Abstract
Objectives
We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a standardized computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Background
The diagnostic performance of CTA for the detection of CAD in patients with aortic stenosis referred for TAVI has thus far not been validated.
Methods
A consecutive series of 475 patients (194 male, mean age: 82 ± 6 years) with CTA data sets obtained during the routine diagnostic work-up before TAVI were included. A total of 6,603 coronary segments in 1,899 coronary arteries ≥1.5 mm in diameter and 271 grafts were evaluated for the presence of significant CAD defined as ≥50 % luminal narrowing. Results were compared with invasive coronary angiography as the standard of reference.
Results
Prevalence of significant CAD was 57 % (270/475), and 5,925 coronary segments (90 %) and 257 bypass grafts (95 %) were evaluable by CTA. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity (Se), specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (NPV) were 98, 37, 67 and 94 %, respectively. CTA showed satisfactory ability to exclude significant CAD in the following subgroups: (1) patients (221/475) without prior known CAD (Se: 97 %, NPV: 97 %), (2) patients (13/475) without prior known CAD and absent coronary calcification (NPV: 100 %) and (3) bypass grafts (Se: 97 %, NPV: 99 %).
Conclusions
Comprehensive evaluation of a pre-TAVI CTA could prove to be a useful rule-out test for significant CAD in selected subgroups of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Haussig S, Schuler G, Linke A (2014) Worldwide TAVI registries: what have we learned? Clin Res Cardiol 103(8):603–612. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0698-y
O’Sullivan CJ, Stortecky S, Buellesfeld L, Wenaweser P, Windecker S (2014) Preinterventional screening of the TAVI patient: how to choose the suitable patient and the best procedure. Clin Res Cardiol 103(4):259–274. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0676-4
Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(6):366–380. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.002
Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M et al (2012) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without concomitant coronary artery disease: comparison of characteristics and early outcome in the German multicenter TAVI registry. Clin Res Cardiol 101(12):973–981. doi:10.1007/s00392-012-0486-5
Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161(6):1106–1113. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.003
Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA (2003) The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 24(9):881–882
Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(2):122–136. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.01.001
Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A (2009) Assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 103(5):667–673. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.040
Kepka C, Opolski M, Kruk M et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting. Postep Kardiol Inter 3(29):183–192. doi:10.5114/pwki.2012.30396
Weustink AC, Nieman K, Pugliese F et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(7):816–824. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.010
Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29(6):766–776. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn044
Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 114(22):2334–2341
Bell RM, Rear R, Cunningham J, Dawnay A, Yellon DM (2014) Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography (ERICCIN): rationale and study design of a randomised single-centre, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin Res Cardiol 103(3):203–209. doi:10.1007/s00392-013-0637-3
Seiffert M, Sinning JM, Meyer A et al (2014) Development of a risk score for outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 103(8):631–640. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0692-4
Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al (2006) Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(10):2020–2024
Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2006) Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(8):1658–1665
Stagnaro N, Della Latta D, Chiappino D (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients referred for heart valve surgery. Radiol Med 114(5):728–742. doi:10.1007/s11547-009-0403-9
Larsen LH, Kofoed KF, Dalsgaard M et al (2013) Assessment of coronary artery disease using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with aortic valve stenosis referred for surgical aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiol 168(1):126–131. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.057
Vanhecke TE, Madder RD, Weber JE, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Chinnaiyan KM (2011) Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(5):490–497. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964205
Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L et al (2007) Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 99(11):1529–1534
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):552–557
Husmann L, Leschka S, Boehm T et al (2006) Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography. Rofo 178(10):1007–1013
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16(12):2739–2747
Acknowledgments
We thank Elizabeth Martinson, Ph.D., for her help in editing this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
M. P. Opolski and W.-K. Kim contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Opolski, M.P., Kim, WK., Liebetrau, C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 104, 471–480 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0806-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0806-z