Abstract
Purpose
Sensory electrical stimulation (SES)—i.e., low-intensity electrical currents below, at, or just above the sensory threshold but below the motor threshold—is mainly used to restore/improve postural balance in pathological and healthy subjects. However, the ins and outs of its application as well as the neurophysiological effects induced are not yet well known. Hence, the aim of this paper was to address the effects of SES on postural balance based on these considerations.
Method
The immediate/concurrent effects (SES applied during postural balance measurements), the acute effects (SES durably applied before measuring postural balance) and the chronic effects (SES included in training/rehabilitation programs, i.e., measurements performed before and after the programs) were analysed with a comprehensive review.
Result
SES can lead to the improvement of postural balance using any of the three applications (immediate/concurrent, acute and chronic), notably in pathological subjects. The beneficial effects of SES can take place at the peripheral (sensory receptors sensitivity), spinal (spinal motoneural excitablity) and supra-spinal (cortex reorganisation or adaptation) levels. In healthy subjects, SES appears interesting, but too few studies have been conducted with this population to report clear results. Moreover, the literature is relatively devoid of comparative studies about the characteristics of the stimulation current (e.g., location, current parameters, duration).
Conclusion
In practice, SES appears to be particularly useful to reinforce or restore the postural function in the immediate/concurrent, acute or chronic application in pathlogical populations while its effects should be confirmed in healthy sujects by future studies. Moreover, future research should focus on the different characteristics of stimulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A/P:
-
Antero-posterior
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- COP:
-
Center of foot pressure
- COPD:
-
Displacement of COP
- COPV:
-
Displacement velocity of COP
- COPS:
-
Displacement surface of COP
- EO:
-
Eyes open
- EC:
-
Eyes closed
- FAI:
-
Functional ankle instability
- GABA:
-
Gamma aminobutyric acid
- M/L:
-
Medio-lateral
- NMES:
-
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
- SES:
-
Sensory electrical stimulation
- SR:
-
Standard rehabilitation
- TA:
-
Tibialis anterior
- TS:
-
Triceps surae
References
Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Lagerquist O, Mang CS, Okuma Y, Collins DF (2011) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol 111:2409–2426
Bermejo JL, García-Massó X, Gomis M, Noé F, Huertas F, Pablos C, Paillard T (2015) The difficulty of postural tasks amplifies the effects of fatigue on postural stability. Eur J Appl Physiol 115:489–495
Chan BKS, Ng SSM, Ng GYF (2015) A home-based program of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and task-related trunk training improves trunk control in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29:70–79
Cho HY, Lee SH, In TS, Lee KJ, Song CH (2011) Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation nerve stimulation (TENS) on changes in postural balance and muscle contraction following muscle fatigue. J Phys Ther Sci 23:899–903
Cho HY, In TS, Cho KH, Song CH (2013) A single trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) improves spasticity and balance in patients with chronic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med 229:187–193
Collins DF (2007) Central contributions to contractions evoked by tetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 35:102–109
Collins JJ, Priplata AA, Gravelle DC, Niemi J, Harry J, Lipsitz LA (2003) Noise-enhanced human sensorimotor function. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 22:76–83
Collins AT, Blackburn JT, Olcott CW, Jordan JM, Yu B, Weinhold PS (2012) The assessment of postural control with stochastic resonance electrical stimulation and a neoprene knee sleeve in the osteoarthritic knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:1123–1128
Di Giulio I, Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Loram ID (2009) The proprioceptive and agonist roles of gastrocnemius, soleus and tibialis anterior muscles in maintaining human upright posture. J Physiol 587:2399–2416
Dickstein R, Laufer Y, Katz M (2006) TENS to the posterior aspect of the legs decreases postural sway during stance. Neurosci Lett 393:51–55
Filipovic A, Kleinöder H, Dörmann U, Mester J (2012) Electromyostimulation–a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes. J Strength Cond Res 26:2600–2614
Gravelle DC, Laughton CA, Dhruv NT, Katdare KD, Niemi JB, Lipsitz LA, Collins JJ (2002) Noise-enhanced balance control in older adults. NeuroReport 13:1853–1856
Hardy SG, Spalding TB, Liu H, Nick TG, Pearson RH, Hayes AV, Stokic DS (2002) The effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on spinal motor neuron excitability in people without known neuromuscular diseases: the roles of stimulus intensity and location. Phys Ther 82:354–363
Jung KS, Jung JH, In TS, Cho HY (2016) Effects of weight-shifting exercise combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on muscle activity and trunk control in patients with stroke. Occup Ther Int 23:436–443
Jung KS, In TS, Cho HY (2017) Effects of sit-to-stand training combined with transcutaneous electrical stimulation on spasticity, muscle strength and balance ability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled study. Gait Posture 54:183–187
Kaelin-Lang A, Luft AR, Sawaki L, Burstein AH, Sohn YH, Cohen LG (2002) Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol 540:623–633
Kang MK, Nam BR, Lee YS, Cheon SH (2013) Relationship between the application of TENS to the lower limbs and balance of healthy subjects. J Phys Ther Sci 25:1079–1781
Kimura T, Kouzaki M (2013) Electrical noise to a knee joint stabilizes quiet bipedal stance. Gait Posture 37:634–636
Kwong PWH, Ng GYF, Chung RCK, Ng SSM (2018) Bilateral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves lower-limb motor function in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007341
Laufer Y, Dickstein R (2007) TENS to the lateral aspect of the knees during stance attenuates postural sway in young adults. Sci World J 7:1904–1911
Magalhães FH, Kohn AF (2012) Imperceptible electrical noise attenuates isometric plantar flexion force fluctuations with correlated reductions in postural sway. Exp Brain Res 217:175–186
Magalhães FH, Kohn AF (2014) Effectiveness of electrical noise in reducing postural sway: a comparison between imperceptible stimulation applied to the anterior and to the posterior leg muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 114:1129–1141
Maitre J, Gasnier Y, Bru N, Jully JL, Paillard T (2013) Discrepancy in the involution of the different neural loops with age. Eur J Appl Physiol 113:1821–1831
McKay D, Brooker R, Giacomin P, Ridding M, Miles T (2002) Time course of induction of increased human motor cortex excitability by nerve stimulation. NeuroReport 13:1271–1273
Ng SS, Lai CW, Tang MW, Woo J (2016) Cutaneous electrical stimulation to improve balance performance in patients with sub-acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J 22(Suppl 2):33–36
Paillard T (2012) Effects of general and local fatigue on postural control: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:162–176
Paillard T (2017) Plasticity of the postural function to sport and/or motor experience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 72:129–152
Paillard T (2018) Muscle plasticity of aged subjects in response to electrical stimulation training and inversion and/or limitation of the sarcopenic process. Ageing Res Rev 46:1–13
Paillard T (2019) Relationship between sport expertise and postural skills. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01428
Paillard T (2020) Acute and chronic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and postural balance: a review. Eur J Appl Physiol 120:1475–1488
Paillard T, Noe F (2015) Techniques and methods for testing the postural function in healthy and pathological subjects. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/891390
Paillard T, Zeronian S, Noe F (2021) The optimal exploitation of sensory electrical stimulation for regulating postural balance depends on participants’ intrinsic balance abilities. J Clin Neurosci
Park J, Seo D, Choi W, Lee S (2014) The effects of exercise with TENS on spasticity, balance, and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit 20:1890–1896
Pérennou DA, Leblond C, Amblard B, Micallef JP, Hérisson C, Pélissier JY (2001) Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation reduces neglect-related postural instability after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:440–448
Rojhani-Shirazi Z, Rezaeian T (2015) The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postural control in patients with chronic low back pain. J Med Life 8:19–27
Ross SE (2007) Noise-enhanced postural stability in subjects with functional ankle instability. Br J Sports Med 41:656–659
Ross SE, Arnold BL, Blackburn JT, Brown CN, Guskiewicz KM (2007) Enhanced balance associated with coordination training with stochastic resonance stimulation in subjects with functional ankle instability: an experimental trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-47
Ross SE, Linens SW, Wright CJ, Arnold BL (2013) Customized noise-stimulation intensity for bipedal stability and unipedal balance deficits associated with functional ankle instability. J Athl Train 48:463–470
Rugelj D, Vidovič M, Vauhnik R (2020) Sensory Sub- and suprathreshold TENS exhibit no immediate effect on postural steadiness in older adults with no balance impairments. Biomed Res Int 2020:2451291. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2451291 (eCollection 2020)
Saadat Z, Rojhani-Shirazi Z, Abbasi L (2017) Dose postural control improve following application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in diabetic peripheral neuropathic patients? A randomized placebo control trial. Diabetes Metab Syndr Online Supplement 11:755–757
Sadeghi-Demneh E, Tyson SF, Nester CJ, Copper G (2015) The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied tothe foot and ankle on strength, proprioception and balance: a preliminary study. Clin Res Foot Ankle 3:2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-910X.1000170
Schieppati M (1987) The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol 28:345–376
Schröder J, Truijen S, Van Criekinge T, Saeys W (2018) Peripheral somatosensory stimulation and postural recovery after stroke—a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil 25:312–320
Severini G, Delahunt E (2018) Effect of noise stimulation below and above sensory threshold on postural sway during a mildly challenging balance task. Gait Posture 63:27–32
Sharma T, Peters RM, Bent LR (2020) Subthreshold electrical noise applied to the plantar foot enhances lower-limb cutaneous reflex generation. Front Hum Neurosci 26(14):351
Tinazzi M, Zarattini S, Valeriani M, Romito S, Farina S, Moretto G, Smania N, Fiaschi A, Abbruzzese G (2005) Long-lasting modulation of human motor cortex following prolonged transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of forearm muscles: evidence of reciprocal inhibition and facilitation. Exp Brain Res 161:457–464
Toledo DR, Barela JA, Kohn AF (2017) Improved proprioceptive function by application of subsensory electrical noise: effects of aging and task-demand. Neuroscience 358:103–114
Tyson SF, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Nester CJ (2013) The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on strength, proprioception, balance and mobility in people with stroke: a randomized controlled cross-over trial. Clin Rehabil 27:785–791
Vanderthommen M, Duchateau J (2007) Electrical stimulation as a modality to improve performance of the neuromuscular system. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 35:180–185
Veldman MP, Maffiuletti NA, Hallett M, Zijdewind I, Hortobágyi T (2014) Direct and crossed effects of somatosensory stimulation on neuronal excitability and motor performance in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 47:22–35
Veldman MP, Zijdewind I, Maffiuletti NA, Hortobágyi T (2016) Motor skill acquisition and retention after somatosensory electrical stimulation in healthy humans. Front Hum Neurosci 10:115
Veldman MP, Maurits NM, Zijdewind I, Maffiuletti NA, van Middelkoop S, Mizelle JC, Hortobágyi T (2018) Somatosensory electrical stimulation improves skill acquisition, consolidation, and transfer by increasing sensorimotor activity and connectivity. J Neurophysiol 120:281–290
Yen HC, Chen WS, Jeng JS, Luh JJ, Lee YY, Pan GS (2019) Standard early rehabilitation and lower limb transcutaneous nerve or neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil 33:1344–1354
Yoshida T, Tanino Y, Suzuki T (2015) Effect of exercise therapy combining electrical therapy and balance training on functional instability resulting from ankle sprain-focus on stability of jump landing. J Phys Ther Sci 27:3069–3071
Yu JH, Lee SY, Kim H, Seo DK, Hong JH, Lee DY (2014) The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postural sway on fatigued dorsi-plantar flexor. Technol Health Care 22:395–402
Zarkou A, Lee SCK, Prosser LA, Hwang S, Jeka J (2018) Stochastic resonance stimulation improves balance in children with cerebral palsy: a case control study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 15:115
Zeronian S, Noe F, Paillard T (2021) Effect of the application of somatosensory and excitomotor electrical stimulation during quiet upright standing balance. Med Eng Phys 87:82–86
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Thierry Paillard (TP), I am the sole author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Michael Lindinger .
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paillard, T. Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review. Eur J Appl Physiol 121, 3261–3281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04767-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04767-5