Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical issues of genetic susceptibility testing for occupational diseases: opinions of trainees in a high-risk job

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Genetic research has opened up possibilities for identification of persons with an increased susceptibility for occupational disease. However, regulations considering the ethical issues that are inevitably associated with the use of genetic tests for susceptibility for occupational diseases are scarce. We investigated whether opinions of an intended stakeholder group, that is, student nurses, are sufficiently addressed by existing recommendations.

Methods

Attitudes and opinions of Dutch student nurses toward a genetic test for susceptibility to occupational contact eczema were studied in a qualitative setup using focus groups, interviews and electronic questionnaires. The results were compared with guidelines and recommendations extracted from the literature.

Results

Sixty-nine percent of the student nurses said they would partake in a genetic test for susceptibility to occupational contact eczema when available. Concerns were expressed regarding the difficulty of interpreting test results, the utility of the test result in practice and the necessity of genetic tests for non-severe diseases. For the issue of privacy and confidentiality, the students expressed few worries and much confidence. The existing guidelines largely covered the students’ opinions. Still, the data emphasized the need for good individual risk communication both before and after testing, taking into account that the test concerns susceptibility.

Conclusions

Comparing the students’ statements with the issues addressed by the guidelines, we conclude that the guidelines should pay more attention to risk communication and practical advice accompanying the test results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin JC (2010) Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice. J Genet Couns 19:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt-Rauf SI, Brandt-Rauf E, Gershon R, Brandt-Rauf PW (2011) The differing perspectives of workers and occupational medicine physicians on the ethical, legal and social issues of genetic testing in the workplace. New Solut 21:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SJ, Sandilands A, Zhao Y, Liao H, Relton CL, Meggitt SJ, Trembath RC, Barker JN, Reynolds NJ, Cordell HJ, McLean WH (2008) Prevalent and low-frequency null mutations in the filaggrin gene are associated with early-onset and persistent atopic eczema. J Invest Dermatol 128:1591–1594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (2008) TRGS 401: risks resulting from skin contact—determination, evaluation, measures

  • Casteleyn L, Van Damme K (2004) Acceptability of genetic susceptibility testing in occupational health—a position paper. Arch Public Health 62:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) ACCE model list of 44 targeted questions aimed at a comprehensive review of genetic testing. http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/ACCE/

  • Claassen L, Henneman L, De VR, Knol D, Marteau T, Timmermans D (2010) Fatalistic responses to different types of genetic risk information: exploring the role of self-malleability. Psychol Health 25:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counsil for Public Health and Healthcare [RvZ] (2008) [Screening and the role of the government] Screening en de rol van de overheid. 08/03

  • de Zwart BCH, Prins R, van der Gulden JWJ (2011) [Study on the position of occupational physicians—end report] Onderzoek naar de positie van de bedrijfsarts—Eindrapport. P10.534

  • Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (1999) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 72:496–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty SL, McBride CM, Sanderson SC, O’Neill SC, Shepperd JA, Lipkus IM (2011) Young smokers’ views of genetic susceptibility testing for lung cancer risk: minding unintended consequences. J Community Genet 2:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies [EGE] (2003) Ethical aspects of genetic testing in the workplace. 18

  • Geppert CM, Roberts LW (2005) Ethical issues in the use of genetic information in the workplace: a review of recent developments. Curr Opin Psychiatry 18:518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greisenegger E, Novak N, Maintz L, Bieber T, Zimprich F, Haubenberger D, Gleiss A, Stingl G, Kopp T, Zimprich A (2010) Analysis of four prevalent filaggrin mutations (R501X, 2282del4, R2447X and S3247X) in Austrian and German patients with atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24:607–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harel A, Abuelo D, Kazura A (2003) Adolescents and genetic testing: what do they think about it? J Adolesc Health 33:489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Northstone K, Lee SP, Liao H, Zhao Y, Pembrey M, Mukhopadhyay S, Smith GD, Palmer CN, McLean WH, Irvine AD (2008) The burden of disease associated with filaggrin mutations: a population-based, longitudinal birth cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121:872–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman NA (2003) Ethical aspects of genetic testing in the workplace. Community Genet 6:136–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungbauer FH, Piebenga WP, ten Berge EE, Hoogland RW, Posma AL, Randolfi MFC, Vorselman-Derksen CHWJ, van Woudenberg MJT, Hulshof CT, Lebbink M (2006) [Guideline contact dermatitis—prevention, treatment and counselling by the occupational physician] NVAB Richtlijn Contacteczeem - Preventie, behandeling en begeleiding door de bedrijfsarts. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Arbeids- en Bedrijfsgeneeskunde (NVAB). http://nvab.artsennet.nl/Artikel-3/Contacteczeem-1.htm

  • Keegel T, Moyle M, Dharmage S, Frowen K, Nixon R (2009) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990–2007): a systematic review. Int J Dermatol 48:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezic S, Visser MJ, Verberk MM (2009) Individual susceptibility to occupational contact dermatitis. Ind Health 47:469–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald C, Williams-Jones B (2002) Ethics and genetics: susceptibility testing in the workplace. J Bus Ethics 35:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Genetics Working Group (2009) Genetics in the workplace—implications for occupational safety and health. 2010-101

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2006) Genetic screening: a supplement to the 1993 report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics

  • O’Doherty K, Suthers GK (2007) Risky communication: pitfalls in counseling about risk, and how to avoid them. J Genet Couns 16:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer CN, Irvine AD, Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Zhao Y, Liao H, Lee SP, Goudie DR, Sandilands A, Campbell LE, Smith FJ, O’Regan GM, Watson RM, Cecil JE, Bale SJ, Compton JG, DiGiovanna JJ, Fleckman P, Lewis-Jones S, Arseculeratne G, Sergeant A, Munro CS, El HB, McElreavey K, Halkjaer LB, Bisgaard H, Mukhopadhyay S, McLean WH (2006) Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet 38:441–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhebergen MD, Visser MJ, Verberk MM, Lenderink AF, van Dijk FJ, Kezic S, Hulshof CT (2012) Revealing barriers and facilitators to use a new genetic test: comparison of three user involvement methods. J Community Genet. doi:10.1007/s12687-012-0080-6

  • Roberts LW, Geppert CM, Warner TD, Green Hammond KA, Rogers M, Smrcka J, Roberts BB (2005a) Perspectives on use and protection of genetic information in work settings: results of a preliminary study. Soc Sci Med 60:1855–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts LW, Warner TD, Geppert CM, Rogers M, Green Hammond KA (2005b) Employees’ perspectives on ethically important aspects of genetic research participation: a pilot study. Compr Psychiatry 46:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts LW, Barry LK, Warner TD (2011) Potential workplace discrimination based on genetic predisposition: views of workers. AJOB Prim Res 2:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson S, Zimmern R, Kroese M, Higgins J, Patch C, Emery J (2005) How can the evaluation of genetic tests be enhanced? Lessons learned from the ACCE framework and evaluating genetic tests in the United Kingdom. Genet Med 7:495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz LF (1993) Atopic dermatitis: a genetic-epidemiologic study in a population-based twin sample. J Am Acad Dermatol 28:719–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver K, Kukulka G, Gorniewicz J, Rayman K, Sharp R (2011) Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium: worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. Am J Ind Med 54:521–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staley K (2003) Genetic testing in the workplace—a report by genewatch UK

  • Thomsen SF, Ulrik CS, Kyvik KO, Hjelmborg JB, Skadhauge LR, Steffensen I, Backer V (2007) Importance of genetic factors in the etiology of atopic dermatitis: a twin study. Allergy Asthma Proc 28:535–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijmstra TJ, Bajema C (1990) ‘You should be that one exception’; risk perception and choice behavior in medical technology. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 134:1884–1885

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidinger S, Rodriguez E, Stahl C, Wagenpfeil S, Klopp N, Illig T, Novak N (2007) Filaggrin mutations strongly predispose to early-onset and extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 127:724–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JM, Jungner YG (1968) Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 65:281–393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the participating student nurses and the Hogeschool van Amsterdam, ROC ASA and ROC van Amsterdam for their cooperation in this study. We also thank the Foundation Institute GAK (Hilversum, the Netherlands) for funding this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kezic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, M.J., Rhebergen, M.D.F., Kezic, S. et al. Ethical issues of genetic susceptibility testing for occupational diseases: opinions of trainees in a high-risk job. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86, 827–836 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0816-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0816-y

Keywords

Navigation