Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Obstetrical and neonatal outcome in young adolescents of low socio-economic status: a case control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine obstetrical and neonatal outcome among early adolescent pregnancies (≤15 years).

Method

We compared obstetrical and neonatal outcome of early adolescent nulliparas with outcome of nulliparous women aged 20–30 years.

Results

Two hundred and one (201) early adolescent nulliparous patients of low socio-economic status were enrolled at the Enrique C. Sotomayor Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Guayaquil-Ecuador, and matched for gestational age with 201 low socio-economic nulliparous controls aged 20–30. Mean maternal age of the adolescent group was 14.2±0.6 years. The incidence of cervicovaginal infections during current pregnancy was significantly higher among adolescents (trichomoniasis: 11.4% vs. 5% and candidiasis: 27.8% vs. 12.4%, p<0.05). The incidence of eclampsia was higher in adolescents (2.5% vs. 0%, p<0.05). The preterm rate in each group was 4.9%. There were no differences in labor characteristics and the rate of cesarean section, labor complications and abnormal puerperium between both studied groups. Nevertheless, mean neonatal weight was lower and the incidence of low birth weight infants (<2,500 g) and adverse neonatal outcome was significantly higher in the adolescent group (2,837.6±454 g vs. 3,017±547 g; 19.9% vs. 11.4% [OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1–3.5] and 9.5% vs. 3.5% [OR=2.9, 95% CI: 1.1–7.7] respectively, p<0.05).

Conclusion

Pregnancy in young adolescents (≤15 years) of low socio-economic status did not impose adverse obstetrical outcome, however it did increase the risk for low birth weight, adverse neonatal outcome and cervicovaginal infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Heija A, Ali AM, Al-Dakheil S (2002) Obstetrics and perinatal outcome of adolescent nulliparous pregnant women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53:90–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, McCombs SL (1997) Adverse perinatal outcomes in young adolescents. J Reprod Med 42:559–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH (1976) A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:555–565

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter DM, Felice ME, Rosoff J, Zabin LS, Beilenson PL, Dannenberg AL (1994) When children have children: the teen pregnancy predicament. Am J Prev Med 10:108–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coria-Soto IL, Bobadilla JL, Notzon F (1996) The effectiveness of antenatal care in preventing intrauterine growth retardation and low birth weight due to preterm delivery. Int J Qual Health Care 8:13–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Souza CM, Shrier LA (1999) Prevention and intervention of sexually transmitted diseases in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr 11:287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Felice ME, Granados JL, Ances IG, Hebel R, Roeder LM, Heald FP (1981) The young pregnant teenager: impact of comprehensive prenatal care. J Adolesc Health 1:193–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hampton HL, Powell RH (1999) Obstetrical outcome in the very young adolescent. J Miss State Med Assoc 40:411–414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaskiewicz JA, McAnarney ER (1994) Pregnancy during adolescence. Pediatr Rev 15:32–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kessner DM, Singer J, Kalik CE, Schlesinger ER (1973) Infant death: an analysis by maternal risk and health care, chapter 2. Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Scientists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krueger PM, Scholl TO (2000) Adequacy of prenatal care and pregnancy outcome. J Am Osteopath Assoc 100:485–492

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lao TT, Ho LF (1997) The obstetric implications of teenage pregnancy. Hum Reprod 12:2303–2305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu TH, Hwang MN, Suhng LA, Chou MC, Lee MC (1999) Demographic characteristics of fathers of infants born to adolescent mothers in Taiwan. J Adolesc Health 24:446–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lubarsky SL, Schiff E, Friedman SA, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1994) Obstetric characteristics among nulliparas under age 15. Obstet Gynecol 84:365–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Munoz M (2001) Self-aware sex education: a theoretical and practical approach in Venezuela. Reprod Health Matters 9:146–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nitz K (1999) Adolescent pregnancy prevention: a review of interventions and programs. Clin Psychol Rev 19:457–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlova-Greenfield T, Sutija VG, Gudavalli M (2000) Adolescent pregnancy: positive perinatal outcome at a community hospital. J Perinat Med 28:443–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perry RL, Mannino B, Hediger ML, Scholl TO (1996) Pregnancy in early adolescence: are there obstetric risks? J Matern Fetal Med 5:333–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saito MI (1998) Sex education in school: preventing unwanted pregnancy in adolescents. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 63:S157–S160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vytiska-Binstorfer E, Skodler WD, Grunberger W (1987) [Pregnancy and labor in 12 to 14-year-old girls]. Klin Padiatr 199:48–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. Chedraui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hidalgo, L.A., Chedraui, P.A. & Chávez, M.J. Obstetrical and neonatal outcome in young adolescents of low socio-economic status: a case control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271, 207–211 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0600-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0600-7

Keywords

Navigation