Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We evaluate psychometric properties of a short version of the original effort–reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire. This measure is of interest in the context of assessing stressful work conditions in the era of economic globalization.

Methods

In a representative sample of 10,698 employed men and women participating in the longitudinal Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in Germany, a short version of the ERI questionnaire was included in the 2006 panel wave. Structural equation modeling and logistic regression analysis were applied.

Results

In addition to satisfactory internal consistency of scales, a model representing the theoretical structure of the scales provided the best data fit in a competitive test (RMSEA = 0.059, CAIC = 4124.19). Scoring high on the ERI scales was associated with elevated risks of poor self-rated health.

Conclusions

This short version of the ERI questionnaire reveals satisfactory psychometric properties, and can be recommended for further use in research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou ASG, Cooper CC (eds) (2005) Research companion to organizational health psychology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

  • Benach J, Mutaner C, Benavides FG, Amable M, Jodar P (2002) A new occupational health agenda for a new work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:191–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma A, Hoogland JJ (2001) The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In: Cudeck R, du Toit S, Sörbom D (eds) Structural equation models: present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Scientific Software International, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J, Marmot M (1998) Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 88:68–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling With AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright S, Cooper CC (eds) (2008) The Oxford handbook of organizational well being. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF (1996) The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1:16–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge J, van der Linden S, Schaufeli W, Peter R, Siegrist J (2008) Factorial invariance and stability of the effort–reward imbalance scales: a longitudinal analysis of two samples with different time lags. Int J Behav Med 15:62–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godin I, Kittel F (2004) Differential economic stability and psychosocial stress at work: associations with psychosomatic complaints and absenteeism. Soc Sci Med 58:1543–1553. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00345-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L-T, Bentler P (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Structural equation modeling. concepts, issues and applications. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: review of 27 community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37. doi:10.2307/2955359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joksimovic L, Starke D, von dem Knesebeck O, Siegrist J (2002) Perceived work stress, overcommitment, and self-reported musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional investigation. Int J Behav Med 9:122–138. doi:10.1207/S15327558IJBM0902_04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landsbergis PA (2003) The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: a commentary. J Occup Environ Med 45:61–71. doi:10.1097/00043764-200301000-00014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides GA, Hershberger SL (1997) Multivariate statistical methods: a first course. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutsatsos E (2008) Economic globalization and its effects on labor. In: Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E, Baker D, Landsbergis P (eds) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences and cures. Baywood Press, Amityville, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct Equ Modeling 9:599–620. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Tek L, Starke D, Siegrist J (2004) Effort–reward imbalance model and self reported health: cross sectional and perspective evidence from the causal cohort. Soc Sci Med 58:1531–1541. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00346-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurminen M (2008) Worklife expectancies of fixed-term employees in Finland 1997–2006. Scand J Work Environ Health 34:83–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrewe PL, Ganster DC (eds) (2002) Historical and current perspectives on stress and health. JAI Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rödel A, Siegrist J, Hessel A, Brähler E (2004) Psychometrische Testung des Fragebogens zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen an einer repräsentativen deutschen Stichprobe. Z Differ Diagn Psychol 25:227–238. doi:10.1024/0170-1789.25.4.227

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E, Baker D, Landsbergis P (eds) (2008) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences and cures. Baywood Press, Amityville, NY

  • Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort−reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00351-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist J, Theorell T (2006) Socioeconomic position and health. The role of work and employment. In: Siegrist J, Marmot M (eds) Social inequalities in health: new evidence and policy implications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M, von dem Knesebeck O, Jürgens H, Börsch-Supan A (2006) Quality of work, well-being, and intended early retirement of older employees–baseline results from the SHARE study. Eur J Public Health 17:62–68. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel JM, Labonte R, Ostry A (2004) Understanding “globalization” as a determinant of health determinants: a critical perspective. Int J Occup Environ Health 10:360–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfeld SA, Fuhrer R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG (1999) Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med 56:302–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starke D, Niedhammer I (2002) Gender and effort-reward imbalance at work. In: Wamala SP, Lynch J (eds) Gender and social inequities in health. Lund, Studentlitteratur

  • Tabanelli MC, Depolo M, Cooke RMT, Sarchielli G Bonfiglioli, Mattioli S, Violante FS (2008) Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1–12. doi:10.1007/s00420-008-0312-6

  • The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) http://www.diw.de/soep. Accessed 28. Oct 2008

  • Tsutsumi A, Kawakami N (2004) A review of empirical studies on the model of effort–reward imbalance at work: reducing occupational stress by implementing a new theory. Soc Sci Med 59:2335–2359. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsumi A, Nagami M, Morimoto K, Matoba T (2002) Responsiveness of measures of effort–reward imbalance questionnaire to organizational change: a validation study. J Psychosom Res 52:249–256. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00291-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsumi A, Iwata N, Wakita T, Kunagai R, Noguchi H, Kawakami N (2008) Improving the measurement accuracy of the effort–reward imbalance scales. Int J Behav Med 15:109–119. doi:10.1080/10705500801929718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Pentti J, Linna A, Virtanen M, Virtanen P, Ferrie JE (2004) Organisational downsizing, sickness absence, and mortality: 10-town prospective cohort study. BMJ 328:555. doi:10.1136/bmj.37972.496262.0D

  • van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli W (2005) Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 60:1117–1131. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner H (1992) Perturbing the organism. The biology of stressful experience. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Johannes Siegrist, Natalia Wege, Frank Pühlhofer & Morten Wahrendorf

Authors
  1. Johannes Siegrist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalia Wege
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Pühlhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Morten Wahrendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Siegrist.

Appendix

Appendix

ERI Questionnaire: short form (Table 5).

Table 5 The following items refer to your present occupation. For each of the following statements, please indicate whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree or strongly disagree. Thank you for answering all statements!
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegrist, J., Wege, N., Pühlhofer, F. et al. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82, 1005–1013 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation