Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preservation of native esophagus in infants with pure esophageal atresia has good long-term outcomes despite significant postoperative morbidity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate long-term outcomes of pure esophageal atresia (EA) repair with preservation of native esophagus.

Methods

Infants with pure EA treated at our institution (2000–2010) and with minimum 5-year follow-up were reviewed (REB:1000046653). Data analysed included demographics, management and outcomes and are reported as mean ± SD/median (range).

Results

Of 185 infants with EA, 12 (7 %) had pure EA (gestational age: 36 ± 2.4 weeks, birth weight: 2353 ± 675 g). Ten had associated anomalies, including trisomy-21 (n = 2) and duodenal atresia (n = 1). Surgery: 1 patient (short gap) underwent primary thoracoscopic anastomosis, 11 had gastrostomy (Stamm, n = 5; image-guided, n = 6) as initial procedure. At definitive repair (age: 128 ± 91 days; weight 5.5 ± 2.3 kg): ten had primary anastomosis and 1 had Collis gastroplasty. No patient had esophageal replacement surgery. Outcomes: three patients had gastrostomy dehiscence requiring re-operation. At post-operative esophagram, seven had anastomotic leak successfully treated conservatively. Seven patients developed strictures requiring balloon dilatations (median two dilatations, range 1–10), six received antireflux surgery. At 7-year follow-up (range 5–15 years), all patients had the gastrostomy closed and were on full oral feeds.

Conclusions

The management of pure EA continues to be challenging. The preservation of native esophagus is possible with significant morbidity. The long-term outcomes are favourable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harmon CM, Coran AG (1998) Congenital anomalies of the esophagus. In: St Louis KY (ed) Pediatric Surgery, vol 5. Elsevier Science Health Science Division, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gross RE (1953) Surgery of infancy and childhood. WB Sauders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagolan P, Iacobelli BD, De Angelis P et al (2004) Long gap esophageal atresia and esophageal replacement: moving toward a separation? J Pediatr Surg 39:1084–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sri Paran T, Decaluwe D, Corbally M et al (2007) Long-term results of delayed primary anastomosis for pure oesophageal atresia: a 27-year follow up. Pediatr Surg Int 23:647–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holland AJA, Ron O, Pierro A et al (2009) Surgical outcomes of esophageal atresia without fistula for 24 years at a single institution. J Pediatr Surg 44:1928–1932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burjonrappa S, Thiboutot E, Castilloux J et al (2010) Type A esophageal atresia: a critical review of management strategies at a single center. J Pediatr Surg 45:865–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ein SH, Shandling B, Heiss K (1993) Pure esophageal atresia: outlook in the 1990. J Pediatr Surg 28:1147–1150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ein SH, Shandling B (1994) Pure esophageal atresia: a 50-year review. J Pediatr Surg 9:1208–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kunisaki SM, Bruch SW, Hirschl RB et al (2014) The diagnosis of fetal esophageal atresia and its implications on perinatal outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 30:971–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holder TM, Cloud DT, Lewis JE Jr et al (1964) Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. A survey of its members by the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 34:542–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zamiara P, Thomas KE, Connolly BL et al. (2015) Long-term burden of care and radiation exposure in survivors of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 50:1686–1690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zani A, Eaton S, Hoellwarth M et al (2014) International survey on the management of esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedmacher F, Puri P (2012) Delayed primary anastomosis for management of long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of complications and long-term outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 28:899–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Puri P, Blake N, O’Donnel B et al (1981) Delayed primary anastomosis following spontaneous growth of esophageal segments in esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 16:180–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aziz D, Shiller D, Gerstle JT et al (2003) Can long-gap esophageal atresia be safely managed at home while awaiting anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 5:705–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aziz D, Chait P, Kreichmn F et al (2004) Image-guided percutaneous gastrostomy in neonates with esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 11:1648–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spitz L (2006) Esophageal atresia. Lesson I have learned in a 40-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 41:1635–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kluth D (1976) Atlas of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 11:901–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanal M, Haeussler B, Tabareli W et al (2007) Pure esophageal atresia with normal outer appearance: case report. J Pediatr Surg 42:E1–E3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Foker JE, Linden BC, Boyle EM et al (1997) Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 226:533–543

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Foker JE, Kendall Krosch TC, Catton K et al (2009) Long-gap esphageal atresia treated by growth induction: the biological potential and early follow-up results. Semin Pediatr Surg 18:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bobanga ID, Barksdale EM (2015) Foker technique for the management of pure esophageal atresia: long-term outcomes at a single institution. Eur J Pediatr Surg [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25774957

  23. Lobe TE, Rothemberg SS, Waldshmitt J et al (1999) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia in an infant: a surgical first. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 3:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MacKinlay GA (2009) Esophageal atresia surgery in the 21st century. Seminars Pediatr Surg 18:20–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Collis JL (1957) An operation for hiatus hernia with short oesophagus. Thorax 12:181–188

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Shanafey S, Harvey J (2008) Long gap esophageal atresia: an Australian experience. J Pediatr Surg 43:597–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ng J, Loukogeorgakis SP, Pierro A et al (2014) Comparison of minimally invasive and open gastric transposition in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 24:742–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thakkar HS, Cooney J, Kumar N et al (2014) Measured gap lenght and outcomes in oesophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 49:1343–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agostino Pierro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zani, A., Cobellis, G., Wolinska, J. et al. Preservation of native esophagus in infants with pure esophageal atresia has good long-term outcomes despite significant postoperative morbidity. Pediatr Surg Int 32, 113–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3821-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3821-x

Keywords

Navigation