Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transradial access for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography gains more and more popularity because of its advantages over the femoral approach, enhancing patient comfort, reducing bleeding complications and duration of hospital stay. However, these benefits are overshadowed by an increased rate of radial artery (RA) occlusion. There are little data regarding the exact incidence, potential predictors and outcome of post-procedural RA occlusions. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence for the optimal treatment of this complication.

Methods

In a single-centre prospective observational study, 488 consecutive patients were evaluated by ultrasound the day after transradial cardiac catheterization for signs of RA occlusion. Symptomatic patients with sonographically identified radial artery thrombosis underwent treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for 4 weeks. Asymptomatic patients did not receive anticoagulation therapy. The primary endpoint was the patency rate of the radial artery at 4 weeks of follow-up.

Results

Radial artery thrombosis was found in 51 of 488 (10.5%) patients 1 day after transradial cardiac catheterization. 30 (58.8%) patients showed symptoms on access site, whereas 21 (41.2%) did not show any symptoms. After 4 weeks, 26 (86.7%) of the symptomatic patients showed a partial or complete recanalization of the radial artery after treatment with LMWH, compared with 4 (19.1%) of the asymptomatic patients without anticoagulation (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Radial artery thrombosis is a frequent complication after transradial coronary angiography. Incidence of RA occlusion is underestimated due to the often asymptomatic clinical course. Treatment of symptomatic RA occlusion with low-molecular-weight heparins significantly increases patency rates after 4 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campeau L (1989) Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 16(1):3–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ (1993) Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 30(2):173–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindstaedt M et al (2009) Adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for myocardial fractional flow reserve measurements: comparison of administration by femoral venous versus antecubital venous access. Clin Res Cardiol 98(11):717–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agostoni P et al (2004) Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(2):349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cruden NL et al (2007) Reduced vascular complications and length of stay with transradial rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70(5):670–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper CJ et al (1999) Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 138(3 Pt 1):430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen E (1929) Thromboangiitis obliterans: methods of diagnosis of chronic occlusive arterial lesions distal to the wrist with illustrative cases. Am J Med Sci 178:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stella PR et al (1997) Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 40(2):156–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C (1983) On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 59(1):42–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahm JB et al (2002) A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(2):172–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu SS et al (2000) 8 French transradial coronary interventions: clinical outcome and late effects on the radial artery and hand function. J Invasive Cardiol 12(12):605–609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito S et al (1999) Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46(2):173–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakai H et al (2001) Limitations of successive transradial approach in the same arm: the Japanese experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 54(2):204–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lefrevre T, Thebault B, Spaulding C et al (1995) Radial approach patency after percutaneous left radial artery approach for coronary angiography. The role of heparin. Eur Heart J 16:293

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rathore S, Morris JL (2008) The radial approach: is this the route to take? J Interv Cardiol 21(5):375–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamm CW et al (2008) Diagnostic heart catheterization. Clin Res Cardiol 97(8):475–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mann T et al (1998) Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 32(3):572–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bedford RF (1978) Long-term radial artery cannulation: effects on subsequent vessel function. Crit Care Med 6(1):64–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi EY et al (2005) Hemostatic efficacy of hydrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 17(9):459–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiner B, Fischer T, Waxman S (2003) Hemostasis in the era of the chronic anticoagulated patient. J Invasive Cardiol 15(11):669–673 quiz 674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanmartin M et al (2007) Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70(2):185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Geschwind JF et al (2003) Thrombolytic therapy in the setting of arterial line-induced ischemia. J Endovasc Ther 10(3):590–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hildick-Smith DJ et al (1998) Coronary angiography from the radial artery—experience, complications and limitations. Int J Cardiol 64(3):231–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruiz-Salmeron RJ et al (2005) Assessment of the efficacy of phentolamine to prevent radial artery spasm during cardiac catheterization procedures: a randomized study comparing phentolamine vs. verapamil. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 66(2):192–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. He GW (1998) Verapamil plus nitroglycerin solution maximally preserves endothelial function of the radial artery: comparison with papaverine solution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115(6):1321–1327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Clinic III, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    A. R. Zankl, M. Andrassy, C. Volz, B. Ivandic, U. Krumsdorf, H. A. Katus & E. Blessing

Authors
  1. A. R. Zankl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Andrassy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Volz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Ivandic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. U. Krumsdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. A. Katus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. E. Blessing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Zankl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zankl, A.R., Andrassy, M., Volz, C. et al. Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins. Clin Res Cardiol 99, 841–847 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0197-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0197-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation