Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of “IEGM Online” in ICD patients—

early detection of inappropriate classified ventricular tachycardia via Home Monitoring

  • CLINICAL CORRESPONDENCE
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A comparison of antiarrhythmic–drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near–fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. N Engl J Med (1997) 337(22): 1576–1583

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KL, Hafley G, Fisher JD et al (2002) Effect of implantable defibrillators on arrhythmic events and mortality in the multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial. Circulation 106(2):233–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moss AJ (2002) MADIT–II and implications for noninvasive electrophysiologic testing. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 7(3):179–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Korte T, Trappe HJ, Gronefeld G et al (2000) [A new ICD morphology criterion for differentiating supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia]. Z Kardiol 89(11):1019–1025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schibgilla V, Nossen J, Kuhn I et al (1998) [Anti–bradycardia ventricle stimulation during the vulnerable phase of the heart cycle in ICD system with DDD cardiac pacemaker function]. Z Kardiol 87(8):640–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Winters SL, Packer DL, Marchlinski FE et al (2001) Consensus statement on indications, guidelines for use, and recommendations for follow–up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. North American Society of Electrophysiology and Pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24(2):262–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luderitz B, Wolpert C (2003) The patient’s informed consent for pacemakers and ICD implantation: how to write and how to explain it. Z Kardiol 92(5):377–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Volkmann H, Bergmann C, Walter M (2005) [Cardiac resynchronization therapy: who is suitable? Who requires an additional ICD as a backup?]. Z Kardiol 94(Suppl 4):IV/60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregoratos G, Cheitlin MD, Conill A et al (1998) ACC/AHA Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Executive Summary – a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation). Circulation 97(13):1325–1335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hauer RN, Aliot E, Block M et al (2001) Indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Study Group on Guidelines on ICDs of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 22(13):1074–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallbruck K, Stellbrink C, Santini M et al (2002) The value of permanent follow–up of implantable pacemakers – first results of an European trial. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47(Suppl 1)Pt 2:950–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koos R, Sinha AM, Stellbrink C (2005) Home Monitoring in an ICD patient with incessant ventricular tachycardia. Z Kardiol 94(7):461–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritzsche D, Eitz T, Grimmig O et al (2004) [Home monitoring of patients after prosthetic valve replacement – a new method of early detection of valve dysfunction]. Z Kardiol 93(9):664–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Theuns DA, Res JC, Jordaens LJ (2003) Home monitoring in ICD therapy: future perspectives. Europace 5(2):139–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weretka S, Michaelsen J, Becker R et al (2003) Ventricular oversensing: a study of 101 patients implanted with dual chamber defibrillators and two different lead systems. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26(1 Pt 1):65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilkoff BL, Kuhlkamp V, Volosin K et al (2001) Critical analysis of dualchamber implantable cardioverter–defibrillator arrhythmia detection: results and technical considerations. Circulation 103(3):381–386

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fauchier L, Sadoul N, Kouakam C et al (2005) Potential cost savings by telemedicine–assisted long–term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28(Suppl 1):S255–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine I, Cardiovascular Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef Schneider Str. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany

    Oliver Ritter MD & Wolfgang R. Bauer

Authors
  1. Oliver Ritter MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolfgang R. Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Ritter MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritter, O., Bauer, W.R. Use of “IEGM Online” in ICD patients—. Clin Res Cardiol 95, 368–372 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0390-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0390-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation