Skip to main content
Log in

The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Parastomal hernia in patients with a permanent colostomy is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the diagnosis based on clinical examination and to compare this examination with the result of a specially designed questionnaire and computerised tomography (CT) scan.

Methods

Forty-one patients operated upon with an abdominoperineal resection due to rectal cancer at three hospitals between 1996 and 2002 were included. At minimum of 4 years after the operation, they underwent clinical examination by two or three independent surgeons, answered a colostomy questionnaire and were offered a CT scan of the abdominal wall.

Result

At Hospital I, 17 patients were examined by three surgeons, with inter-observer kappa values between 0.35 and 0.64. At Hospital II, 13 patients were examined by three surgeons, the kappa values ranged between 0.29 and 0.43. At Hospital III, 11 patients were examined by two surgeons, with kappa value of 0.73. The kappa value between CT scan and the colostomy questionnaire was 0.45.

Conclusion

The inter-observer reliability was low, indicating that parastomal hernia is difficult to diagnose by patient history and clinical examination. Some herniae may not be detected by CT scan, and the correlation to patient-reported complaints is low. A more sensitive radiological method to detect parastomal hernia is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Påhlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Lindmark G, Sjödahl R, Öjerskog B, Damber L, Johansson R (2007) The Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry. Br J Surg 94:1285–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sjödahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T (1988) Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal wall. Br J Surg 75:339–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: A clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson L (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. London-Schimmer EE, Leong APK, Phillips RKS (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P, de Miguel M, Marti J, Chocarro C (1994) Does the frequency of parastomal hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int J Colorectal Dis 9:65–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd NF, Pater JF, Ginsburg AD (1979) Observer variation in the classification of information from medical records. J Chronic Dis 32:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vassar Stats: Web Site for Statistical computation. http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/VassarStats.html

  10. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/index.html#Interpreted

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ambatchew Gurmu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gurmu, A., Matthiessen, P., Nilsson, S. et al. The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia. Int J Colorectal Dis 26, 89–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1050-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1050-2

Keywords

Navigation