Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Article

“Deafness” effects in detecting alterations to auditory feedback during sequence production

Auteur: Peter Q. Pfordresher

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Past research has shown that when discrete responses are associated with a perceptual goal, performers may have difficulty detecting stimuli that are commensurate with that goal. Three experiments are reported here that test whether such effects extend to sequence production. In Experiment 1, participants performed 8-note melodies repeatedly, and on each trial a single tone could be altered with respect to its pitch and/or synchrony with actions. Results suggested a selective deficit of detection when feedback pitch was unchanged and the event was slightly delayed. Experiment 2 showed that this “deafness” to feedback is limited to rhythmic motor tasks that require sequencing, in that similar effects did not emerge when participants produced pitch sequences by tapping a single key repeatedly. A third experiment demonstrated similar results to Experiment 1 when the mapping of keys to pitches on the keyboard was reversed. Taken together, results suggest a selective deafness to response-congruent delayed feedback, consistent with the idea that performers suppress previously planned events during production.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Early asynchronies were complicated to implement. For early asynchronies that were associated with the correct (unaltered) pitch, FTAP generated normal auditory feedback for the keypress that preceded the probe position; in addition, that keypress generated a second delayed feedback event that had a MIDI pitch matching the pitch associated with the probe position. Then, when the participant pressed the key at the actual probe position, no feedback would be presented. The delay preceding the probe was set to be 66 % of the predicted IOI. Thus, participants experienced the illusion that the tone they produced occurred early (by 33 % of the IOI preceding the probe position), when in fact the tone was associated with delayed feedback, with altered pitch, from the previous keypress. A similar procedure was followed for early asynchronies combined with an altered pitch, only in such cases the pitch of delayed feedback from the preceding keypress was shifted up or down relative to the pitch intended for the probe position.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Chase, R. A. (1965). An information-flow model of the organization of motor activity. I: Transduction, transmission and central control of sensory information. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 140, 239–251.PubMedCrossRef Chase, R. A. (1965). An information-flow model of the organization of motor activity. I: Transduction, transmission and central control of sensory information. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 140, 239–251.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Couchman, J. J., Beasley, R., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2012). Auditory feedback, self-attribution, and the experience of agency in sequence production. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 186–203.PubMedCrossRef Couchman, J. J., Beasley, R., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2012). Auditory feedback, self-attribution, and the experience of agency in sequence production. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 186–203.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147.PubMedCrossRef Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ellis, R. J., & Jones, M. R. (2009). The Role of Accent Salience and Joint Accent Structure in Meter Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 264–280.PubMed Ellis, R. J., & Jones, M. R. (2009). The Role of Accent Salience and Joint Accent Structure in Meter Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 264–280.PubMed
go back to reference Finney, S. A. (2001). FTAP: A Linux-based program for tapping and music experiments. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 33, 65–72.CrossRef Finney, S. A. (2001). FTAP: A Linux-based program for tapping and music experiments. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 33, 65–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Furuya, S., & Soechting, J. (2010). Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 223–237.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Furuya, S., & Soechting, J. (2010). Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 223–237.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Guenther, F. H. (1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review, 102, 594–621.PubMedCrossRef Guenther, F. H. (1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review, 102, 594–621.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hébert, S., & Peretz, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory & cognition, 25, 518–533.CrossRef Hébert, S., & Peretz, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory & cognition, 25, 518–533.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 849–937. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 849–937.
go back to reference Howell, P. (2001). A model of timing interference to speech control in normal and altered listening conditions applied to the treatment of stuttering. In B. Maassen, W. Hulsijn, R. Kent, H. F. M. Peters & P. H. M. M. van-Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 291–294). Nijmegen: Uttgeverij Vantilt. Howell, P. (2001). A model of timing interference to speech control in normal and altered listening conditions applied to the treatment of stuttering. In B. Maassen, W. Hulsijn, R. Kent, H. F. M. Peters & P. H. M. M. van-Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 291–294). Nijmegen: Uttgeverij Vantilt.
go back to reference Howell, P., Powell, D. J., & Khan, I. (1983). Amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 772–784. Howell, P., Powell, D. J., & Khan, I. (1983). Amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 772–784.
go back to reference Hubbard, T. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822–851.CrossRef Hubbard, T. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822–851.CrossRef
go back to reference Jäncke, L. (2002). The case of a left-handed pianists playing a reversed keyboard: A challenge for the neuroscience of music. NeuroReport, 13, 1579–1583.PubMedCrossRef Jäncke, L. (2002). The case of a left-handed pianists playing a reversed keyboard: A challenge for the neuroscience of music. NeuroReport, 13, 1579–1583.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Johnston, H. M., & Jones, M. R. (2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 2–17.PubMed Johnston, H. M., & Jones, M. R. (2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 2–17.PubMed
go back to reference Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension—Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323–355.PubMedCrossRef Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension—Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83, 323–355.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jones, M. R., Johnston, H. M., & Puente, J. (2006). Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 59–96.PubMedCrossRef Jones, M. R., Johnston, H. M., & Puente, J. (2006). Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 59–96.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16, 307–354.CrossRef Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16, 307–354.CrossRef
go back to reference Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Biology, 9, 718–727. Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Biology, 9, 718–727.
go back to reference Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.CrossRef Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.CrossRef
go back to reference Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Krumhansl, C. L. (2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 159–179.PubMedCrossRef Krumhansl, C. L. (2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 159–179.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Large, E. W. (1993). Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 238–241.CrossRef Large, E. W. (1993). Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 238–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119–159.CrossRef Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley. Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189–1207.PubMed Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189–1207.PubMed
go back to reference MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
go back to reference Maidhof, C., Vavatzanidis, N., Prinz, W., Rieger, M., & Koelsch, S. (2010). Processing Expectancy Violations during Music Performance and Perception: An ERP Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2401–2413.PubMedCrossRef Maidhof, C., Vavatzanidis, N., Prinz, W., Rieger, M., & Koelsch, S. (2010). Processing Expectancy Violations during Music Performance and Perception: An ERP Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2401–2413.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMed Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMed
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125–129.CrossRef Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Palmer, C., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003). Incremental planning in sequence production. Psychological Review, 110, 683–712.PubMedCrossRef Palmer, C., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003). Incremental planning in sequence production. Psychological Review, 110, 683–712.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Palmer, C., & van de Sande, C. (1993). Units of knowledge in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 457–470.PubMedCrossRef Palmer, C., & van de Sande, C. (1993). Units of knowledge in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 457–470.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Palmer, C., & van de Sande, C. (1995). Range of planning in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 947–962.PubMed Palmer, C., & van de Sande, C. (1995). Range of planning in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 947–962.PubMed
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003). Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 949–964.PubMed Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003). Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 949–964.PubMed
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q. (2005). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1331–1345.PubMed Pfordresher, P. Q. (2005). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1331–1345.PubMed
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006). Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. Special Issue: Music performance, 2, 183–198. Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006). Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. Special Issue: Music performance, 2, 183–198.
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q. (2012). Musical training and the role of auditory feedback during performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 171–178.PubMedCrossRef Pfordresher, P. Q. (2012). Musical training and the role of auditory feedback during performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 171–178.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q., & Dalla-Bella, S. (2011). Delayed auditory feedback and movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 566–579.PubMed Pfordresher, P. Q., & Dalla-Bella, S. (2011). Delayed auditory feedback and movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 566–579.PubMed
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q., & Kulpa, J. D. (2011). The dynamics of disruption from altered auditory feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 949–967.PubMed Pfordresher, P. Q., & Kulpa, J. D. (2011). The dynamics of disruption from altered auditory feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 949–967.PubMed
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q., & Palmer, C. (2006). Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 362–376.PubMedCrossRef Pfordresher, P. Q., & Palmer, C. (2006). Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 362–376.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pfordresher, P. Q., Palmer, C., & Jungers, M. K. (2007). Speed, Accuracy, and Serial Order in Sequence Production. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31, 1–36.CrossRef Pfordresher, P. Q., Palmer, C., & Jungers, M. K. (2007). Speed, Accuracy, and Serial Order in Sequence Production. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31, 1–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Prince, J. B., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2012). The role of pitch and temporal diversity in the perception and production of musical sequence. Acta Psychologica, 141, 184–198.PubMedCrossRef Prince, J. B., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2012). The role of pitch and temporal diversity in the perception and production of musical sequence. Acta Psychologica, 141, 184–198.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Prince, J. B., Schmuckler, M. A., & Thompson, W. F. (2009a). The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music. Memory and Cognition, 37, 368–381.PubMedCrossRef Prince, J. B., Schmuckler, M. A., & Thompson, W. F. (2009a). The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music. Memory and Cognition, 37, 368–381.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Prince, J. B., Thompson, W. F., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2009b). Pitch and time, tonality and meter: How do musical dimensions combine? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1598–1617.PubMed Prince, J. B., Thompson, W. F., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2009b). Pitch and time, tonality and meter: How do musical dimensions combine? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1598–1617.PubMed
go back to reference Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umilta, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129.PubMedCrossRef Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umilta, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974.PubMedCrossRef Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73. Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73.
go back to reference Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25.
go back to reference Vousden, J. I., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). To repeat or not to repeat: The time course of response suppression in sequential behaviour. In J. A. Bullinaria, D. W. Glasspool, & G. Houghton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop: Connectionist Representations. London: Springer. Vousden, J. I., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). To repeat or not to repeat: The time course of response suppression in sequential behaviour. In J. A. Bullinaria, D. W. Glasspool, & G. Houghton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop: Connectionist Representations. London: Springer.
go back to reference Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101–175.PubMedCrossRef Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101–175.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wheeldon, L. R., Meyer, A. S., & Smith, M. (2002). Incrementality. In R. Goldstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science. London: Macmillan. Wheeldon, L. R., Meyer, A. S., & Smith, M. (2002). Incrementality. In R. Goldstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science. London: Macmillan.
go back to reference Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209–216.PubMedCrossRef Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209–216.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
“Deafness” effects in detecting alterations to auditory feedback during sequence production
Auteur
Peter Q. Pfordresher
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0477-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2014

Psychological Research 1/2014 Naar de uitgave