Abstract
Objectives
To investigate whether acoustical refurbishment of classrooms for elementary and lower secondary grade pupils affected teachers’ perceived noise exposure during teaching and noise-related health symptoms.
Methods
Two schools (A and B) with a total of 102 teachers were subjected to an acoustical intervention. Accordingly, 36 classrooms (20 and 16 in school A and school B, respectively) were acoustically refurbished and 31 classrooms (16 and 15 in school A and school B, respectively) were not changed. Thirteen classrooms in school A were interim “sham” refurbished. Control measurements of RT and activity sound levels were measured before and after refurbishment. Data on perceived noise exposure, disturbance attributed to different noise sources, voice symptoms, and fatigue after work were collected over a year in a total of six consecutive questionnaires.
Results
Refurbished classrooms were associated with lower perceived noise exposure and lower ratings of disturbance attributed to noise from equipment in the class compared with unrefurbished classrooms. No associations between the classroom refurbishment and health symptoms were observed. Before acoustical refurbishment, the mean classroom reverberation time was 0.68 (school A) and 0.57 (school B) and 0.55 s in sham refurbished classrooms. After refurbishment, the RT was approximately 0.4 s in both schools. Activity sound level measurements confirmed that the intervention had reduced the equivalent sound levels during lessons with circa 2 dB(A) in both schools.
Conclusion
The acoustical refurbishment was associated with a reduction in classroom reverberation time and activity sound levels in both schools. The acoustical refurbishment was associated with a reduction in the teachers’ perceived noise exposure, and reports of disturbance from equipment in the classroom decreased. There was no significant effect of the refurbishment on the teachers’ voice symptoms or fatigue after work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åhsberg E (2000) Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations. Scand J Psychol 41:231–241
Åhsberg E, Gamberale F, Gustafsson K (1998) Upplevd trötthet efter mentalt arbete: En experimentell utvärdering av ett mätinstrument, Arbete och Hälsa 8, pp 1–25
Banbury SP, Macken WJ, Tremblay S, Jones DM (2001) Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications. Hum Factors 43:12–29
Bronkhurst AW (2000) The cocktail party phenomenon: a review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker situations. Acta Acust 86:117–128
Dockrell JE, Shield BM (2006) Acoustical barriers in classrooms: the impact of noise on performance in the classroom. Br Educ Res J 32:509–525
Erhvervs- og Byggestyrelsen (2010) Bygningsreglementet: BR10 (Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority: Building regulations 2010). Erhvervs- og Byggestyrelsen, pp 1–161
Flexer C (2004) The impact of classroom acoustics: listening, learning, and literacy. Semin Hear 25:131–140
Hughes RW, Jones DM (2003) Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. Noise Health 6:63–76
International Organization for Standardization (2008) Acoustics: measurement of room acoustic parameters: Part 2: reverberation time in ordinary rooms. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
Kjellberg A (2004) Effects of reverberation time on the cognitive load in speech communication: theoretical considerations. Noise Health 7:11–21
Kjellberg A, Landstrom U, Tesarz M, Soderberg L, Åkerlund E (1996) The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. J Environ Psychol 16:123–136
Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Nielsen PM, Persson R, Shibuya H (2011) Determinants of noise annoyance in teachers from schools with different reverberation times. J Environ Psychol 31:383–392
Kristiansen J, Persson R, Lund SP, Shibuya H, Nielsen PM (2013) Effects of classroom acoustics and self-reported noise exposure on teachers’ well-being. Environ Behav 45:283–300
Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Persson R, Shibuya H, Nielsen PM, Scholz M (2014) A study of classroom acoustics and school teachers’ noise exposure, voice load and speaking time during teaching, and the effects on vocal and mental fatigue development. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:851–860
Ljung R, Kjellberg A (2009) Long reverberation time decreases recall of spoken information. Build Acoust 16:301–312
Ljung R, Sörqvist P, Kjellberg A, Green A (2009) Poor listening conditions impair memory for intelligible lectures: implications for acoustic classroom standards. Build Acoust 16:257–265
Mickey RM, Greenland S (1989) The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129:125–137
Nijs L, Saher K, den Ouden D (2008) Effects of room absorption on human vocal output in multitalker situations. J Acoust Soc Am 123:803–813
Oberdörster M, Tiesler G (2006) Acoustic ergonomics of school. Fb 1071 ed. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden, pp 1–186
Oberdörster M, Tiesler G (2008) “Modern teaching” needs modern conditions—communication behaviour of pupils and teachers in highly absorbent classrooms. Build Acoust 15:315–324
Pelegrin-Garcia D, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Rydell R, Brunskog J, Löfqvist A (2010) Influence of classroom acoustics on the voice levels of the teacher with and without voice problems: a field study. Proc Meet Acoust 11:1–9
Persson R, Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Shibuya H, Nielsen PM (2013) Classroom acoustics and hearing ability as determinants for perceived social climate and intentions to stay at work. Noise Health 15:446–467
Sandrock S, Schütte M, Griefahn B (2009) Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:779–785
Sato H, Bradley JS (2004) Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in active elementary school classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 18th international congress on acoustics II, pp 1187–1190
Shield BM, Dockrell JE (2003) The effects of noise on children at school: a review. Build Acoust 10:97–106
Shield B, Dockrell JE (2004) External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools. J Acoust Soc Am 115:730–738
Shield BM, Dockrell JE (2008) The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. J Acoust Soc Am 123:133–144
Tiesler G, Oberdörster M (2008) Noise—a stressor? Acoustic ergonomics of schools. Build Acoust 15:249–262
Whitlock J, Dodd G (2006) Classroom acoustics—controlling the cafe effect… is the Lombard effect the key?. In: Proceedings of Acoustics 2006: Noise of Progress. Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 423–426
Yang W, Bradley JS (2009) Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. J Acoust Soc Am 125:922–933
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by The Danish Working Environment Research Fund (33-2011-03). We are also grateful to the city of Aarhus for support to the project. Last, but not least, we would like to thank the participated teachers for all their help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristiansen, J., Lund, S.P., Persson, R. et al. The effects of acoustical refurbishment of classrooms on teachers’ perceived noise exposure and noise-related health symptoms. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 89, 341–350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1077-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1077-3