Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2018

22-09-2017 | Original Article

The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: the influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate

Auteurs: Kerstin Fröber, Lisa Raith, Gesine Dreisbach

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Current theories describe cognitive control as a dynamic balance between two antagonistic control functions, namely cognitive stability and flexibility. Recent evidence suggests that this balance between these control modes is modulated by changing reward prospects on the one side and contextual parameters on the other. In the present study, we aim to investigate how both factors interact. In a between-subjects design, we manipulated the context by the ratio of free- to forced-choice trials (80:20, 50:50, 20:80) in a hybrid task-switching paradigm, combining forced- and free-choice task switching. In addition, two reward magnitudes changed randomly from trial to trial. Results showed an overall increase in voluntary switch rate (VSR) with increasing forced-choice frequency, demonstrating a robust context effect. Moreover, the trial-by-trial reward manipulation interacted with this global context effect: with a stability bias (80% free:20% forced), only an increase in reward expectation increased VSR, whereas with a more flexible global bias (in the 50:50 or 20:80 conditions) VSR increased when reward expectation changed and reduced when reward expectation remained high. Taken together, results suggest that the cognitive system is able to adapt to global context parameters and to respond to rapid changes in reward expectation at the same time.
Voetnoten
1
In Fröber and Dreisbach (2016a), VSR was significantly lowest when the reward prospect remained high and did not differ significantly between reward remainlow, reward increase and reward decrease trials. But numerically, VSR was highest in the two conditions with a reward change (increase and decrease) and intermediate when the reward remained low.
 
2
The data of the free:forced 80:20 and 50:50 group were collected by one of our student research assistants, while the data of the 20:80 group were collected as part of a student’s master thesis project. As a general rule to keep the effort between projects comparable, data collection from 60 participants was required. Therefore, the initial sample size was higher in this than in the other groups.
 
3
Such a restriction to only two reward sequences with a free:forced ratio of 20:80 was also done in Fröber and Dreisbach (2016a). There, free-choice trials were either increase and remain high (exp. 1–3) or decrease and remain low trials (exp. 4). The current manipulation with restriction to remain low and remain high has the advantage of a balanced distribution of low and high reward trials across the whole experiment, as is also the case in the other two groups. For a discussion of the consequences of a disproportion between low and high reward trials, see Fröber and Dreisbach (2016a, supplementary materials).
 
4
Many participants had single design cells with trial numbers ≤ 5, but we decided to keep as many participants as possible in the sample and to only exclude participants with single cells without data points.
 
5
Box plots were created with SPSS based on mean RTs and error rates across all conditions in the extended practice block without reward manipulation. Data points are marked as extreme values when their distance exceeds more than three times the inter-quartile range from the lower or upper end of the inter-quartile range.
 
6
Experiment 5 in Fröber and Dreisbach (2016a), where the same VSR pattern was found, used a typical voluntary task-switching procedure with 100% free-choice trials with restricted free-choice by the global instruction to perform each task about equally often and in random order.
 
7
Interestingly, Shen and Chun (2011), who first investigated the effect of sequentially changing reward prospect on cognitive flexibility, found that specifically an increase in reward prospect enhanced flexibility as indicated by reduced switch costs in forced task switching. That is, they found a data pattern similar to the present VSR results in the high stability group (free:forced 80:20). An important methodological difference between Shen and Chun and our task-switching studies so far is that the former authors used bivalent tasks and responses, while we used univalent tasks and responses. Bivalent tasks are associated with increased shielding demands, which might result in a generally more stable cognitive mode, where again only the motivational effect of a reward increase is sufficient to promote cognitive flexibility.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Armbruster, D. J. N., Ueltzhöffer, K., Basten, U., & Fiebach, C. J. (2012). Prefrontal cortical mechanisms underlying individual differences in cognitive flexibility and stability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(12), 2385–2399. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00286.CrossRefPubMed Armbruster, D. J. N., Ueltzhöffer, K., Basten, U., & Fiebach, C. J. (2012). Prefrontal cortical mechanisms underlying individual differences in cognitive flexibility and stability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(12), 2385–2399. doi:10.​1162/​jocn_​a_​00286.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–615.CrossRefPubMed Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–615.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Arrington, C. M., Reiman, K. M., & Weaver, S. M. (2014). Voluntary task switching. In J. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 117–136). Oxford: University Press.CrossRef Arrington, C. M., Reiman, K. M., & Weaver, S. M. (2014). Voluntary task switching. In J. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 117–136). Oxford: University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005b). Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 99–110. doi:10.1002/cne.20723.CrossRefPubMed Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005b). Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 99–110. doi:10.​1002/​cne.​20723.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working momory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 713–738). Cambridge: MIT Press. Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working momory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 713–738). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Cohen, J. D., Aston-Jones, G., & Gilzenrat, M. S. (2004). A systems-level perspective on attention and cognitive control: Guided activation, adaptive gating, conflict monitoring, and exploitation versus exploration. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 71–90). New York: Guilford Press. Cohen, J. D., Aston-Jones, G., & Gilzenrat, M. S. (2004). A systems-level perspective on attention and cognitive control: Guided activation, adaptive gating, conflict monitoring, and exploitation versus exploration. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 71–90). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343–353. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.343.CrossRefPubMed Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343–353. doi:10.​1037/​0278-7393.​30.​2.​343.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1540–1546. doi:10.1037/a0024077.CrossRefPubMed Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1540–1546. doi:10.​1037/​a0024077.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). The differential influences of positive affect, random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 530–547. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0259-x.CrossRefPubMed Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). The differential influences of positive affect, random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 530–547. doi:10.​3758/​s13415-014-0259-x.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2016a). How sequential changes in reward magnitude modulate cognitive flexibility: Evidence from voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 285–295. doi:10.1037/xlm0000166.CrossRefPubMed Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2016a). How sequential changes in reward magnitude modulate cognitive flexibility: Evidence from voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 285–295. doi:10.​1037/​xlm0000166.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Goschke, T. (2003). Voluntary action and cognitive control from a neuroscience perspective. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Eds.), Voluntary action. Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 49–85). Oxford: University Press. Goschke, T. (2003). Voluntary action and cognitive control from a neuroscience perspective. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Eds.), Voluntary action. Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 49–85). Oxford: University Press.
go back to reference Goschke, T. (2013). Volition in action: Intentions control dilemmas and the dynamic regulation of intentional control. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 409–434). Cambridge: MIT Press. Goschke, T. (2013). Volition in action: Intentions control dilemmas and the dynamic regulation of intentional control. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 409–434). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Goschke, T. (2014). Dysfunctions of decision-making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: Advances, gaps, and needs in current research. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(Suppl 1), 41–57. doi:10.1002/mpr.1410.CrossRefPubMed Goschke, T. (2014). Dysfunctions of decision-making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: Advances, gaps, and needs in current research. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(Suppl 1), 41–57. doi:10.​1002/​mpr.​1410.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grange, J., & Houghton, G. (Eds.). (2014). Task switching and cognitive control. Oxford: University Press. Grange, J., & Houghton, G. (Eds.). (2014). Task switching and cognitive control. Oxford: University Press.
go back to reference Hefer, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2016). The motivational modulation of proactive control in a modified version of the AX-continuous performance task: Evidence from cue-based and prime-based preparation. Motivation Science, 2(2), 116–134. doi:10.1037/mot0000034.CrossRef Hefer, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2016). The motivational modulation of proactive control in a modified version of the AX-continuous performance task: Evidence from cue-based and prime-based preparation. Motivation Science, 2(2), 116–134. doi:10.​1037/​mot0000034.CrossRef
go back to reference Hefer, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). How performance-contingent reward prospect modulates cognitive control: Increased cue maintenance at the cost of decreased flexibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi:10.1037/xlm0000397.PubMed Hefer, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). How performance-contingent reward prospect modulates cognitive control: Increased cue maintenance at the cost of decreased flexibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi:10.​1037/​xlm0000397.PubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2015). Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 2, pp. 33–67). Waltham: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.003. Hommel, B. (2015). Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 2, pp. 33–67). Waltham: Elsevier. doi:10.​1016/​bs.​adms.​2015.​04.​003.
go back to reference Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. doi:10.1037/a0019842.CrossRefPubMed Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. doi:10.​1037/​a0019842.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Müller, J., Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., Hensch, T., Lesch, K.-P., & Brocke, B. (2007). Dopamine and cognitive control: The prospect of monetary gains influences the balance between flexibility and stability in a set-shifting paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26(12), 3661–3668. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05949.x.CrossRefPubMed Müller, J., Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., Hensch, T., Lesch, K.-P., & Brocke, B. (2007). Dopamine and cognitive control: The prospect of monetary gains influences the balance between flexibility and stability in a set-shifting paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26(12), 3661–3668. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1460-9568.​2007.​05949.​x.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. doi:10.1037/a0019791.CrossRefPubMed Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. doi:10.​1037/​a0019791.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: the influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate
Auteurs
Kerstin Fröber
Lisa Raith
Gesine Dreisbach
Publicatiedatum
22-09-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0922-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2018

Psychological Research 1/2018 Naar de uitgave