Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The clinical and anatomical heterogeneity of environmental dependency phenomena

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following damage to the frontal lobes, the observation of patients presenting with environmental dependency syndrome (EDS), particularly with its two main components—grasping and imitation behavior, provides a unique opportunity to gain new insights into the neural bases of human autonomy and free-will. In the present study, thirty-nine patients with frontal lobe dysfunction [21 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 18 with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, (bvFTD)] were tested for environmental dependency phenomena and underwent neuropsychological evaluation and T1-weighted 3D brain MRI. We correlated scores obtained by assessing grasping, imitation and utilization behaviors with both neuropsychological executive test performance and grey matter density on MRI using Voxel-Based Morphometry (VBM). This study confirms the high frequency of two environmental dependency phenomena- grasping and imitation- in patients with frontal lobe syndrome (34/39 patients) and the rarity of utilization behavior (2/39). The grasping score was significantly and positively correlated with those obtained in all executive tests except the Stroop test, while the imitation score was not. In the VBM study, while the grasping score was correlated with grey matter density in the right superior frontal gyrus and both inferior temporal gyri, the imitation score was correlated with changes in the right insula, left medial frontal gyrus and left precuneus. Environmental dependency is associated with the dysfunction of a frontoparietal network. Within this large network, grasping and imitation behaviors can be dissociated from both neuropsychological and anatomical standpoints, underlining the clinical and anatomical heterogeneity of environmental dependency phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lhermitte F (1986) Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part II: patient behavior in complex and social situations: the “environmental dependency syndrome”. Ann Neurol 19:335–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg E (2009) The new executive brain: frontal lobes in a complex world. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cambier J (1999) Loss of autonomy in humans: utilization and imitation behaviour. Rev Neurol (Paris) 155:879–883

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lhermitte F, Pillon B, Serdaru M (1986) Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: imitation and utilization behavior: a neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Ann Neurol 19:326–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shallice T, Burgess P, Schon P, Baxter D (1989) The origins of utilization behaviour. Brain 112:1587–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimomura T, Mori E (1998) Obstinate imitation behaviour in differentiation of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 352:623–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh A, Dutt A (2010) Utilisation behaviour in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:154–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Renzi E, Cavalleri F, Facchini S (1996) Imitation and utilisation behaviour. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61:396–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang PN, Miller BL (2007) Clinical aspects of frontotemporal dementia. In: Miller BL, Cummings JL (eds) The human frontal lobes: functions and disorders, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 279–291

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piguet O, Hornberger M, Mioshi E, Hodges JR (2011) Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, clinical staging, and management. Lancet Neurol 10:162–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis PH, Bergeron C, McLachlan DR (1985) Atypical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol 17:337–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Donker Kaat LD, Boon AJW, Kamphorst W, Ravid R, Duivenvoorden HJ et al (2007) Frontal presentation in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 69:723–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verny M, Duyckaerts C, Agid Y, Hauw JJ (1996) The significance of cortical pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy. Clinico-pathological data in 10 cases. Brain 119:1123–1136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kertesz A, McMonagle P (2010) Behavior and cognition in corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci 289:138–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghika J, Tennis M, Growdon J, Hoffman E, Johnson K (1995) Environment-driven responses in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci 130:104–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D et al (1998) Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 51:1546–1554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH et al (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134:2456–2477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B et al (1996) Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele–Richardson–Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP International Workshop. Neurology 47:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De Renzi E, Barbieri C (1992) The incidence of the grasp reflex following hemispheric lesion and its relation to frontal damage. Brain 115:293–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubois B, Slachevski A, Litvan I, Pillon B (2000) The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55:1621–1626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Godefroy O, et Groupe de Reflexion pour l’évaluation des Fonctions EXécutives (2008) Fonctions exécutives et pathologies neurologiques et psychiatriques: évaluation en pratique clinique. Solal, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  22. O Godefroy, P Azouvi, Robert P, Roussel M, LeGall D, on behalf of the Groupe de Réflexion sur l’Evaluation des Fonctions Exécutives Study Group (2010) Dysexecutive syndrome: diagnostic criteria and validation study. Ann Neurol 68:855–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wechsler D (1981) Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised manual. Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson HE (1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12:313–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 6:643–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ashburner JT, Friston KJ (2007) Voxel-based Morphometry. In: Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, Nichols TE, Penny WD (eds) Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. Elsevier: Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 92–98

  27. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ashburner J (2005) Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: methods and applications. Curr Med Imaging Rev 1:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Leeuwen ML, van Baaren RB, Martin D, Dijksterhuis A, Bekkering H (2009) Executive functioning and imitation: increasing working memory load facilitates behavioural imitation. Neuropsychologia 47:3265–3270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Besnard J, Allain P, Aubin G, Chauviré V, Etcharry-Bouyx F et al (2011) A contribution to the study of environmental dependency phenomena: the social hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 49:3279–3294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brass M, Ruby P, Spengler S (2009) Inhibition of imitative behavior and social cognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2359–2367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brass M, Derrfuss J, von Cramon DY (2005) The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 43:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Spengler S, von Cramon DY, Brass M (2009) Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Hum Brain Mapp 30:3704–3718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McMurtray AM, Chen AK, Shapira JS, Chow TW, Mishkin F et al (2006) Variations in regional SPECT hypoperfusion and clinical features in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 66:517–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sarazin M, Pillon B, Giannakopoulos P, Rancurel G, Samson Y et al (1998) Clinicometabolic dissociation of cognitive functions and social behavior in frontal lobe lesions. Neurology 51:142–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hashimoto R, Tanaka Y (1998) Contribution of the supplementary motor area and anterior cingulate gyrus to pathological grasping phenomena. Eur Neurol 40:151–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Iacoboni M (2005) Neural mechanisms of imitation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M, Cattaneo L (2009) Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 5:24–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baier B, Karnath HO (2008) Tight link between our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Stroke 39:486–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Karnath HO, Baier B (2010) Right insula for our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Brain Struct Funct 214:411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Karnath HO, Baier B, Nägele T (2005) Awareness of the functioning of one’s own limbs mediated by the insular cortex. J Neurosci 25:7134–7138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gusnard DA, Akbudak E, Shulman GL, Raichle ME (2001) Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4259–4264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Northoff G, Bermpohl F (2004) Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends Cogn Sci 8:102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. D’Argembeau A, Ruby P, Collette F, Degueldre C, Balteau E et al (2007) Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking. J Cogn Neurosci 19:935–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Decety J (2010) The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Dev Neurosci 32:257–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Northoff G, Heinzel A, de Greck M, Bermpohl F, Dobrowolny H et al (2006) Self-referential processing in our brain-a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. Neuroimage 31:440–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR (2006) The Precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129:564–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bien N, Roebroeck A, Goebel R, Sack AT (2009) The brain’s intention to imitate: the neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation. Cereb Cortex 19:2338–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brass M, Zysset S, von Cramon DY (2001) The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. Neuroimage 14:1416–1423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA (1999) Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8301–8306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Uddin LQ, Iacoboni M, Lange C, Keenan JP (2007) The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons. Trends Cogn Sci 11:153–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Journées de Neurologie de Langue Française (to JL), and the Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM).

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Levy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lagarde, J., Valabrègue, R., Corvol, JC. et al. The clinical and anatomical heterogeneity of environmental dependency phenomena. J Neurol 260, 2262–2270 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6976-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6976-1

Keywords

Navigation