Skip to main content
Log in

Fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture: a rational basis for postoperative treatment

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lacking rational basis for the postoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures.

Methods

Biomechanical test of stability of tension banding and screw fixation of fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures in cadaver specimen, sonographic measuring of the maximum cross-section of the peroneus brevis muscle, electromyographic examinations of the activity of the peroneus brevis muscle at different loads and means of immobilization.

Results

The forces acting on the base of the fifth metatarsal bone during voluntary activation of the peroneus brevis muscle or activation in the gait cycle are of the same magnitude as the failure forces of internal fixation. Immobilization of the talocrural joint achieves no reduction in muscle activation. Partial weight bearing reduces muscle activation.

Conclusions

The postoperative treatment after osteosynthesis of fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures should be partial weight bearing. For safety reasons we add an elastic ankle orthesis to prevent supination. A below-knee cast is not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dameron TB (1995) Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 3(2):110–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt RF, Thews G (1995) Physiologie des Menschen. Springer, Berlin, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dameron TB (1975) Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg. 57-A(9):788–792

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ (1993) Jones fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle 14(6):358–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thordarson DB (2000) Fractures of the midfoot and forefoot. In: Myerson MS (ed) Disorders of the foot and ankle. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1265–1296

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rockwood CA, Green DP (1975) Fractures. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1482–1483

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano AR, Fallat LM (2004) Strength analysis of intraosseus wire fixation for avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base. J Foot Surg 43(4):225–230. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2004.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moshirfar A, Campbell JT, Molloy S, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM (2003) Fifth metatarsal tuberosity fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int 24(8):630–633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heineck J, Liebscher T, Zwipp H (2001) Fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures. Orthop Traumatol 2:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt RF, Thews G (1995) Physiologie des Menschen. Springer, Berlin, p 75

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeeshan S, Husain BS, Donna J, DeFronzo DPM (2000) Relative stability of tension band versus two-cortex screw fixation for treating fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures. J Foot Surg 39(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Heineck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heineck, J., Wolz, M., Haupt, C. et al. Fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture: a rational basis for postoperative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 1089–1092 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0756-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0756-x

Keywords

Navigation