Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a standardized computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Background

The diagnostic performance of CTA for the detection of CAD in patients with aortic stenosis referred for TAVI has thus far not been validated.

Methods

A consecutive series of 475 patients (194 male, mean age: 82 ± 6 years) with CTA data sets obtained during the routine diagnostic work-up before TAVI were included. A total of 6,603 coronary segments in 1,899 coronary arteries ≥1.5 mm in diameter and 271 grafts were evaluated for the presence of significant CAD defined as ≥50 % luminal narrowing. Results were compared with invasive coronary angiography as the standard of reference.

Results

Prevalence of significant CAD was 57 % (270/475), and 5,925 coronary segments (90 %) and 257 bypass grafts (95 %) were evaluable by CTA. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity (Se), specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (NPV) were 98, 37, 67 and 94 %, respectively. CTA showed satisfactory ability to exclude significant CAD in the following subgroups: (1) patients (221/475) without prior known CAD (Se: 97 %, NPV: 97 %), (2) patients (13/475) without prior known CAD and absent coronary calcification (NPV: 100 %) and (3) bypass grafts (Se: 97 %, NPV: 99 %).

Conclusions

Comprehensive evaluation of a pre-TAVI CTA could prove to be a useful rule-out test for significant CAD in selected subgroups of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haussig S, Schuler G, Linke A (2014) Worldwide TAVI registries: what have we learned? Clin Res Cardiol 103(8):603–612. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0698-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Sullivan CJ, Stortecky S, Buellesfeld L, Wenaweser P, Windecker S (2014) Preinterventional screening of the TAVI patient: how to choose the suitable patient and the best procedure. Clin Res Cardiol 103(4):259–274. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0676-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(6):366–380. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M et al (2012) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without concomitant coronary artery disease: comparison of characteristics and early outcome in the German multicenter TAVI registry. Clin Res Cardiol 101(12):973–981. doi:10.1007/s00392-012-0486-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161(6):1106–1113. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA (2003) The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 24(9):881–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(2):122–136. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A (2009) Assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 103(5):667–673. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kepka C, Opolski M, Kruk M et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting. Postep Kardiol Inter 3(29):183–192. doi:10.5114/pwki.2012.30396

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weustink AC, Nieman K, Pugliese F et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(7):816–824. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29(6):766–776. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 114(22):2334–2341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bell RM, Rear R, Cunningham J, Dawnay A, Yellon DM (2014) Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography (ERICCIN): rationale and study design of a randomised single-centre, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin Res Cardiol 103(3):203–209. doi:10.1007/s00392-013-0637-3

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seiffert M, Sinning JM, Meyer A et al (2014) Development of a risk score for outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 103(8):631–640. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0692-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al (2006) Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(10):2020–2024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2006) Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(8):1658–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stagnaro N, Della Latta D, Chiappino D (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients referred for heart valve surgery. Radiol Med 114(5):728–742. doi:10.1007/s11547-009-0403-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larsen LH, Kofoed KF, Dalsgaard M et al (2013) Assessment of coronary artery disease using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with aortic valve stenosis referred for surgical aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiol 168(1):126–131. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanhecke TE, Madder RD, Weber JE, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Chinnaiyan KM (2011) Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(5):490–497. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L et al (2007) Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 99(11):1529–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Husmann L, Leschka S, Boehm T et al (2006) Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography. Rofo 178(10):1007–1013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16(12):2739–2747

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Elizabeth Martinson, Ph.D., for her help in editing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helge Möllmann.

Additional information

M. P. Opolski and W.-K. Kim contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Opolski, M.P., Kim, WK., Liebetrau, C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 104, 471–480 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0806-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0806-z

Keywords

Navigation