Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude

Auteurs: Gillian Dale, Karen M. Arnell

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

When the second of two targets (T2) is presented temporally close to the first target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation stream, accuracy to identify T2 is markedly reduced—an attentional blink (AB). While most individuals show an AB, Dale and Arnell (Atten Percept Psychophys 72(3):602–606, 2010) demonstrated that individual differences in dispositional attentional focus predicted AB performance, such that individuals who showed a natural bias toward the global level of Navon letter stimuli were less susceptible to the AB and showed a smaller AB effect. For the current study, we extended the findings of Dale and Arnell (Atten Percept Psychophys 72(3):602–606, 2010) through two experiments. In Experiment 1, we examined the relationship between dispositional global/local bias and the AB using a highly reliable hierarchical shape task measure. In Experiment 2, we examined whether three distinct global/local measures could predict AB performance. In both experiments, performance on the global/local tasks predicted subsequent AB performance, such that individuals with a greater preference for the global information showed a reduced AB. This supports previous findings, as well as recent models which discuss the role of attentional breadth in selective attention.
Voetnoten
1
Previous studies have shown that an overall global processing advantage often emerges when using traditional global/local stimuli (e.g., Navon, 1981). However, other studies (e.g., Kimchi & Palmer, 1982) have shown that this global advantage can be modulated by the relative size of the stimuli and by the number of local elements included in a global figure (i.e., the density of the figure). This is problematic for individual differences research, as this means that participants can become artificially biased toward global or local stimuli unless the stimuli are equated in terms of perceptual salience (e.g., Fredrickson & Branigan, 2005; Kimchi, 1992; Kimchi & Palmer, 1982). As such, we used the stimuli of Dale and Arnell (2013a, Experiment 1) for both Experiments 1 and 2 as these have been shown to have equally salient global and local levels, such that the stimuli are roughly global/local neutral.
 
2
One of the additional tasks was an unrelated cognitive maze task used as a filler and the other was a Navon task. In addition to having two blocks of AB trials, 120 AB trials in both blocks were further subdivided into 10 mini-blocks of 12 trials each, with a 1 min Navon letter task interspersed. The Navon task had no effect on the AB trials for the first versus second block, and there were no significant differences among these mini-blocks, F < 1, thus the data were ultimately collapsed both within block and across block.
 
3
When conducting an individual differences study, it is not ideal to counterbalance the tasks’ order across participants. Performance on the tasks may differ somewhat based on the order in which they are presented; therefore a participant’s relative score on a given task could be confounded with order variability if order was counterbalanced or random. This confound can be removed in individual differences studies using a constant task order, which is why all participants ran the tasks in the same order here.
 
4
Note that while there are several issues surrounding the dichotomization of variables (see MacCallum, Zhang, Preacher, & Rucker, 2002), the data were split here as a supplement to the correlational analyses that were already conducted, and to allow for a better visualization of the pattern of results.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Arend, I., Johnston, S., & Shapiro, K. (2006). Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 600–607. doi:10.3758/BF03193969.CrossRef Arend, I., Johnston, S., & Shapiro, K. (2006). Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 600–607. doi:10.​3758/​BF03193969.CrossRef
go back to reference Arnell, K. M., Stokes, K. A., MacLean, M. H., & Gicante, C. (2010). Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity. Psychological Research, 74(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0200-4.PubMedCrossRef Arnell, K. M., Stokes, K. A., MacLean, M. H., & Gicante, C. (2010). Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity. Psychological Research, 74(1), 1–11. doi:10.​1007/​s00426-008-0200-4.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Christianson, S. Å., & Loftus, E. F. (1990). Some characteristics of people’s traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 195–198.CrossRef Christianson, S. Å., & Loftus, E. F. (1990). Some characteristics of people’s traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 195–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Chun, M.M., & Potter, M.C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109 Chun, M.M., & Potter, M.C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​21.​1.​109
go back to reference Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1051–1057. doi:10.3758/BF03193090.CrossRef  Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1051–1057. doi:10.​3758/​BF03193090.CrossRef
go back to reference Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2010). Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 602–606. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.602.CrossRef Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2010). Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 602–606. doi:10.​3758/​APP.​72.​3.​602.CrossRef
go back to reference Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2013a). Investigating the stability of and relationships among global/local processing measures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 394–406. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0416-7.CrossRef Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2013a). Investigating the stability of and relationships among global/local processing measures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 394–406. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-012-0416-7.CrossRef
go back to reference Dale G., & Arnell, K.M. Lost in the forest, stuck in the trees: dispositional global/local bias is resistant to exposure to high and low spatial frequencies. PLOS ONE (in Press). Dale G., & Arnell, K.M. Lost in the forest, stuck in the trees: dispositional global/local bias is resistant to exposure to high and low spatial frequencies. PLOS ONE (in Press).
go back to reference Dale, G., Dux, P.E., & Arnell, K.M. (2013). Individual differences within and across attentional blink tasks revisited. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 456–467. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0415-8. Dale, G., Dux, P.E., & Arnell, K.M. (2013). Individual differences within and across attentional blink tasks revisited. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 456–467. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-012-0415-8.
go back to reference Dell’Acqua, R., Dux, P. E., Wyble, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2012). Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 232–238. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0209-3.CrossRef Dell’Acqua, R., Dux, P. E., Wyble, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2012). Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 232–238. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-011-0209-3.CrossRef
go back to reference Deruelle, C., Rondan, C., Salle-Collemiche, X., Bastard-Rosset, D., & Da Fonséca, D. (2008). Attention to low- and high-spatial frequencies in categorizing facial identities, emotions and gender in children with autism. Brain and Cognition, 66, 115–123. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.06.001.PubMedCrossRef Deruelle, C., Rondan, C., Salle-Collemiche, X., Bastard-Rosset, D., & Da Fonséca, D. (2008). Attention to low- and high-spatial frequencies in categorizing facial identities, emotions and gender in children with autism. Brain and Cognition, 66, 115–123. doi:10.​1016/​j.​bandc.​2007.​06.​001.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332.CrossRef Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332.CrossRef
go back to reference Kawahara, J. (2009). When do additional distractors reduce the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1043–1061. doi:10.1037/a0012727.PubMed Kawahara, J. (2009). When do additional distractors reduce the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1043–1061. doi:10.​1037/​a0012727.PubMed
go back to reference Kellie, F. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (2004). Object-file continuity predicts attentional blink magnitude. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 692–712.PubMedCrossRef Kellie, F. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (2004). Object-file continuity predicts attentional blink magnitude. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 692–712.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference MacLean, M. H., & Arnell, K. M. (2013). Individual differences in electrophysiological responses to performance feedback predict AB magnitude. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 270–283. doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0140-8.CrossRef MacLean, M. H., & Arnell, K. M. (2013). Individual differences in electrophysiological responses to performance feedback predict AB magnitude. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 270–283. doi:10.​3758/​s13415-012-0140-8.CrossRef
go back to reference MacLean, M. H., Arnell, K. M., & Busseri, M. A. (2010). Dispositional affect predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1431–1438.CrossRef MacLean, M. H., Arnell, K. M., & Busseri, M. A. (2010). Dispositional affect predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1431–1438.CrossRef
go back to reference Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 630–633.CrossRef Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 630–633.CrossRef
go back to reference Nieuwenstein, M. R., & Potter, M. C. (2006). Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding a comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation. Psychological Science, 17, 471–475.PubMedCrossRef Nieuwenstein, M. R., & Potter, M. C. (2006). Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding a comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation. Psychological Science, 17, 471–475.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Olivers, C. N., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 364–379. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.364.PubMed Olivers, C. N., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 364–379. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​32.​2.​364.PubMed
go back to reference Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849.PubMed Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​18.​3.​849.PubMed
go back to reference Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 383–388.CrossRef Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 383–388.CrossRef
go back to reference Shapiro, K., Schmitz, F., Martens, S., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink. Neuroreport, 17, 163–166.PubMedCrossRef Shapiro, K., Schmitz, F., Martens, S., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink. Neuroreport, 17, 163–166.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.CrossRef Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude
Auteurs
Gillian Dale
Karen M. Arnell
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0591-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2015

Psychological Research 4/2015 Naar de uitgave