Abstract
Purpose
(1) To assess the outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates and (2) to compare them with open simple prostatectomy (OSP).
Methods
A systematic review of outcomes of MISP for benign prostatic hyperplasia with meta-analysis was conducted. The article selection process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.
Results
Twenty-seven observational studies with 764 patients were analyzed. The mean prostate volume was 113.5 ml (95 % CI 106–121). The mean increase in Qmax was 14.3 ml/s (95 % CI 13.1–15.6), and the mean improvement in IPSS was 17.2 (95 % CI 15.2–19.2). Mean duration of operation was 141 min (95 % CI 124–159), and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 284 ml (95 % CI 243–325). One hundred and four patients (13.6 %) developed a surgical complication. In comparative studies, length of hospital stay (WMD −1.6 days, p = 0.02), length of catheter use (WMD −1.3 days, p = 0.04) and estimated blood loss (WMD −187 ml, p = 0.015) were significantly lower in the MISP group, while the duration of operation was longer than in OSP (WMD 37.8 min, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in improvements in Qmax, IPSS and perioperative complications between both procedures. The small study sizes, publication bias, lack of systematic complication reporting and short follow-up are limitations.
Conclusions
MISP seems an effective and safe treatment option. It provides similar improvements in Qmax and IPSS as OSP. Despite taking longer, it results in less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Prospective randomized studies comparing OSP, MISP and laser enucleation are needed to define the standard surgical treatment for large prostates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P (2011) Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 108(7):1132–8. (cited 2014 Jan 20). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21231991
Freyer PJ (1900) A new method of performing perineal prostatectomy. Br Med J 1(2047):698–9 (cited 2014 Jan 20). http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2505977&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
MILLIN T (1947) The surgery of prostatic obstructions. Ir J Med Sci (257):185–9 (cited 2014 Jan 20). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20251964
Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC et al (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64(1):118–40 (cited 2014 Jan 21). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23541338
Leslie S, de Castro Abreu AL, Chopra S, Ramos P, Park D, Berger AK et al (2014) Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol (cited 2014 Jan 16). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412229
Zhou L-Y, Xiao J, Chen H, Zhu Y-P, Sun Y-W, Xuan Q (2009) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 27(3):385–7 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19082604
Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Cavallone B, Morra I, Bertolo R, Scarpa RM (2011) Extraperitoneoscopic transcapsular adenomectomy: complications and functional results after at least 1 year of followup. J Urol 185(5):1668–73 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21419455
Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Renard J, Grande S, Musso F, Cossu M et al (2006) Transcapsular adenomectomy(Millin): a comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery. Eur Urol 49(1):120–6 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16310927
McCullough TC, Heldwein FL, Soon SJ, Galiano M, Barret E, Cathelineau X et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: an evaluation of morbidity. J Endourol 23(1):129–33 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19119803
Van Velthoven R, Peltier A, Laguna MP, Piechaud T (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin): pilot study on feasibility. Eur Urol 45(1):103–9; discussion 109 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14667525
Sotelo R, Spaliviero M, Garcia-Segui A, Hasan W, Novoa J, Desai MM et al (2005) Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. J Urol 173(3):757–60 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15711263
Baumert H, Ballaro A, Dugardin F, Kaisary A V (2006) Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: a comparative study. J Urol 175(5):1691–4 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16600732
Mariano MB, Tefilli MV, Graziottin TM, Morales CMP, Goldraich IH (2006) Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia–a six-year experience. Eur Urol 49(1):127–31; discussion 131–2 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16314034
Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Banda E, Miranda M et al (2008) Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol 179(2):513–5 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076926
John H, Bucher C, Engel N, Fischer B, Fehr J-L (2009) Preperitoneal robotic prostate adenomectomy. Urology 73(4):811–5 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19195694
Desai MM, Fareed K, Berger AK, Astigueta JC, Irwin BH, Aron M et al (2010) Single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate: a clinical report of 34 cases. BJU Int 105(9):1296–300 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346053
Yun HK, Kwon JB, Cho SR, Kim JS (2010) Early Experience with Laparoscopic Retropubic Simple Prostatectomy in Patients with Voluminous Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Korean J Urol 51(5):323–9 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2873886&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
Ramón de Fata Chillón F, Nuñez Mora C, García Mediero JM, Cabrera Castillo P, García Tello A, Angulo Cuesta J (2010) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results. Actas Urol Esp 34(9):806–10 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20843460
Castillo OA, Bolufer E, López-Fontana G, Sánchez-Salas R, Fonerón A, Vidal-Mora I et al Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (adenomectomy): experience in 59 consecutive patients. Actas Urol Esp 35(7):434–7 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21450371
Chlosta PL, Varkarakis IM, Drewa T, Dobruch J, Jaskulski J, Antoniewicz AA et al (2011) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic Millin prostatectomy using finger enucleation. J Urol 186(3):873–6 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21788034
García-Segui A, Gascón-Mir M (2012) Comparative study between laparoscopic extraperitoneal and open adenomectomy. Actas Urol Esp 36(2):110–6 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22178347
Oktay B, Koc G, Vuruskan H, Danisoglu ME, Kordan Y (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal simple prostatectomy for benign prostate hyperplasia: a two-year experience. Urol J Jan 8(2):107–12 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21656468
Quan C, Chang W, Chen J, Li B, Niu Y (2011) Laparoscopic Madigan prostatectomy. J Endourol 25(12):1879–82 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21970337
Sutherland DE, Perez DS, Weeks DC (2011) Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 25(4):641–4 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21413877
Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Rocco B et al (2012) Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int 109(3):426–33 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21851543
Fareed K, Zaytoun OM, Autorino R, White WM, Crouzet S, Yakoubi R et al (2012) Robotic single port suprapubic transvesical enucleation of the prostate (R-STEP): initial experience. BJU Int 110(5):732–7 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22340135
Vora A, Mittal S, Hwang J, Bandi G (2012) Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: multi-institutional outcomes for glands larger than 100 grams. J Endourol 26(5):499–502 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22339054
Matei D V, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Spinelli M, Musi G, Melegari S et al (2012) Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int 110(11 Pt C):E972–E979. (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607242
Lee JY, Han JH, Moon HS, Yoo TK, Choi HY, Lee SW (2012) Single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with severe intravesical prostatic protrusion. World J Urol 30(4):511–7 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21904921
Wang L, Liu B, Yang Q, Wu Z, Yang B, Xu Z et al (2012) Preperitoneal single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate (STEP) for large-volume BPH: one-year follow-up of Qmax, IPSS, and QoL. Urology 80(2):323–8 (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22705114
Xie J-B, Tan Y-A, Wang F-L, Xuan Q, Sun Y-W, Xiao J et al (2014) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy (Madigan) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia greater than 80 mL: complications and functional outcomes after 3-year follow-up. J Endourol (cited 2014 Jan 15). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24229434
Goodnough LT, Levy JH, Murphy MF (2013) Concepts of blood transfusion in adults. Lancet 381(9880):1845–54 (cited 2014 Jan 21). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706801
Moran PS, O’Neill M, Teljeur C, Flattery M, Murphy LA, Smyth G et al (2013) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20(3):312–21 (cited 2014 Jan 21). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23311943
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Froghi S, de Win G, Van Poppel H et al (2013) Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU Int (cited 2014 Jan 21). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24053179
Ahyai SA, Chun FKH, Lehrich K, Dahlem R, Zacharias MS, Fisch MM et al (2012) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy–which procedure is faster? J Urol 187(5):1608–13 (cited 2014 Jan 20). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22425091
Yin L, Teng J, Huang C-J, Zhang X, Xu D (2013) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 27(5):604–11 (cited 2014 Jan 21). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23167266
Acknowledgments
IL was supported by the development fund of the CHUV University Hospital.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
The manuscript does not contain original clinical studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lucca, I., Shariat, S.F., Hofbauer, S.L. et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 33, 563–570 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1324-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1324-3