Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

Task conflict effect in task switching

Auteurs: Ami Braverman, Nachshon Meiran

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

A part of action preparation is deciding what the relevant task is. This task-decision process is conceptually separate from response selection. To show this, the authors manipulated task conflict in a spatial task-switching paradigm, using conflict stimuli that appeared during trials with univalent targets (affording 1 task). The conflict stimuli afforded task identity because they were used as task cues with bivalent targets (affording 2 tasks) that were intermixed with the univalent targets. Thus, for univalent targets, irrelevant stimuli either caused low task conflict or high task conflict. In three experiments, the authors found poorer performance in high task conflict trials than in low task conflict trials. Task conflict was introduced during target appearance (Experiment 1) or task preparation (Experiments 2 and 3). In the latter case, the task conflict effect decreased with increasing task preparation time showing that task preparation involves task decision.
Literatuur
go back to reference Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance, 15, 421–452. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance, 15, 421–452.
go back to reference Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602–639.CrossRefPubMed Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602–639.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Biederman, I. (1972). Human performance in contingent information processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 219–238.CrossRefPubMed Biederman, I. (1972). Human performance in contingent information processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 219–238.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brass, M., & von Cramon, D. (2004). Selection for cognitive control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8847.CrossRefPubMed Brass, M., & von Cramon, D. (2004). Selection for cognitive control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8847.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468–483.CrossRefPubMed Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468–483.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Cue–task associations in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 762–769.CrossRefPubMed Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Cue–task associations in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 762–769.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gilbert, S., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297–337.CrossRefPubMed Gilbert, S., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297–337.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1170–1176.CrossRefPubMed Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1170–1176.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gotler, A., Meiran, N., & Tzelgov, J. (2003). Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 890–896. Gotler, A., Meiran, N., & Tzelgov, J. (2003). Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 890–896.
go back to reference Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 934–946.CrossRefPubMed Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 934–946.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 967–983.CrossRefPubMed Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 967–983.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89.
go back to reference Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task-sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1474–1486.CrossRefPubMed Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task-sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1474–1486.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility––A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility––A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.CrossRef Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.CrossRef Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.CrossRef
go back to reference Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377–400). Cambridge: MIT Press. Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377–400). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Meiran, N. (2008). The dual implication of dual affordance: Stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation. Experimental Psychology, 55, 251–259.PubMed Meiran, N. (2008). The dual implication of dual affordance: Stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation. Experimental Psychology, 55, 251–259.PubMed
go back to reference Meiran, N. (2010). Task switching: Mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self control. In R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, & Y. Trope (Eds.) Social cognition and social neuroscience. NY: Oxford University Press (in press). Meiran, N. (2010). Task switching: Mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self control. In R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, & Y. Trope (Eds.) Social cognition and social neuroscience. NY: Oxford University Press (in press).
go back to reference Meiran, N., & Daichman, A. (2005). Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1272–1288. Meiran, N., & Daichman, A. (2005). Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1272–1288.
go back to reference Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137–157.CrossRefPubMed Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137–157.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Meiran, N., Kessler, Y., & Adi-Japha, E. (2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473–500.CrossRefPubMed Meiran, N., Kessler, Y., & Adi-Japha, E. (2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473–500.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Monsell, S., Taylor, T., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137–151. Monsell, S., Taylor, T., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137–151.
go back to reference Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
go back to reference Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1033–1046.CrossRefPubMed Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1033–1046.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477–1491.CrossRefPubMed Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477–1491.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.CrossRefPubMed Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404–1419.CrossRefPubMed Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404–1419.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343–367.CrossRef Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343–367.CrossRef
go back to reference Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92–105.CrossRefPubMed Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92–105.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sohn, M. H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764–778.CrossRef Sohn, M. H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764–778.CrossRef
go back to reference Sohn, M. H., & Carlson, R. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1445–1460.CrossRefPubMed Sohn, M. H., & Carlson, R. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1445–1460.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679.CrossRef Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679.CrossRef
go back to reference Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1398–1412.CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1398–1412.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89–103.CrossRefPubMed Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89–103.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.CrossRef Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Task conflict effect in task switching
Auteurs
Ami Braverman
Nachshon Meiran
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2010

Psychological Research 6/2010 Naar de uitgave