Abstract
Purpose
The primary aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether working despite illness, so called “sickness presenteeism”, has an impact on the future general health of two different working populations during a follow-up period of 3 years.
Methods
The study was based on two bodies of data collected at a number of Swedish workplaces from 1999 to 2003. The first material comprised 6,901 employees from the public sector and the second 2,862 subjects from the private sector. A comprehensive survey was issued three times: at baseline, after 18 months and after 3 years. Apart from the explanatory variable sickness presenteeism, several potential confounders were considered. The outcome variable was good/excellent versus fair/poor self-reported health.
Results
Sickness presenteeism at baseline was consistently found to heighten the risk of fair/poor health at both the 18-month and 3-year follow ups even after adjusting for the detected confounders.
Conclusions
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to show that sickness presenteeism appears to be an independent risk factor for future fair/poor general health.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronsson G, Gustafsson K (2005) Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. J Occup Environ Med 47(9):958–966
Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M (2000) Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health 54(7):502–509
Aronsson G, Svensson L, Gustafsson K (2003) Unwinding, recuperation, and health among compulsory school and high school teachers in Sweden. Int J Stress Manag 10:217–234
Baum A, Posluszny DM (1999) Health psychology: mapping biobehavioral contributions to health and illness. Annu Rev Psychol 50:137–163
Bergstrom G, Bjorklund C, Fried I, Lisspers J, Nathell L, Hermansson U et al (2008) A comprehensive workplace intervention and its outcome with regard to lifestyle, health and sick leave: the AHA study. Work 31(2):167–180
Bergström G, Bodin L, Hagberg J, Aronsson G, Josephson M (2009) Sickness presenteeism today, sickness absenteeism tomorrow? A prospective study on sickness presenteeism and future sickness absenteeism. J Environ Occup Med 51 (in press)
Burell G (2002) Is it possible to change stress-related behaviour? (In Swedish). In: Leander (ed) Rushed, beleaguered—burned out? Researchers discuss strategies to cope with harmful stress. Swedish Research Council, Stockholm, pp 55–69
Caverley N, Cunningham JB, MacGregor JN (2007) Sickness presenteeism, sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. J Manag Stud 44:304–319
Dallner M, Elo A-L Gamberale F, Hottinen V, Knardahl S, Lindström K, Skogstad A, Orhede E (2000) Validation of the general nordic questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work. Nord 2000:12. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
Frank O (2000) Structural plots of multivariate binary data. J Soc Biol Struct 1:1–19
Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W (2004) Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med 46(4):398–412
Grinyer A, Singleton V (2000) Sickness absence as risk-taking behaviour: a study of organisational and cultural factors in the public sector. Health Risk Soc 2:7–21
Hemp P (2004) Presenteeism: at work—but out of it. Harv Bus Rev 82(10):49–58, 155
Johansson G, Lundberg I (2004) Adjustment latitude and attendance requirements as determinants of sickness absence or attendance. Empirical tests of the illness flexibility model. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1857–1868
Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work. Basic Books
Kivimaki M, Head J, Ferrie JE, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG (2003) Sickness absence as a global measure of health: evidence from mortality in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 327(7411):364
Kivimäki M, Head J, Ferrie JE, Hemingway H, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot M (2005) Working while ill as a risk factor for serious coronary events: The Whitehall II study. Am J Public Health 95:98–102
Kristensen Tage S (1991) Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughterhouse workers: an analysis of absence from work regarded as coping behaviour. Soc Sci Med 32:15–27
Lindberg P, Josephson M, Alfredsson L, Vingard E (2006) Promoting excellent work ability and preventing poor work ability: the same determinants? Results from the Swedish HAKuL study. Occup Environ Med 63(2):113–120
Lofland JH, Pizzi L, Frick KD (2004) A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 22(3):165–184
Main CJ, Williams AC (2002) Musculoskeletal pain. BMJ 325(7363):534–537
McEwen BS (1998) Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med 338(3):171–179
McEwen BS (2008) Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol 583(2–3):174–185
McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD (1994) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32:40–66
McKevitt C, Morgan M, Dundas R, Holland WW (1997) Sickness absence and ‘working through’ illness: a comparison of two professional groups. J Public Health Med 19(3):295–300
Munir F, Yarker J, Haslam C (2007) Sickness absence management: encouraging attendance or ‘risk-taking’ presenteeism in employees with chronic illness? Disabil Rehabil 30(19):1461–1472
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903
Prasad M, Wahlqvist P, Shikiar R, Shih YC (2004) A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity: a patient-reported outcomes perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 22(4):225–244
Rosvold EO, Bjertness E (2001) Physicians who do not take sick leave: hazardous heroes? Scand J Public Health 29(1):71–75
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, De La Fuente JR, Grant M (1993) Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 88:791–804
Schutte N, Toppinen S, Kalimo R, Schaufeli W (2000) The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) across occupational groups and nations. J Occup Organ Psychol 73:53–66
Setterlind S, Larsson G (1995) The stress profile: a psychosocial approach to measuring stress. Stress Med 11(2):85–92
Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D (2003) Lost productive work time costs from health conditions in the United States: results from the American Productivity Audit. J Occup Environ Med 45(12):1234–1246
Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr (1995) The Swedish SF-36 health survey. I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41:1349–1358
van den Heuvel SG, Ijmker S, Blatter BM, de Korte EM (2007) Loss of productivity due to neck/shoulder symptoms and hand/arm symptoms: results from the PROMO-study. J Occup Rehabil 17(3):370–382
van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A, Koes B, Laerum E, Malmivaara A (2006) European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care, Chapter 3. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S169–S191
Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F (2004) How do job characteristics, family situation, domestic work, and lifestyle factors relate to sickness absence? A study based on Sweden Post. J Occup Environ Med 46(11):1134–1143
Vroome Ernest de (2006) Prevalence of sickness absence and “presenteeism”. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/2006/07/NL0607019I.htm
Waldenstrom M, Theorell T, Ahlberg G, Josephson M, Nise P, Waldenstrom K, Vingard E (2002) Assessment of psychological and social current working conditions in epidemiological studies: experiences from the MUSIC-Norrtalje study. Scand J Public Health 30(2):94–102
Wiktorin C, Vingard E, Mortimer M, Pernold G, Wigaeus-Hjelm E, Kilbom A, Alfredsson L (1999) Interview versus questionnaire for assessing physical loads in the population-based MUSIC-Norrtalje Study. Am J Ind Med 35(5):441–455
Zou G (2004) A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 159(7):702–706
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the project groups in the HAKuL and AHA studies who have been indispensable in the completion of these studies. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of AFA-sjukförsäkring and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS), Stockholm, Sweden.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Karolinska Institute (AHA; Dnr 00-012), (HaKuL Dnr 99-242).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergström, G., Bodin, L., Hagberg, J. et al. Does sickness presenteeism have an impact on future general health?. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82, 1179–1190 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0433-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0433-6