Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2015 | Original Article

The preservation of response inhibition aftereffects in a location-based spatial negative priming task: younger versus older adults

Auteurs: Eric Buckolz, Michael Lok, Ben Kajaste, Cameron Edgar, Michael Khan

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2015

Abstract

Younger (M = 21 years) and older (M = 74 years) adults completed a spatial negative priming (SNP) task where (central) events (i.e., target or distractor) are presented in trial pairs: first the prime and then the probe. Free-choice trials were included (1 location: 2 permissible responses), which allowed us to isolate response inhibition and its consequent inhibitory aftereffects (i.e., current inhibition interferes with later related processing—e.g., SNP). The inhibitory aftereffects associated with the suppression of responses activated by distractor-occupied locations were highly comparable for younger and older adults; including similar SNP effect sizes, a significant tendency to select against former distractor (inhibited) responses (within-hand finger options) on free-choice trials, and latency delays attributable solely to the use of self-selected distractor responses. Aftereffects generated by target-occupied prime trials locations were also the same for both age groups; recently executed target responses were selected for and produced faster responding (within hand). Aftereffects were absent on between-hand free-choice trials and, overall, response selection determinants on free-choice trials matched for older and younger adults.

vorige artikel Map learning and the alignment effect in young and older adults: how do they gain from having a map available while performing pointing tasks?

volgende artikel Simon in action: the effect of spatial congruency on grasping trajectories

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Baylis, G. C., Tipper, S. P., & Houghton, G. (1997). Externally cued and internally generated selection: Differences in distractor analysis and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1617–1630.PubMed

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon effect. Psychology of Aging, 19, 290–303.CrossRef

Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Permangon Press.CrossRef

Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002a). The influence of probe-trial selection requirements on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 274–283.CrossRef

Buckolz, E., Mandich, A., & Polatajko, H. (2002b). The Simon task as a measure of response inhibition. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 42, 383–400.

Buckolz, E., Goldfarb, A., & Khan, M. (2004). The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 837–845.CrossRef

Buckolz, E., Avramidis, C., & Fitzgeorge, L. (2008). Prime-trial demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task. Psychological Research, 72, 235–248.PubMedCrossRef

Buckolz, E., Edgar, C., Kajaste, B., Lok, M., & Khan, M. (2012). Preventing the spatial negative priming effect: blocking the response-based retrieval of prime-trial distractor representations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1632–1643.CrossRef

Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRef

Connelly, S. L., & Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(6), 1238–1250.PubMed

DeJong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.

Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.PubMedCrossRef

Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.CrossRef

Fitzgeorge, L., & Buckolz, E. (2008). Spatial negative priming modulation: The influence of probe-trial target cueing, distractor presence, and an intervening response. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(33), 994–1026.CrossRef

Fitzgeorge, L., Buckolz, E., & Khan, M. (2011). Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(5), 1435–1452.CrossRef

Germain, S., & Collette, F. (2008). Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibitory processes in young and elderly participants using the Simon task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 1014–1021.PubMedCrossRef

Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Khan, M. (2006). The locus of location repetition latency effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 307–318.PubMedCrossRef

Haworth, P. (2013). The role of probe-trial distractors in the production/removal of the spatial negative priming effect. (Unpublished Masters Thesis). Published in the Scholarship@Western Electronic thesis and Dissertation Repository (ETD #2920). Western Univeristy, London, Ontario, Canada.

Klein, R., Christie, J., & Morris, E. P. (2005). Vector averaging of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 295–300.CrossRef

Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491–512.PubMedCrossRef

Kubo-Kawai, N., & Kawai, N. (2010). Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 452–464.CrossRef

Lupianez, J., Klein, R., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1003–1014.PubMedCrossRef

Maylor, E. A., Birak, K. S., & Schlaghecken, F. (2011). Inhibitory motor control in old age: evidence for de-automatization? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–9.CrossRef

Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2007). Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie? Journal of Psychology, 215(1), 35–51.CrossRef

Mayr, S., Buchner, A., Moller, M., & Hauke, R. (2011). Spatial and identity negative priming audition: Evidence of feature binding in auditory spatial memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1710–1732.CrossRef

McAuliffe, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2006). Object- and location-based inhibition of return in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 406–410.PubMedCrossRef

McDowd, J. M., & Oseas-Kreger, D. M. (1991). Aging, inhibitory processes, and negative priming. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 340–345.CrossRef

Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relationship between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(6), 1280–1296.PubMedCrossRef

Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, (1994). Negative priming in a spatial localization task: Feature mismatching and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 624–646.

Moller, M., Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2013). Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(1), 132–144.CrossRef

Neill, W. T. (2007). Mechanisms of transfer-inappropriate processing. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. Macleod (Eds.), Inhibition in Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., & Valdes, L. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 119–121.CrossRef

Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 613–623.PubMed

Rafal, R., Davies, J., & Lauder, J. (2006). Inhibitory tagging at subsequently fixated locations: Generation of “inhibition of return” without saccade inhibition. Visual Cognition, 13, 308–323.CrossRef

Schlaghecken, F., Birak, K. S., & Maylor, E. A. (2012). Correction to Schlaghecken, Birak, and Maylor (2012). Psychology and Aging, 27, 541–542.PubMedCrossRef

Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 148–162.PubMedCrossRef

Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2006). Active masks and active inhibition: a comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 484–494.CrossRef

Schlaghecken, F., Rowley, L., Sembi, S., Simmons, R., & Whitcomb, D. (2007). The negative compatibility effect: A case for self-inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 227–240.PubMedCentralCrossRef

Stoddart, A. (2013). The error protection impact of inhibitory after-effects in location-based tasks and their preservation with practice. Published in the Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository (ETD # 2586). Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Stoltzfus, E. R., Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., Ulivi, M. S., & Goldstein, D. (1993). Investigations of inhibition and interference in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 179–188.CrossRef

Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–343.CrossRef

Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 492–504.PubMed

Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Milliken, B. (1995). Spatial negative priming without mismatching: Comment on Park and Kanwisher (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1220–1229.

Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282–299.

Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 355–365.CrossRef

Titel: The preservation of response inhibition aftereffects in a location-based spatial negative priming task: younger versus older adults
Auteurs: Eric Buckolz
Michael Lok
Ben Kajaste
Cameron Edgar
Michael Khan
Publicatiedatum: 01-01-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0541-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2015

Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks

Simon in action: the effect of spatial congruency on grasping trajectories

Multiplication facts and the mental number line: evidence from unbounded number line estimation

Tracking the attentional blink profile: a cross-sectional study from childhood to adolescence

Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict

Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory