Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe

Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

A registry mandated by the European Society of Cardiology collects data on trends in interventional cardiology within Europe. Special interest focuses on relative increases and ratios in new techniques and their distributions across Europe. We report the data through 2004 and give an overview of the development of coronary interventions since the first data collection in 1992.

Methods and results

Questionnaires were distributed yearly to delegates of all national societies of cardiology represented in the European Society of Cardiology. The goal was to collect the case numbers of all local institutions and operators. The overall numbers of coronary angiographies increased from 1992 to 2004 from 684 000 to 2 238 000 (from 1250 to 3930 per million inhabitants). The respective numbers for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and coronary stenting procedures increased from 184 000 to 885 000 (from 335 to 1550) and from 3000 to 770 000 (from 5 to 1350), respectively. Germany was the most active country with 712 000 angiographies (8600), 249 000 angioplasties (3000), and 200 000 stenting procedures (2400) in 2004. The indication has shifted towards acute coronary syndromes, as demonstrated by rising rates of interventions for acute myocardial infarction over the last decade. The procedures are more readily performed and perceived safer, as shown by increasing rate of "ad hoc" PCIs and decreasing need for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In 2004, the use of drug-eluting stents continued to rise. However, an enormous variability is reported with the highest rate in Switzerland (70%). If the rate of progression remains constant until 2010 the projected number of coronary angiographies will be over three million, and the number of PCIs about 1.5 million with a stenting rate of almost 100%.

Conclusion

Interventional cardiology in Europe is ever expanding. New coronary revascularization procedures, alternative or complementary to balloon angioplasty, have come and gone. Only stenting has stood the test of time and matured to the default technique. Facilitated access to PCI, more complete and earlier detection of coronary artery disease promise continued growth of the procedure despite the uncontested success of prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG, Hewitt K, Krone RJ, Block PC, McKay CR, Weintraub WS (2002) A contemporary overview of percutaneous coronary interventions. The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACCNCDR). J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1096–11103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balmer F, Rotter M, Togni M, Pfiffner D, Zeiher AM, Maier W, Meier B (2005) Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 2000. Int J Cardiol 101:457–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook S, Togni M, Walpoth N, Maier W, Mühlberger V et al (2006) Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992–2003. EuroIntervention 1:374–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudek D, Zmudka K, Kaluza GL, Kuta M, Pieniazek P, Przewlocki T, Zorkun C, Legutko J, Gajos G, Bartus S, Bryniarski L, Dziewierz A, Pasowicz M, Dubiel JS (2003) Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction transferred from remote hospitals. Am J Cardiol 91:227–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh P, Schistek R, Unger F (2004) Coronary revascularization in DACH: 1991–2002. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52:356–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laskey WK, Kimmel S, Krone RJ (2000) Contemporary trends in coronary intervention: a report from the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 49:19–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MacCay J, Mensah GA (2004) Part six: World Tables. In: The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. WHO ISBN 92-4-156276 5:84–91

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maier W, Abay M, Cook S, Togni M, Zeiher A, Meier B (2006) The 2002 European registry of cardiac catheter interventions. Int J Cardiol 113:299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maier W, Windecker S, Boersma E, Meier B (2001) Evolution of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in Europe from 1992–1996. Eur Heart J 22:1733–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maier W, Windecker S, Lablanche JM, Mühlberger V, Wijns W, Meier B (2001) The European registry of cardiac catheter interventions 1996. Eur Heart J 22:373–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer BJ, Meier B, Bonzel T, Fabian J, Heyndrickx G, Morice MC, Mühlberger V, Piscione F, Rothman M, Wijns W, van den Brand M (1996) Interventional cardiology in Europe 1993. Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 17:1318–1328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rothlisberger C, Meier B (1995) Coronary interventions in Europe 1992. The Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 16:922–1029

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotter M, Pfiffner D, Maier W, Zeiher AM, Meier B (2003) Interventional cardiology in Europe 1999. Eur Heart J 24:1164–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruygrok PN, Ormiston JA, O'Shaughnessy B (2000) Coronary angioplasty in New Zealand 1995–1998: a report from the National Coronary Angioplasty Registry. N Z Med J 113:381–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Togni M, Balmer F, Pfiffner D, Maier W, Zeiher AM, Meier B (2004) Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992–2001. Eur Heart J 25:1208–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, Bednar F, Suryapranata H (2000) Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J 21:823–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T, Heyndrickx G, Lablanche JM, Morice MC, Mühlberger V, Neuhaus KL, Piscione F, van den Brand M, Wijns W, Meier B (1999) Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995. Working Group Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 20:484–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Windecker S, Meyer BJ, Bonzel T, Fabian J, Heyndrickx G, Morice MC, Mühlberger V, Piscione F, Rothman M, Wijns W, van den Brand M, Meier B (1998) Interventional cardiology in Europe 1994. Working Group Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 19:40–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Meier MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, S., Walker, A., Hügli, O. et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe. Clin Res Cardiol 96, 375–382 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-007-0513-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-007-0513-0

Key words

Navigation