Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2018

11-03-2017 | Original Article

Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision

Auteurs: Pietro Spataro, Daniele Saraulli, Neil W. Mulligan, Vincenzo Cestari, Marco Costanzi, Clelia Rossi-Arnaud

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The distinction between identification and production processes suggests that implicit memory should require more attention resources when there is a competition between alternative solutions during the test phase. The present two experiments assessed this hypothesis by examining the effects of divided attention (DA) at encoding on the high- and low-response-competition versions of perceptual identification (Experiment 1) and lexical decision (Experiment 2). In both experiments, words presented in the high-response-competition condition had many orthographic neighbours and at least one higher-frequency neighbour, whereas words presented in the low-response-competition condition had few orthographic neighbours and no higher-frequency neighbour. Consistent with the predictions of the identification/production distinction, Experiment 1 showed that DA reduced repetition priming in the high-, but not in the low-response-competition version of perceptual identification; in contrast, DA had comparable effects in the two versions of lexical decision (Experiments 2). These findings provide the first experimental evidence in support of the hypothesis that perceptual identification, a task nominally based on identification processes, might involve a substantive production component.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802–814. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802–814.
go back to reference Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254.
go back to reference Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity onlexical retrieval: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439–461.CrossRef Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity onlexical retrieval: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2004). Neighbourhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 75–95.PubMedCrossRef Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2004). Neighbourhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 75–95.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ballesteros, S., & Mayas, J. (2015). Selective attention affects conceptual object priming and recognition: Astudy with young and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1567.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ballesteros, S., & Mayas, J. (2015). Selective attention affects conceptual object priming and recognition: Astudy with young and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1567.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Barnhardt, T. M. (2005). Number of solutions effects in stem decision: Support for the distinction between identification and production processes in priming. Memory (Hove, England), 13(7), 725–745.CrossRef Barnhardt, T. M. (2005). Number of solutions effects in stem decision: Support for the distinction between identification and production processes in priming. Memory (Hove, England), 13(7), 725–745.CrossRef
go back to reference Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350-375. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2743.CrossRef Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350-375. doi:10.​1006/​jmla.​2000.​2743.CrossRef
go back to reference Bruss, P. J., & Mitchell, D. B. (2009). Memory systems, processes, and tasks: Taxonomic clarification via factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 122, 175–189.PubMed Bruss, P. J., & Mitchell, D. B. (2009). Memory systems, processes, and tasks: Taxonomic clarification via factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 122, 175–189.PubMed
go back to reference Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of the orthographic neighbourhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 857–871.PubMed Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of the orthographic neighbourhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 857–871.PubMed
go back to reference Clarys, D., Isingrini, M., & Haerty, A. (2000). Effects of attentional load and ageing on word-stem and word-fragment implicit memory tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 395–412.CrossRef Clarys, D., Isingrini, M., & Haerty, A. (2000). Effects of attentional load and ageing on word-stem and word-fragment implicit memory tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 395–412.CrossRef
go back to reference Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Crabb, B. T., & Dark, V. J. (1999). Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding. Memory and Cognition, 27(2), 267–275.PubMedCrossRef Crabb, B. T., & Dark, V. J. (1999). Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding. Memory and Cognition, 27(2), 267–275.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Crabb, B. T., & Dark, V. J. (2003). Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding. Memory and Cognition, 31(7), 997–1008.PubMedCrossRef Crabb, B. T., & Dark, V. J. (2003). Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding. Memory and Cognition, 31(7), 997–1008.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Craik, F. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 159–180.CrossRef Craik, F. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 159–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Craik, F. M., Moscovitch, M., & McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 864–875. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.864.PubMedCrossRef Craik, F. M., Moscovitch, M., & McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 864–875. doi:10.​1037/​0278-7393.​20.​4.​864.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.PubMedCrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fleischman, D. A., Monti, L. A., Dwornik, L. M., Moro, T. T., Bennett, D. A., & Gabrieli, J. E. (2001). Impaired production priming and intact identification priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(7), 785–794.PubMed Fleischman, D. A., Monti, L. A., Dwornik, L. M., Moro, T. T., Bennett, D. A., & Gabrieli, J. E. (2001). Impaired production priming and intact identification priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(7), 785–794.PubMed
go back to reference Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighbourhood: Absence of inhibitory neighbourhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696–713.PubMed Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighbourhood: Absence of inhibitory neighbourhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696–713.PubMed
go back to reference Franks, J. J., Bilbrey, C. W., Lien, K. G., & McNamara, T. P. (2000). Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) and repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 28(7), 1140–1151.PubMedCrossRef Franks, J. J., Bilbrey, C. W., Lien, K. G., & McNamara, T. P. (2000). Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) and repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 28(7), 1140–1151.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gabrieli, J. E., Vaidya, C. J., Stone, M., Francis, W. S., Thompson-Schill, S. L., Fleischman, D. A., & Wilson, R. S. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 479–498.CrossRef Gabrieli, J. E., Vaidya, C. J., Stone, M., Francis, W. S., Thompson-Schill, S. L., Fleischman, D. A., & Wilson, R. S. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 479–498.CrossRef
go back to reference Geraci, L. (2006). A test of the frontal lobe functioning hypothesis of age deficits in production priming. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 539–548.PubMedCrossRef Geraci, L. (2006). A test of the frontal lobe functioning hypothesis of age deficits in production priming. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 539–548.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Geraci, L., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Examining the response competition hypothesis of age effects in implicit memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16(6), 683–707.CrossRef Geraci, L., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Examining the response competition hypothesis of age effects in implicit memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16(6), 683–707.CrossRef
go back to reference Geraci, L., Hamilton, M., & Guillory, J. J. (2015). Age effects in implicit memory: The role of response competition induced by relative word frequency. Experimental Aging Research, 41(5), 496–509.CrossRef Geraci, L., Hamilton, M., & Guillory, J. J. (2015). Age effects in implicit memory: The role of response competition induced by relative word frequency. Experimental Aging Research, 41(5), 496–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 592-602. doi:10.3758/BF03211553.CrossRef Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 592-602. doi:10.​3758/​BF03211553.CrossRef
go back to reference Gomes, C. A., & Mayes, A. (2015). Does long-term object priming depend on the explicit detection of objectidentity at encoding? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gomes, C. A., & Mayes, A. (2015). Does long-term object priming depend on the explicit detection of objectidentity at encoding? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.PubMedCrossRef Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 981–998.CrossRef Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 981–998.CrossRef
go back to reference Grainger, J., & Seguý, J. (1990). Neighbourhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191–198.PubMedCrossRef Grainger, J., & Seguý, J. (1990). Neighbourhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191–198.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 757-779. doi:10.1037/a0015262.PubMedCrossRef Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 757-779. doi:10.​1037/​a0015262.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Horton, K. D., Wilson, D. E., Vonk, J., Kirby, S. L., & Nielsen, T. (2005). Measuring automatic retrieval: A comparison of implicit memory, process dissociation, and speeded response procedures. Acta Psychologica, 119(3), 235–263.PubMedCrossRef Horton, K. D., Wilson, D. E., Vonk, J., Kirby, S. L., & Nielsen, T. (2005). Measuring automatic retrieval: A comparison of implicit memory, process dissociation, and speeded response procedures. Acta Psychologica, 119(3), 235–263.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Isingrini, M., Vazou, F., & Leroy, P. (1995). Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 462–467.PubMedCrossRef Isingrini, M., Vazou, F., & Leroy, P. (1995). Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 462–467.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference LaVoie, D. J., & Faulkner, K. M. (2008). Production and identification repetition priming in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15(4), 523–544.CrossRef LaVoie, D. J., & Faulkner, K. M. (2008). Production and identification repetition priming in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15(4), 523–544.CrossRef
go back to reference LaVoie, D. J., Olbinski, B., & Palmer, S. (2015). Degree of handedness and priming: Further evidence for a distinction between production and identification priming mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 151.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef LaVoie, D. J., Olbinski, B., & Palmer, S. (2015). Degree of handedness and priming: Further evidence for a distinction between production and identification priming mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 151.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference MacDonald, P. A., & MacLeod, C. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica, 98(2–3), 291–310.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald, P. A., & MacLeod, C. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica, 98(2–3), 291–310.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactiveactivation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. Anaccount of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–405.CrossRef McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactiveactivation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. Anaccount of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–405.CrossRef
go back to reference Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing (pp. 273–311). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing (pp. 273–311). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
go back to reference Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519–533.CrossRef Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519–533.CrossRef
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory and Cognition, 25(1), 11–17.PubMedCrossRef Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory and Cognition, 25(1), 11–17.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W. (2002). Attention and perceptual implicit memory: Effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 66(3), 157–165.PubMedCrossRef Mulligan, N. W. (2002). Attention and perceptual implicit memory: Effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 66(3), 157–165.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W. (2003). Effects of cross-modal and intramodal division of attention on perceptual implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 262–276.PubMed Mulligan, N. W. (2003). Effects of cross-modal and intramodal division of attention on perceptual implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 262–276.PubMed
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W., & Besken, M. (2013). Implicit memory. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 220–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Mulligan, N. W., & Besken, M. (2013). Implicit memory. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 220–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 453–465.PubMedCrossRef Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 453–465.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W., & Hornstein, S. L. (2000). Attention and perceptual priming in the perceptual identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 626–637.PubMed Mulligan, N. W., & Hornstein, S. L. (2000). Attention and perceptual priming in the perceptual identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 626–637.PubMed
go back to reference Mulligan, N. W., & Peterson, D. (2008). Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 662–679.PubMed Mulligan, N. W., & Peterson, D. (2008). Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 662–679.PubMed
go back to reference Newell, B. R., Cavenett, T., & Andrews, S. (2008). On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention. Memory and Cognition, 36(4), 725–734.PubMedCrossRef Newell, B. R., Cavenett, T., & Andrews, S. (2008). On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention. Memory and Cognition, 36(4), 725–734.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference O’Malley, S., Reynolds, M. G., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2008). Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 422–429.PubMed O’Malley, S., Reynolds, M. G., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2008). Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 422–429.PubMed
go back to reference Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation verification model for letter andword recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573–594.PubMedCrossRef Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation verification model for letter andword recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573–594.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory and Cognition, 18(5), 507–514.PubMedCrossRef Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory and Cognition, 18(5), 507–514.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Prull, M. W. (2004). Exploring the identification-production hypothesis of repetition priming in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 108–124.PubMedCrossRef Prull, M. W. (2004). Exploring the identification-production hypothesis of repetition priming in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 108–124.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Prull, M. W. (2010). Age-related influences on repetition priming in the verb generation task: Examining the role of response competition. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(4), 439–461.CrossRef Prull, M. W. (2010). Age-related influences on repetition priming in the verb generation task: Examining the role of response competition. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(4), 439–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Prull, M. W. (2013). Attention and repetition priming in the verb generation task. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 218–226.PubMedCrossRef Prull, M. W. (2013). Attention and repetition priming in the verb generation task. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 218–226.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1303–1323.PubMed Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1303–1323.PubMed
go back to reference Roediger, H., & McDermott, K. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Roediger, H., & McDermott, K. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., & Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1251–1269.PubMed Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., & Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1251–1269.PubMed
go back to reference Schacter, D. L. (1994). Priming and multiple memory system: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In D. L. Schacter, E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 233-268). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Schacter, D. L. (1994). Priming and multiple memory system: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In D. L. Schacter, E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 233-268). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1996). The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(2), 111–125.PubMedCrossRef Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1996). The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(2), 111–125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighbourhood size and neighbourhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876–900. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighbourhood size and neighbourhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876–900.
go back to reference Sears, C. R., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (1999). Orthographic neighbourhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: A test of the multiple read-out model. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(8), 1537–1554.PubMedCrossRef Sears, C. R., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (1999). Orthographic neighbourhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: A test of the multiple read-out model. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(8), 1537–1554.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spataro, P., Cestari, V., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011a). The relationship between divided attention and implicit memory: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 329–339.PubMedCrossRef Spataro, P., Cestari, V., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011a). The relationship between divided attention and implicit memory: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 329–339.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spataro, P., Longobardi, E., Saraulli, D., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2013). Interactive effects of age-of-acquisition and repetition priming in the lexical decision task. Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 1–8.CrossRef Spataro, P., Longobardi, E., Saraulli, D., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2013). Interactive effects of age-of-acquisition and repetition priming in the lexical decision task. Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 1–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Spataro, P., Mulligan, N., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2010). Effects of divided attention in the word-fragment completion task with unique and multiple solutions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 18–45. doi:10.1080/09541440802685979.CrossRef Spataro, P., Mulligan, N., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2010). Effects of divided attention in the word-fragment completion task with unique and multiple solutions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 18–45. doi:10.​1080/​0954144080268597​9.CrossRef
go back to reference Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011b). Attention and implicit memory: The role of the activation of multiple representations. Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 110–116.PubMedCrossRef Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011b). Attention and implicit memory: The role of the activation of multiple representations. Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 110–116.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Szymanski, K. F., & MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 5(1–2), 165–175.CrossRef Szymanski, K. F., & MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 5(1–2), 165–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(4), 336–342. Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(4), 336–342.
go back to reference Vaidya, C., Gabrieli, J. E., Keane, M. M., Monti, L. A., Gutiérrez-Rivas, H., & Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1324–1343.PubMed Vaidya, C., Gabrieli, J. E., Keane, M. M., Monti, L. A., Gutiérrez-Rivas, H., & Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1324–1343.PubMed
go back to reference Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Gollan, T. H. (2016). Linking recognition and production: Cross-modal transfer effects between picture naming and lexical decision during first and second language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 37–54. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.003.CrossRef Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Gollan, T. H. (2016). Linking recognition and production: Cross-modal transfer effects between picture naming and lexical decision during first and second language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 37–54. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jml.​2016.​02.​003.CrossRef
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2016). Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 75–94.CrossRef Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2016). Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 75–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart’s neighbourhood: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68(2), B53–B62.PubMedCrossRef Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart’s neighbourhood: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68(2), B53–B62.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision
Auteurs
Pietro Spataro
Daniele Saraulli
Neil W. Mulligan
Vincenzo Cestari
Marco Costanzi
Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Publicatiedatum
11-03-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0852-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2018

Psychological Research 4/2018 Naar de uitgave