CrossRef Twedell, E. L., Koutstaal, W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2017). Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(4), 1135–1141.CrossRef
go back to reference Vossel, S., Mathys, C., Daunizeau, J., Bauer, M., Driver, J., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2014). Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: A study of saccadic response speed. Cerebral Cortex, 24(6), 1436–1450.CrossRef Vossel, S., Mathys, C., Daunizeau, J., Bauer, M., Driver, J., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2014). Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: A study of saccadic response speed. Cerebral Cortex, 24(6), 1436–1450.CrossRef
go back to reference Vossel, S., Mathys, C., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2015). Cortical coupling reflects Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(33), 11532–11542.CrossRef Vossel, S., Mathys, C., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2015). Cortical coupling reflects Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(33), 11532–11542.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology, part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1):58–76.CrossRef Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology, part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1):58–76.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Age-related changes in Bayesian belief updating during attentional deployment and motor intention
Auteurs
Paola Mengotti
Anna B. Kuhns
Gereon R. Fink
Simone Vossel
Publicatiedatum
26-02-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01154-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2020

Psychological Research 5/2020 Naar de uitgave