Top

Gepubliceerd in:

08-03-2018 | Original Article

Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?

Auteurs: Pauline M. Hilt, Pasquale Cardellicchio

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2020

Abstract

Motor inhibition and attentional processing are tightly linked. Recent neurophysiological studies have shown that both processes might rely on similar cognitive and neural mechanisms (Wessel and Aron, Neuron 93:259–280, 2017). However, it remains unclear whether attentional reorientation influences inhibition of a subsequent action. Therefore, we combined two tasks that are commonly used in the motor inhibition and visual attention reorientation field [respectively: the stop-signal task (Logan and Cowan, Psychol Rev 91:295–327, 1984) and the Posner endogenous cueing paradigm (Posner, Q J Exp Psychol 32(1):3–25, 1980)] to investigate how different aspects of visual attention modulate subsequent voluntary inhibition. Our results showed an increase in stopping-reaction time after a reorientation of attention only. This suggests a specific impairment of inhibitory control when a reorientation of visual attention is needed. These findings support the idea of a selective influence of attention reorientation on subsequent motor inhibition (stop signal). This may be linked to the “circuit breaker” hypothesis, proposing that attention reorientation toward an unexpected event “resets” the ongoing processes to allow the analysis of the potentially behaviorally relevant visual events (Corbetta et al., Neuron 58(3):306–324, 2008).

vorige artikel Do arousal and valence have separable influences on attention across time?

volgende artikel The effects of attentional focus in the preparation and execution of a standing long jump

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Aron, A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry, 69(12), e55–e68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024.CrossRefPubMed

Aron, A. R., Durston, S., Eagle, D. M., Logan, G. D., Stinear, C. M., & Stuphorn, V. (2007). Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 11860–11864. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-07.2007.CrossRefPubMed

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010.CrossRefPubMed

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003.CrossRef

Arrington, C. M., Carr, T. H., Mayer, A. R., & Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object-based selection of a region in space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 Suppl, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900563975.CrossRef

Band, G. P. H., van der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica, 112(2), 105–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3.CrossRefPubMed

Barcelo, F., Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Periáñez, J. A. (2006). Task Switching and Novelty Processing Activate a Common Neural Network for Cognitive Control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1734–1748. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1734.CrossRefPubMed

Barceló, F., Periáñez, J., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Think differently: A brain orienting response to task novelty. Neuroreport, 13(15), 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200210280-00011.CrossRefPubMed

Bartoli, E., Aron, A. R., & Tandon, N. (2018). Topography and timing of activity in right inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula for stopping movement. Human Brain Mapping, 39(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23835.CrossRefPubMed

Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1664.CrossRefPubMed

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357.CrossRefPubMed

Burnham, B. R. (2007). Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 392–422.CrossRef

Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Gould, I. C., English, T., Garavan, H., McNaught, E., et al. (2007). Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(6), 3638–3647. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00685.2007.CrossRefPubMed

Chambers, C. D., Garavan, H., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2009). Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016.CrossRefPubMed

Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Hirose, S., Yamashita, K., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2009). Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15870–15877. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3645-09.2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/73009.CrossRefPubMed

Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755.CrossRef

Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39(2), 131–143.CrossRef

Donchin, E. (1981). Presidential address. 1980. Surprise!… Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18(5), 493–513.CrossRef

Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., Chambers, C. D., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 27–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562997.CrossRefPubMed

Gentsch, A., Ullsperger, P., & Ullsperger, M. (2009). Dissociable medial frontal negativities from a common monitoring system for self- and externally caused failure of goal achievement. NeuroImage, 47(4), 2023–2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.064.CrossRefPubMed

Hampshire, A., Chamberlain, S. R., Monti, M. M., Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2010). The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: Inhibition and attentional control. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1313–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 247–273).

Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/72999.CrossRefPubMed

Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., & Logan, G. D. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9(4), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.491.CrossRefPubMed

Laming, D. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-X.CrossRef

Lasaponara, S., Chica, A. B., Lecce, F., Lupianez, J., & Doricchi, F. (2011). ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: Challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2648–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.012.CrossRefPubMed

Leiva, A., Parmentier, F. B. R., Elchlepp, H., & Verbruggen, F. (2015). Reorienting the mind: The impact of novel sounds on go/no-go performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(5), 1197–1202.PubMed

Levy, B. J., & Wagner, A. D. (2011). Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: Reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x.Cognitive.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.CrossRef

Logan, G. D., Van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control. Psychological Review, 121(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035230.CrossRefPubMed

Nachev, P., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. (2008). Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2478.CrossRefPubMed

Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., & Mesulam, M. M. (1999). Orbitofrontal cortex is activated during breaches of expectation in tasks of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/4513.CrossRefPubMed

Parmentier, F. B. R. (2014). The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: A review. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4.CrossRefPubMed

Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016). Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds’ informational value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000195.CrossRefPubMed

Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

Parmentier, F. B. R., Maybery, M. T., & Elsley, J. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(2), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.2.279.CrossRef

Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231.CrossRefPubMed

Rabbitt, P. M. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022853.CrossRefPubMed

Richard Ridderinkhof, K., Band, G. P. H., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptive behavior: Effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one’s actions. Acta Psychologica, 101(2–3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00010-4.CrossRef

Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (2002). Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 40(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00068-9.CrossRefPubMed

Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2001). Response execution and inhibition in children with AD/HD and other disruptive disorders: The role of behavioural activation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00728.CrossRefPubMed

Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.527.CrossRefPubMed

Shulman, G. L., Astafiev, S. V., Franke, D., Pope, D. L. W., Abraham, Z., Mcavoy, M. P., & Corbetta, M. (2009). Interaction of stimulus-driven reorienting and expectation in ventral and dorsal fronto-parietal and basal ganglia-cortical networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(14), 4392–4407. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5609-08.2009.Interaction.CrossRefPubMed

Sylwan, R. P. (2004). The control of deliberate waiting strategies in a stop-signal task. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 37(6), 853–862. doi:/S0100-879X2004000600011.CrossRef

Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006.CrossRefPubMed

van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science, 24(3), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Szmalec, A., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter? Experimental Psychology, 52(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.125.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004). The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 116(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500151386.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. A. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.479.CrossRefPubMed

Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I. P. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behavior change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614526414.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Verbruggen, F., Stevens, T., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: An attentional account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R. (2013). Dorsal and ventral attention systems: Distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. The Neuroscientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858413494269. July .CrossRefPubMed

Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2013). Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(47), 18481–18491. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3456-13.2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2017). On the globality of motor suppression: Unexpected events and their influence on behavior and cognition. Neuron, 93, 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wessel, J. R., Jenkinson, N., Brittain, J. S., Voets, S. H. E. M., Aziz, T. Z., & Aron, A. R. (2016). Surprise disrupts cognition via a fronto-basal ganglia suppressive mechanism. Nature Communications. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11195.

Wessel, J. R., Reynoso, H. S., & Aron, A. R. (2013). Saccade suppression exerts global effects on the motor system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110(4), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00229.2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wessel, J. R., Tonnesen, A. L., & Aron, A. R. (2015). Stimulus devaluation induced by action stopping is greater for explicit value representations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01640.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?
Auteurs: Pauline M. Hilt
Pasquale Cardellicchio
Publicatiedatum: 08-03-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0998-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2020

Quantifying insightful problem solving: a modified compound remote associates paradigm using lexical priming to parametrically modulate different sources of task difficulty

Task instructions modulate unit–decade binding in two-digit number representation

Action plan interrupted: resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation

Beholders’ sensorimotor engagement enhances aesthetic rating of pictorial facial expressions of pain

Tapping ahead of time: its association with timing variability

Event segmentation and the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory