Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2018

11-03-2017 | Original Article

Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations

Auteurs: Patricia Hirsch, Sophie Nolden, Andrea M. Philipp, Iring Koch

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

To examine whether hierarchical higher level task representations comprising the task sets of Task 1 (T1) and Task 2 (T2) are activated within each trial in dual-task situations, we combined the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm with the task-pair switching logic (Hirsch et al. 2017). In Experiment 1, in which subjects switched between task-pairs including a varying T1 and a constant T2, we found a PRP effect (i.e., worse performance with short stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA] than with long SOA) and task-pair switch costs in T1 and T2 (impaired performance in task-pair switches compared to task-pair repetitions). However, since in Experiment 1 there were no forward and backward response–response compatibility effects that indicated interference between T1 and T2, we could not exclude that the activation of T1 persisted into the next trial despite the intervening T2, and hence, that task-pair switch costs are due to repetition-priming effects of T1 across task-pairs rather than due to persisting activation of task-pair representations. In Experiment 2, we used a modified task-pair switching logic with a constant T1 and a varying T2, and replicated task-pair switch costs under conditions that not only rule out repetition-priming effects of T1 across task-pairs as the source of task-pair switch costs but also disentangle the effects of switching task-pairs from those of switching T1. These effects were associated in previous studies using the original task-pair switching logic. Thus, the findings of the present study strongly suggest that hierarchical higher level task representations are activated during dual-task processing.
Voetnoten
1
To examine whether this trend was due to response grouping, we analysed inter-response intervals (IRIs; i.e., time interval between the response for T1 and for T2). We considered IRIs less than 200 ms to be indicative of response grouping (e.g., De Jong 1993). Overall, there were 3.8% trials with IRIs less than 200 ms. Moreover, the analysis showed that one participant grouped the responses in 20.9% of the trials. The result pattern did not change if the subject who showed an extreme grouping behaviour and the trials with IRIs less than 200 ms were excluded from all analyses. However, the SOA effect on T1 was statistically smaller, F(1, 22) = 3.23, p = .09, η p² = 0.13. In Experiment 1, we identified 0.56% trials with IRIs less than 200 ms. The result pattern did not change if these trials were discarded from all analyses. The proportion of grouped trials was larger in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. The main difference between the experiments is that in Experiment 1, T1 varied and T2 remained constant across task-pairs, whereas in Experiment 2, T1 was constant and T2 varied across task-pairs. Thus, in Experiment 2, subjects had to maintain the task-pair cue during T1 processing and until the presentation of S2 in working memory, whereas in Experiment 1, the task-pair cue was already relevant for T1. The maintenance of the task-pair cue in working memory during T1 processing or until the presentation of S2 might have promoted response grouping in Experiment 2.
 
2
To examine whether task-pair switch costs differ depending on whether the SOA in the previous trial was repeated or switched, we ran additional ANOVAs with the within-subjects variables task-pair sequence (task-pair switch vs. task-pair repetition) and SOA sequence (SOA switch vs. SOA repetition) for trials with a short SOA. In the following, to avoid redundancy, we report only effects including the SOA sequence variable. In Experiment 1, we exclude one participant from all analysis due to an overall error rate of <25%. For the error rates in T2, there was a trend toward more erroneous responses in SOA repetition trials than in SOA switch trials (6.9 vs. 5.6%). However, like all other effects, all ps > 0.15, the main effect of SOA sequence was not significant, F(1, 22) = 3.69, p = .068, η p² = 0.14. In Experiment 2, task-pair switch costs for the error rates in T2 were numerically larger in SOA switch trials than in SOA repetition trials (5.6 vs. 2.1%). However, the interaction of task-pair sequence and SOA was not significant, F(1, 22) = 3.72, p = .066, η p² = 0.14. All other effects were non-significant, too, all ps > 0.16.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Conscious and nonconscious information processing: Attention and performance XV. (pp. 421–452). Cambridge: MIT Press. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Conscious and nonconscious information processing: Attention and performance XV. (pp. 421–452). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing paradigm: Are there true task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484–502. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.484.PubMed Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing paradigm: Are there true task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484–502. doi:10.​1037/​0278-7393.​33.​3.​484.PubMed
go back to reference Fischer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2015). Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1482–1487. doi:10.1037/xhp0000157.PubMed Fischer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2015). Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1482–1487. doi:10.​1037/​xhp0000157.PubMed
go back to reference Heuer, H. (1991). Motor constraints in dual-task performance. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple task performance (pp. 173–204). London: Taylor & Francis. Heuer, H. (1991). Motor constraints in dual-task performance. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple task performance (pp. 173–204). London: Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., & Koch, I. (2017). Higher-order cognitive control in dual-tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., & Koch, I. (2017). Higher-order cognitive control in dual-tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
go back to reference Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 640–653. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.27.3.640. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 640–653. doi:10.​1037/​/​0278-7393.​27.​3.​640.
go back to reference Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. doi:10.1037/a0019842.CrossRefPubMed Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. doi:10.​1037/​a0019842.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lien, M. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 697–713. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697.PubMed Lien, M. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 697–713. doi:10.​1037/​0278-7393.​30.​3.​697.PubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response type on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70, 484–493. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response type on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70, 484–493. doi:10.​1007/​s00426-005-0011-9.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493–516. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493.PubMed Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493–516. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​32.​3.​493.PubMed
go back to reference Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64.CrossRef Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Rangelov, D., Töllner, T., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). What are task-sets: A single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations? Frontierts in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00524. Rangelov, D., Töllner, T., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). What are task-sets: A single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations? Frontierts in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.​3389/​fnhum.​2013.​00524.
go back to reference Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566–582. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.566.PubMed Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566–582. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​30.​3.​566.PubMed
go back to reference Szameitat, A. J., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: An event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70, 541–552. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0015-5.CrossRefPubMed Szameitat, A. J., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: An event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70, 541–552. doi:10.​1007/​s00426-005-0015-5.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vandierendonck, A., Christiaens, E., & Liefooghe, B. (2008). On the representation of taks information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1248–1261. doi:10.3758/MC.36.7.1248.CrossRef Vandierendonck, A., Christiaens, E., & Liefooghe, B. (2008). On the representation of taks information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1248–1261. doi:10.​3758/​MC.​36.​7.​1248.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations
Auteurs
Patricia Hirsch
Sophie Nolden
Andrea M. Philipp
Iring Koch
Publicatiedatum
11-03-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0851-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2018

Psychological Research 4/2018 Naar de uitgave