Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scoliosis: a review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scoliosis, lateral curvature of the spine, has been studied since Hippocrates’ time, but remains a disputed subject in orthopaedic surgery, because of its several varieties, unknown cause and unpredictable course. A review of 30 years’ experience in a paediatric orthopaedic unit was undertaken to clarify the problem. Patient records, collected prospectively, were examined to demonstrate the incidence, prevalence, extent, course and outcome of the commonest variety, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Reference was made to the results of previously published studies. Records from a school screening programme showed that, while slight degrees of spinal curvature were widely prevalent in the community, these were of no clinical significance and major cosmetic deformity was rare: only 8 in 10,000 adolescent girls had Cobb angles of 40° or more and only half of these underwent surgical correction. Evidence to support non-operative treatment could not be demonstrated and it did not reduce the incidence of surgical intervention. Because the course of scoliosis did not seem to correspond with much published work, or with current hypotheses of aetiology, a rethinking of the whole subject is advocated. An alternative model of pathogenesis deriving from developmental biology was proposed. While advances in surgical methods have been significant, the core problems of aetiology and natural history remain. Until they are resolved, all conclusions on management must be provisional. This is where innovative thinking needs to be directed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hippocrates. Articulations, par. 47

  2. Bunnell WP (1986) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11(8):773–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stokes IAF (1994) Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine 19(2):236–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. AAOS 7:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford DS, Lonstein JE, Moe JA, Winter RB (1987) Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities. 2nd edn. WB Saunders & Co, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. James JIP (1954) Idiopathic scoliosis: the prognosis, diagnosis and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age of onset. J Bone Joint Surg 36-B(1):36–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg CJ, Fogarty EE, Moore DP, Dowling FE (1999) Left thoracic curve patterns and their association with disease. Spine 24(12):1228–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Branthwaite MA (1986) Cardiorespiratory consequences of unfused idiopathic scoliosis. Br J Dis Chest 80:360–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2006) Handedness and spinal deformity. In: Uyttendaele D, Dangerfield PH (eds) Research into spinal deformities, vol 5. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 442–448

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewonowski K, King JD, Nelson MD (1992) Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic scoliosis less than eleven years of age. Spine 17(6S):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coonrad RW, Richardson WJ, Oakes WJ (1985) Left thoracic curves can be different. Orthop Trans 9:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, Margraf SA, Cooney TE, Finegold DN (2007) Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 89:64–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McMaster MJ (1986) Hemivertebra as a cause of scoliosis. A study of 104 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 68-B(4):588–595

    Google Scholar 

  14. McMaster MJ (1998) Congenital scoliosis caused by a unilateral failure of vertebral segmentation with contralateral hemivertebrae. Spine 23(9):998–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nachemson A (1968) A long-term follow-up study of non-treated scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 39:466–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson A (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 10:278–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E, MacEwen GD (1987) Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg 69-A(1):90–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis. A 50-year natural history. JAMA 289(5):559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg 66-A(7):1061–1071

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg CJ (1994) The aetiology and natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Doctoral Thesis. University College Dublin, National University of Ireland

  21. James JIP, Zorab PA, Wynne-Davies R (1967) Scoliosis. Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 72(A):328–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Morrissey RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie G (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 72(A):320–327

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lonstein JE, Winter RB (1994) The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of 1020 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 76-A(8):1207–1221

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nachemson AL, Peterson L-E, Members of the SRS Brace Study Group (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg 77-A(6):815–822

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dickson RA, Weinstein SL (1999) Review article: bracing (and screening)—yes or no? J Bone Joint Surg 81-B(2):193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of brace treatment on the incidence of surgery. Spine 26(1):42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lessinck M-L, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Verkerk K, Verhagen A (2005) Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. Phys Ther 85(12):1329–1339

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hibbs RA (1924) A report of fifty-nine cases of scoliosis treated by the fusion operation. J Bone Joint Surg 6(1):3 (reprinted as The Classic. Clin Orthop 229:4–19, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harrington P (1962) Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 44-A(4):591–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldberg C, Blake NS, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE, Regan BF (1987) School scoliosis screening: a report. Ir Med J 80(11):325–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams W (1865) Lectures on the pathology and treatment of lateral and other forms of curvature of the spine. Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66(1):1381–1387

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine 26:E55–E63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Winter RB (1994) Congenital spinal deformity. In: Bradford DS (ed) Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 251–294

    Google Scholar 

  36. Blount WP, Moe JH (1980) The Milwaukee brace, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore/London

    Google Scholar 

  37. La Breche BG, Levangie PK, Sharby NH (1974) Cotrel traction. A new approach to the preoperative management of idiopathic scoliosis. Phys Ther 54(8):837–942

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bobechko WP, Herbert MA, Friedman HG (1979) Electrospinal instrumentation for scoliosis: current status. Orthop Clin North Am 10(4):927–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Goldberg C, Dowling FE, Regan BF, Blake NS (1981) A retrospective study of Cotrel dynamic spinal traction in the conservative management of scoliosis. Ir Med J 74(12):363–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goldberg C, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, Regan BF, Blake NS (1988) Electro-spinal stimulation in children with adolescent and juvenile scoliosis. Spine 13(5):482–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lowe T, Edgar M, Margulies JY, Miller NH, Raso J, Reinker KA, Rivard C-H (2000) Current concepts review: etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: currents trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg 82A(8):1157–1168

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE (1993) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is rising growth rate the triggering factor in progression? Eur Spine J 2:29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE (1993) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis- early menarche, normal growth. Spine 18(5):529–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldberg CJ, Groves D, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2006) Surface topography and vectors: a new measure for the three dimensional quantification of scoliotic deformity. In: Uyttendaele D, Dangerfield PH (eds) Research into spinal deformities, vol 5. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 449–455

    Google Scholar 

  45. VanValen L (1962) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution XVI(2):125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Waddington CH (1957) The strategy of the genes. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, Vernon C (1977) Anthropometry and scoliosis. In: Zorab P (ed) Scoliosis and growth. Academic, London, pp 123–164

    Google Scholar 

  48. Normelli H, Sevastik JA, Ljung G, Jonsson-Soderstrom A-M (1986) The symmetry of the breasts in normal and scoliotic girls. Spine 99(7):749–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pecina M, Lulic-Ducik O, Pecina-Hrncevic A (1991) Hereditary orthodontic anomalies and idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 15:57–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, Moore DP (1995) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as developmental instability. Genetica 96:247–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lonstein JE, Bjorklund S, Wanninger MH, Nelson RP (1982) Voluntary school screening for scoliosis in Minnesota. J Bone Joint Surg 64A(4):481–488

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hoey HMCV, Tanner JM, Cox LA (1987) Clinical growth standards for Irish children. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 338:1–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Hall JE, Emans JB (1993) A statistical comparison between natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and brace treatment in skeletally immature adolescent girls. Spine 18(7):902–908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Goldberg C, Thompson F, Dowling F, Regan BF, Blake NS (1980) Pilot study for a screening programme in South Dublin. J Ir Med Assoc 73(7):265–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fazal A, Edgar M (2006) Detection of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Belg 72(2):184–186

    Google Scholar 

  56. Root AW (1973) Endocrinology of puberty. 1. Normal sexual maturation. J Paediatr 83(1):1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Freiberg AH, Silver D, Osgood RB (1914) Report of the committee on the treatment of structural scoliosis to the American Orthopaedic Association. Am J Orthop Surg 12:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  58. Freiberg AH, Silver D, Osgood RB (1915) Second report of the committee on the treatment of structural scoliosis to the American Orthopaedic Association. Am J Orthop Surg 13:6–19

    Google Scholar 

  59. Blount WP, Schmidt AC, Keever ED, Leonard TL (1958) The Milwaukee brace in the operative treatment of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 40A(3):511–525

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mellencamp DD, Blount SP, Anderson AJ (1977) Milwaukee brace treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Late results. Clin Orthop 126:47–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Goldberg CJ, Gillic I, Connaughton O, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Canny G, Dowling FE (2003) Respiratory function and cosmesis at maturity in infantile-onset scoliosis. Spine 28(20):2397–2406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis. A 50-year natural history. JAMA 289(5):559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lowe T, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2004) Platelet calmodulin levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): can the predict curve progression and severity? Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Eur Spine J 13:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Merola AA, Haher TR, Braric M, Panagopoulos G, Mathur S, Kohani O, Lowe TG, Lenke LG, Wenger DR, Newton PO, Clements DH III, Betz RR (2002) A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 27(18):2046–2051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC, Manna B (2003) Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire. Responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 28(1):70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC, Manna B (2003) Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society patient questionnaire. Relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 28(2):74–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Thompson AG, Asher MA (2003) Dual rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicentre study. Spine 30(17 Suppl):546–557

    Google Scholar 

  68. Enneking WF, Harrington P (1969) Pathological changes in scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 51A(3):165–184

    Google Scholar 

  69. Smith RM, Dickson RA (1987) Experimental structural scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 69B(4):576–581

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dubousset J, Machida M (2001) Possible role of pineal gland in pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Experimental and clinical studies. Bull Acad Natl Med 185(3):593–604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Machida M, Dubousset J, Satoh J, Murai I, Wood KB, Yamada T, Ryu J (2001) Pathologic mechanism of experimental scoliosis in pinealectomized chickens. Spine 26(17):E385–E391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Moreau A, Azeddine B, Labelle H et al (2006) Functional and molecular classification of AIS: novel emerging concepts to understand its genetics causes and for the development of tailored pharmacological approaches. In: Aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 11th International Phillip Zorab Symposium, Christ Church, Oxford, UK, 3–5 April 2006 [J Bone Joint Surg (Br) Orthop Proc, in press]

  73. Lowe T, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2004) Platelet calmodulin levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): can the predict curve progression and severity? Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Eur Spine J 13:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sevastik JA (2006) Right convex thoracic adolescent scoliosis in the light of the thoracospinal concept. Health Technol Inf 123:552–558

    Google Scholar 

  75. Burwell RG, Freeman BJC, Dangerfield PH et al (2006) Etiologic theories of idiopathic scoliosis: neurodevelopmental concept of maturational delay of the CNS body schema (“body-in-the-brain”). Health Technol Inf 5:72–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline J. Goldberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldberg, C.J., Moore, D.P., Fogarty, E.E. et al. Scoliosis: a review. Pediatr Surg Int 24, 129–144 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-2016-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-2016-5

Keywords

Navigation