Skip to main content
Log in

Validation and cultural modification of Arabic voice handicap index

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The voice handicap index (VHI) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring a patient’s self-assessment of voice severity. In some ways, it reflects the patient’s quality of life. Although it has been recognized and widely applied to populations in European countries and to English speaking populations, it has not been used in its present forms in the Arabic speaking countries due to the specific language constraints of Euro-American terminology. The purposes of this study were to generate an Arabic version of VHI, to assess its reliability, and to apply it to a wide variety of normal and dysphonic individuals of Arabic descent. The Arabic version of VHI was derived in the standard way for test translation. The translated version was then administered to 65 patients with voice disorders and 65 control subjects. Participants’ responses were statistically analyzed to assess the validity, and to compare the pathological group with the control group. The Arabic VHI showed a significant high internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.97 and r = 0.89, respectively), high item-domain and domain-total correlation (r = 0.73–0.94). There was a statistically significant difference between the control and the voice-disordered groups (P < 0.001). The results of this study demonstrated strong internal consistency of the Arabic VHI. Thus, the Arabic version of VHI is considered to be a valid and reliable self-assessment tool for the severity of voice disorders in Arabic language speaking patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woo P (1996) Quantification of videostrobolaryngoscopic findings—measurements of the normal glottal cycle. Laryngoscope 106:1–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benninger MS, Ahuja AS, Gardner G et al (1998) Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice 12:540–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobson BHJA, Grywalsky C et al (1997) The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 6:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (1980) International Classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 25–43

  5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2002) Criteria for determining disability in speech-language disorders. Evidence report/technology assessment

  6. Nawka T, Wiesmann U, Gonnermann U (2003) Validation of the German version of the voice handicap index. HNO 51:921–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lam PK, Chan KM, Ho WK et al (2006) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope 116:1192–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guimarães I, Abberton E (2004) An investigation of the voice handicap index with speakers of Portuguese: preliminary data. J Voice 18:71–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pruszewicz A, Obrebowski A, Wiskirska-Woznica B et al (2004) Complex voice assessment—Polish version of the voice handicap index (VHI). Otolaryngol Pol 58:547–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nunez-Batalla F, Corte-Santos P, Senaris-Gonzalez B et al (2007) Adaptation and validation to the Spanish of the voice handicap index (VHI-30) and its shortened version (VHI-10). Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 58:386–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakkesteegt MM, Wieringa MH, Gerritsma EJ et al (2006) Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the voice handicap index. Folia Phoniatr Logop 58:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T et al (2006) Applying the voice handicap index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic Hebrew speakers. J Voice 20:318–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Helidoni ME, Murry T, Moschandreas J et al (2010) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index into Greek. J Voice 24(2):221–227

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G (1999) Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice 13:557–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gliklich RE, Glovsky RM, Montgomery WW (1999) Validation of a voice outcome survey for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deary IJ, Webb A, Mackenzie K et al (2004) Short, self-report voice symptom scales: psychometric characteristics of the voice handicap index-10 and the vocal performance questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:232–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN et al (2003) VoiSS: a patient-derived voice symptom scale. J Psychosom Res 54:483–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J et al (2004) Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope 114:1549–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosen CA, Murry T, Zinn A et al (2000) Voice handicap index change following treatment of voice disorders. J Voice 14:619–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsiung MW, Pai L, Wang HW (2002) Correlation between voice handicap index and voice laboratory measurements in dysphonic patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259:97–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Vedrody M et al (2009) Correlation between the voice handicap index and voice measurements in four groups of patients with dysphonia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:762–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malki KH, Al-Habib SF, Hagr AA et al (2009) Acoustic analysis of normal Saudi adult voices. Saudi Med J 30:1081–1086

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nawka T, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, De Bodt M et al (2009) Item reduction of the voice handicap index based on the original version and on European translations. Folia Phoniatr Logop 61:37–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kotby M (1995) The accent method of voice therapy. Singular Publishing Group, Inc., San Diego, pp 1–21

  25. Amir O, Tavor Y, Leibovitzh T et al (2006) Evaluating the validity of the voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) among Hebrew speakers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:603–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsiung MW, Lu P, Kang BH et al (2003) Measurement and validation of the voice handicap index in voice-disordered patients in Taiwan. J Laryngol Otol 117:478–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Research Center of Medical College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It was supervised by the Research Chair of Voice and Swallowing Disorders (RCVASD), King Saud University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamer A. Mesallam.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malki, K.H., Mesallam, T.A., Farahat, M. et al. Validation and cultural modification of Arabic voice handicap index. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1743–1751 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1296-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1296-x

Keywords

Navigation