Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Original Article

The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes

Auteurs: Andreas B. Eder, Jochen Müsseler, Bernhard Hommel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Two experiments examined the hypothesis that preparing an action with a specific affective connotation involves the binding of this action to an affective code reflecting this connotation. This integration into an action plan should lead to a temporary occupation of the affective code, which should impair the concurrent representation of affectively congruent events, such as the planning of another action with the same valence. This hypothesis was tested with a dual-task setup that required a speeded choice between approach- and avoidance-type lever movements after having planned and before having executed an evaluative button press. In line with the code-occupation hypothesis, slower lever movements were observed when the lever movement was affectively compatible with the prepared evaluative button press than when the two actions were affectively incompatible. Lever movements related to approach and avoidance and evaluative button presses thus seem to share a code that represents affective meaning. A model of affective action control that is based on the theory of event coding is discussed.
Voetnoten
1
In supplementary analyses, direction of lever movement (toward vs. away) did not moderate the effects of the congruency factor. Therefore, data were collapsed across both congruent and incongruent movement-key sequences in Experiment 1 and 2.
 
2
One might wonder whether this apparent lack of impact of action planning (here: of the button press) on stimulus identification (here: of the affective words) should be considered a failure to replicate Eder and Klauer (2007). However, so far action-planning effects on the processing of affective (Eder & Klauer, 2007, 2009) and non-affective stimuli (e.g., Müsseler & Hommel, 1997) have been obtained with briefly flashed masked stimuli, in unspeeded tasks, and on accuracy measures only, which does not conflict with failing to obtain such an effect in a speeded reaction-time task with clearly identifiable stimuli. One (theoretically very interesting) possibility for this difference might be that identifying a perceptually degraded stimulus requires the binding of its features (a process that would be impaired by having just bound one of these features to an action plan), whereas responding to a clearly visible stimulus does not.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Bamford, S., & Ward, R. (2008). Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion, 8, 174–183.PubMedCrossRef Bamford, S., & Ward, R. (2008). Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion, 8, 174–183.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166–173.PubMedCrossRef Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166–173.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298.PubMedCrossRef Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.CrossRef Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.CrossRef
go back to reference De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 45–61.CrossRef De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 45–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). Common valence coding in action and evaluation: Affective blindness towards response-compatible stimuli. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1297–1322.CrossRef Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). Common valence coding in action and evaluation: Affective blindness towards response-compatible stimuli. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1297–1322.CrossRef
go back to reference Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235.CrossRef Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235.CrossRef
go back to reference Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281.CrossRef Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281.CrossRef
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMedCrossRef Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Haussmann, R. E. (1992). Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A Turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 303–310.CrossRef Haussmann, R. E. (1992). Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A Turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 303–310.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2006). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 509–523.CrossRef Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2006). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 509–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810–828.CrossRef Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810–828.CrossRef
go back to reference Laird, J. D., & Strout, S. (2007). Emotional behaviors as emotional stimuli. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 54–64). New York: Oxford University Press. Laird, J. D., & Strout, S. (2007). Emotional behaviors as emotional stimuli. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 54–64). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
go back to reference Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1270–1296.CrossRef Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1270–1296.CrossRef
go back to reference Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6–10.PubMedCrossRef Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6–10.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMedCrossRef Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371–391). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371–391). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Schwibbe, M., Röder, K., Schwibbe, G., Borchardt, M., & Geiken-Pophanken, G. (1981). Zum emotionalen Gehalt von Substantiven, Adjektiven und Verben [The emotional contents of nouns, adjectives and verbs]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 486–501. Schwibbe, M., Röder, K., Schwibbe, G., Borchardt, M., & Geiken-Pophanken, G. (1981). Zum emotionalen Gehalt von Substantiven, Adjektiven und Verben [The emotional contents of nouns, adjectives and verbs]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 486–501.
go back to reference Seibt, B., Neumann, R., Nussinson, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713–720.CrossRef Seibt, B., Neumann, R., Nussinson, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713–720.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.PubMedCrossRef Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245.PubMedCrossRef Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef
go back to reference Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
go back to reference van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1298–1306.PubMedCrossRef van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1298–1306.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes
Auteurs
Andreas B. Eder
Jochen Müsseler
Bernhard Hommel
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0327-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2012

Psychological Research 1/2012 Naar de uitgave