Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life: urinary bladder augmentation or substitution in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Bladder augmentation and substitution has been assumed to improve health-related quality of life in patients with urinary incontinence. This study was performed to elicit an evidence base for or against the above hypothesis.

Methods

Between 1988 and 2006, 67 bladder augmentations and 7 bladder substitutions were performed at our institute. Inclusion criteria for the cross-sectional study were a postoperative period of more than 1 year and an age of at least 10 years at the time of operation. A multimodality treatment-specific questionnaire (comprising 38 questions) was designed and sent to 61 patients. Quality of life was investigated in all patients and between the groups of patients with meningomyelocele (Group A) versus bladder exstrophy (Group B), patients, who are catheterizing themselves via urethra (Group C) versus stoma (Group D) and patients who are using (Group E) versus not using wheelchair (Group F) following the surgery. For the statistical analysis Students t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and correlation analysis were used.

Results

A significant overall improvement was found in patients quality of life following this surgery (< 0.05). Ninety percent of patients would prefer again bladder augmentation or substitution to their previous state. Patients with meningomyelocele are changing pads or diapers more frequently than exstrophy patients because of their bowel problems postoperatively. Quality of life improved better in patients performing CIC via stoma than in patients who perform it via their native urethra (P < 0.05). Outcomes were independent of patients age and of the post-augmentation time to assessment (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Bladder augmentation or substitution significantly improved the health-related quality of life in children and young adolescents taking part in the study. The authors are planning a prospective long-term follow-up of the patients (longitudinal study) to validate the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plawker MW, Rabinowitz SS, Etwaru DJ, Glassberg KI (1995) Hypergastrinemia, dysuria-hematuria and metabolic alkalosis: complications associated with gastrocystoplasty. J Urol 154(2Pt1):546–549. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67107-6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Celayir S, Goksel S, Unal T, Buyukunal SN (1997) Helicobacter pylori infection in a child with gastric augmentation. J Pediatr Surg 32(12):1757–1758. doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90527-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duel BP, Gonzalez R, Barthold JS (1998) Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol 159(3):998–1005. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63820-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Filmer RB, Spencer JR (1990) Malignancies in bladder augmentations and intestinal conduits. J Urol 143(4):671–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gosalbez R Jr, Woodard JR, Broecker BH, Warshaw B (1993) Metabolic complication of the use of stomach for urinary reconstruction. J Urol 150(2Pt2):710–712

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mills RD, Studer UE (1999) Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. J Urol 161(4):1057–1066. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61590-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vajda P, Kaiser L, Magyarlaki T, Farkas A, Vastyan AM, Pinter AB (2002) Histological findings after colocystoplasty and gastrocystoplasty. J Urol 168(2):698–701. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64727-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vajda P, Pinter AB, Harangi F, Farkas A, Vastyan AM, Oberritter ZS (2003) Metabolic findings after colocystoplasty in children. Urology 62(3):542–546. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00580-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baydar DE, Allan RW, Castellan M, Labbie A, Epstein JI (2005) Anaplastic signet ring cell carcinoma arising in gastrocystoplasty. Urology 65(6):1226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (1947) Constitution. WHO Chronicle 1. World Health Organisation, Geneva

  11. Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosh A, Abel T, Auquier P, Bellach BM, Dür W, European Kidscreen group et al (2001) Quality of life in children and adolescents: a European public health perspective. Soc Prev Med 46(5):294–302. doi:10.1007/BF01321080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Browne JP (1999) Health-related quality of life studies in urology: conceptual and methodological considerations. World J Urol 17(4):193–198. doi:10.1007/s003450050132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herdman M, Rajmil L, Ravens-Sieberer U, Builinger M, Power M, Alonso J, European Kidscreen group (2002) Expert consensus in the development of a European health-related quality of life measure for children and adolescents: a Delphi study. Acta Paediatr 91(12):1385–1390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M (1998) Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content analytical results. Qual Life Res 7(5):399–407. doi:10.1023/A:1008853819715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eiser C, Morse R (2001) A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child 84(3):205–211. doi:10.1136/adc.84.3.205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajmil L, Herdman M, Fernandez de Sanmamed MJ, Detmar S, Bruil J, Ravens-Sieberer U, European Kidscreen group et al (2004) Generic health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: a qualitative analysis of content. J Adolesc Health 34(1):37–45. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00249-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Avery KN, Bosch JL, Gotoh M, Naughton M, Jackson S, Radley SC et al (2007) Questionnaires to assess urinary and anal incontinence: review and recommendation. J Urol 177(1):39–49. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MacNeily AE, Morrell J, Secord S (2005) Lower urinary tract reconstruction for spina bifida—does it improve health related quality of life? J Urol 174(4Pt2):1637–1643. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000177730.12867.00

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Catti M, Paccalin C, Rudrigoz R, Mouriquand P (2006) Quality of life for adult women born with bladder and cloacal exstrophy: a long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Urol 2(1):16–22. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Foundation (OTKA T046213) from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary. The authors thank Professor Daniel G. Young and Fariborz Bagheri for their assistance in the preparation of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Vajda.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vajda, P., Kispal, Z., Lenart, I. et al. Quality of life: urinary bladder augmentation or substitution in children. Pediatr Surg Int 25, 195–201 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2317-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2317-3

Keywords

Navigation