Abstract
Introduction
Parastomal hernia in patients with a permanent colostomy is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the diagnosis based on clinical examination and to compare this examination with the result of a specially designed questionnaire and computerised tomography (CT) scan.
Methods
Forty-one patients operated upon with an abdominoperineal resection due to rectal cancer at three hospitals between 1996 and 2002 were included. At minimum of 4 years after the operation, they underwent clinical examination by two or three independent surgeons, answered a colostomy questionnaire and were offered a CT scan of the abdominal wall.
Result
At Hospital I, 17 patients were examined by three surgeons, with inter-observer kappa values between 0.35 and 0.64. At Hospital II, 13 patients were examined by three surgeons, the kappa values ranged between 0.29 and 0.43. At Hospital III, 11 patients were examined by two surgeons, with kappa value of 0.73. The kappa value between CT scan and the colostomy questionnaire was 0.45.
Conclusion
The inter-observer reliability was low, indicating that parastomal hernia is difficult to diagnose by patient history and clinical examination. Some herniae may not be detected by CT scan, and the correlation to patient-reported complaints is low. A more sensitive radiological method to detect parastomal hernia is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Påhlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Lindmark G, Sjödahl R, Öjerskog B, Damber L, Johansson R (2007) The Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry. Br J Surg 94:1285–1292
Sjödahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T (1988) Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal wall. Br J Surg 75:339–341
Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: A clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563
Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson L (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121
Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793
London-Schimmer EE, Leong APK, Phillips RKS (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920
Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P, de Miguel M, Marti J, Chocarro C (1994) Does the frequency of parastomal hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int J Colorectal Dis 9:65–67
Boyd NF, Pater JF, Ginsburg AD (1979) Observer variation in the classification of information from medical records. J Chronic Dis 32:327–332
Vassar Stats: Web Site for Statistical computation. http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/VassarStats.html
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/index.html#Interpreted
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurmu, A., Matthiessen, P., Nilsson, S. et al. The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia. Int J Colorectal Dis 26, 89–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1050-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1050-2