Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In our series of 1,900 endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomies (EERPE) the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele following simultaneous pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is between 3 and 14% depending on the extent of lymph node dissection. We report the impact of bilateral peritoneal fenestration after completion of extraperitoneal prostatectomy and PLND on the incidence of lymphocele, postoperative pain and complications.

Patients and methods

A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing EERPE and extended PLND were allocated into two groups. In Group A (n = 50) a 4–6 cm incision was performed bilaterally over the external iliac vessels down to the obturator fossa after completion of the main procedure. In Group B (n = 50) no peritoneal incisions were made. The postoperative assessment protocol included a visual analogue pain scale administered three times daily for 6 days, analgesia requirement, and ultrasound examination on 4th and 8th days, and 3 months postoperatively. CRP and leucocyte counts were measured on 1st and 2nd postoperative days. Complications were recorded according to our standard protocol using the Clavien classification.

Results

Three patients (6%) in Group A were found to have lymphoceles, none of which were symptomatic. Significantly more patients in Group B developed a lymphocele, (n = 16, 32%, P < 0.001) of which a significant number were symptomatic (n = 7, 14%, P < 0.001) and required laparoscopic fenestration. No significant difference was observed between the pain score in either group. Mean pain scores were 3.4 versus 3.8 at 6 h, and 0.8 versus 1.1 at 6 days, respectively. No difference in analgesia requirement, serum inflammatory markers and return to normal bowel activity was observed between the groups.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that peritoneal fenestration significantly reduces the incidence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele, without an increase in postoperative morbidity. As symptomatic lymphocele is one of the most common complications of extraperitoneal PLND requiring reintervention, we recommend that peritoneal fenestration should be performed routinely after extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and PLND.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D, Seemann O, Frede T (2004) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 14:75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou C (2003) Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 62:292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG, Hubosky SG, Diamond SM, McGinnis D, Strup SE (2003) Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Urology 62:481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillonneau B, El-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, Vallancien G (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169:126

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steinberg AP, Gill IS (2004) Laparoscopic prostatectomy: a promising option in the treatment of prostate cancer. Cleve Clin J Med 71:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B (2002) Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 168:23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2002) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167:51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Truss MC, Burchardt M, Hermann TR, Schwalwnberg T, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN (2007) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the university of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol 25:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos E, Rabenalt R (2006) Nerve sparing endoscopic radical prostatectomy—effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al (2006) Nerve–sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: University of Leipzig technique. J Endourol 20:925–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Tannapfel A, Liatsikos E (2006) Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 67:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, Fong YK, Lobbe M, Kiss B, Marberger M (2005) Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48:83–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pineiro LM, Caceres F, Sanchez C, Tabernero A, Cansino JR et al (2006) Learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a University teaching hospital: experience after the first 600 cases. Eur Urol Suppl 5:914–924

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Horn LC, Liatsikos EN (2006) Modular training for residents with no prior experience with open pelvic surgery in endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49:491–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Lee B, Truss MC, Schwaibold H, Buchardt M et al (2006) Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 24:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ, Link RE, Sullivan W, Su LM (2005) Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174:135–139. Discussion 139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blana A, Straub M, Wild PJ, Lunz JC, Bach T, Wieland WF, Ganzer R (2007) Approach to endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): the impact of previous laparoscopic experience on the learning curve. BMC Urol 7:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, König F, Aedtner B, Dorschner W (2002) The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 20:48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thiele R (2004) Die radikale retropubische prostatektomie—Goldstandard beim prostatakarzinom? Urologe A 43:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM (2006) Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy—critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49:612–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heidenreich A, Ohlmann CH, Polyakov S (2007) Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52:29–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A et al (2006) Complications and other outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 50:1006–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schumacher M, Burkhard FC, Studer UE (2005) The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer. Urologe A 44(6):645–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Studer UE (2005) The role of lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2(7):336–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heidenreich A, Von Knobloch R, Varga Z et al (2004) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)—an update on >300 cases. J Urol 171(312):1183

    Google Scholar 

  26. Link RE, Morton RA (2001) Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 28(3):491–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark T, Parekh DJ, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Smith ER Jr, Wells N, Smith JA Jr (2003) Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169(1):145–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Allaf ME, Partin AW, Carter BH (2006) The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Rev Urol 8(3):112–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Solberg A, Angelsen A, Bergan U, Haugen OA, Viset T, Klepp O (2003) Frequency of lymphoceles after open laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Scand J Urol 37(3):218–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Palisaar J, Noldus J, Fernandez S, Huland H (2003) Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 43:113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg.

Additional information

J.-U. Stolzenburg and J. Wasserscheid have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolzenburg, JU., Wasserscheid, J., Rabenalt, R. et al. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol 26, 581–586 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3

Keywords

Navigation