Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Content comparison of quality of life questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide a content comparison of frequently used questionnaires that assess health-related quality of life (hrQOL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. This systematic content comparison describes which specific areas of hr-QOL research are covered by each questionnaire. Thereby, it shall assist the clinician in the decision process of instrument selection depending on the content of the study question. As a reference, we chose the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF), which was adopted by the WHO in 2001. A systematic literature review identified current hrQOL questionnaires relevant for HNC. The concepts of functioning contained in each questionnaire were translated (linked”) to the ICF according to standardized guidelines. Nine questionnaires were selected for further analyses: EORTC-QLQ (C30 + HN35), FACT (G + HN), UW_QOL, QOL-RTI, HN-QOL, PSS-HN, VHI, LORQ, XQ. Within the selected questionnaires, there are 474 concepts, matching 74 second-level ICF categories. The results are presented in tables, showing for each of the validated questionnaires, which of these 74 categories of functioning are addressed. In terms of diversification of content among the questionnaires, there are just eight categories that are used rather frequently and apply to at least five (out of nine) of the questionnaires: e110 Products for personal consumption (i.e., food, drugs), b510 ingestion function, b152 emotional function, b280 sensation of pain, b310 voice, d550 eating, b130 energy and drive function and d850 employment. This ICF-based content comparison provides detailed information on the content that is covered in each questionnaire and thereby assists questionnaire selection. The results question the assumption that HNC-specific questionnaires generally cover the same content. Depending on the study question, the population to be studied and the intervention, there is no unique ideal questionnaire. Compared with other types of qualitative review, the most important advantage of content comparison based on the ICF is the use of an external and independent reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (1993) Rehabilitation after cardiovascular disease, with special emphasis on developing countries. Report of WHO expert committee, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Langenhoff B, Krabbe P, Wobbes T et al (2001) Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 88:643–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust A (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M et al (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2:1–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ringash J, Bezjak A (2001) A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 23:201–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cella D, Tulsky D, Gray G et al (1993) The functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Terrell J, Nanavati K, Esclamado R et al (1997) Head and neck cancer specific quality of life: instrument validation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:1125–1132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weymuller EJ, Alsarraf R, Yueh B et al (2001) Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Washington quality of life instrument and its modification (UW-QOL-R). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:489–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trotti A, Johnson D, Gwede C et al (1998) Development of a head and neck companion module for the quality of life-radiation therapy instrument (QOL-RTI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:803–806

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eisbruch A, Kim H, Terrell J et al (2001) Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:695–704

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization (2001) International clasification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stucki GCA, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Üstün TB (2002) Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 24:281–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Post M, de Witte L, Schrijvers A (1999) Quality of life and the ICIDH: towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research. Clin Rehabil 13:5–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jette A (1993) Using health-related quality of life measures in physical therapy outcomes research. Phys Ther 73:528–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebrahim S (1995) Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement. Soc Sci Med 41:1383–1394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers S, Ahad S, Murph A (2007) A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on “Quality of life” in head and neck cancer: 2000 to 2005. Oral Oncol

  18. Fung K, Terrell J (2004) Outcomes research in head and neck cancer. ORL 66:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmquist M et al (1999) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol 17:1008–1019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weymuller EJ, Alsarraf R, Yueh B et al (2001) Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Xashington quality of life instrument and its modification (UW-QOC-R). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:489–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassan S, Xeymuller E (1993) Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 15:485–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. List M, DÀntonio L, Cella D et al (1996) The performance status scale for head neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer therapy. Cancer 77:2294–2301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pace-Balzan A, Caxood J, Hoxell R et al (2004) The further development and validation of the liverpool oral rehabilitation questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey of patients attending for oral rehabilitation and general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil 31:609–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobson B, Johnson A, Gryxalski C et al (1997) The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. J Speech-Lang Pathol 6:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  25. Benninger M, Ahuja A, Gardner G et al (1998) Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice 12:540–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eisbruch A, Kim H, Terrell J et al (2001) Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:695–704

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mapi Research Institute—Arr. Proqulid database (Patient reported outcome and quality of life Instrument database). In: http://www.proqolidorg/proqolid/search__

  28. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T et al (2002) Linking health status measurements to the intanational classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 34:205–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al (2005) ICF Linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 37:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. List M, Bilir S (2004) Functional outcomes in head and neck cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 14:178–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chandu A, Smith A, Rogers S (2006) Health-related quality of life in oral cancer: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:495–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Browmann G, Wong G, Hodson I et al (1993) Influence of cigarette smoking on the efficacy of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 328:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tschiesner U, Cieza A, Rogers S et al (2007) Developing core sets for patients with head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(10):1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers S, Fisher S, Woolgar J (1999) A review of quality of life assessment in oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillifac Surg 28:99–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. List M, Stracks J (2000) Evaluation of quality of life in patients definitively treated for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Oncol 12:215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stucki A, Borchers M, Stucki G, et al. (2006) Content comparison of health status measures for obesity based on the international classification functioning, disability and health. Int J Obesity 30(12):1791–1799

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brockow T, Cieza A, Kuhlow H et al (2004) Identifying concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic wide spread pain using the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a reference. J Rehabil Med 44(Suppl):30–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. WHO (2007) History of the ICD. In: retrieved: March 2007 from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/index

  40. Vierkant RA (2004) A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervals about a Kappa coefficient. SAS users group international online proceedings. Retrieved 23 July 2004, from http://www.2sascom/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295PDF, 2000

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Elisabeth Linseisen for the acquisition of questionnaires and Edda Amann and Barbara Kollerits for their contribution to the linkage procedure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

    U. Tschiesner, U. Harréus & A. Berghaus

  2. Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Merseyside Head and Neck Cancer Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK

    S. N. Rogers

  3. ICF Research Branch of the WHO FIC Collaborating Center (DIMDI), IHRS, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

    A. Cieza

  4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany

    U. Tschiesner

Authors
  1. U. Tschiesner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. N. Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Harréus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Berghaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Cieza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Tschiesner.

Additional information

This project is done in cooperation with the World Health Organization. This project is funded through Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tschiesner, U., Rogers, S.N., Harréus, U. et al. Content comparison of quality of life questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265, 627–637 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0641-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0641-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation